Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Nature & Landscapes 
Thread started 20 Aug 2013 (Tuesday) 23:30
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

First Waterfall attempt

 
redlable
Member
84 posts
Joined Jun 2009
Location: Utah
     
Aug 20, 2013 23:30 |  #1

Ok this was my first try at a waterfall. Other then shooting in harsh light what should I have done different? Any thoughts would be appreciated:D

IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Byte size: ZERO | PHOTOBUCKET ERROR IMAGE


IMAGE NOT FOUND
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Byte size: ZERO | PHOTOBUCKET ERROR IMAGE



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jarvis ­ Creative ­ Studios
Goldmember
Avatar
2,508 posts
Gallery: 28 photos
Likes: 1107
Joined Aug 2013
Location: Johnson City, Tennessee
     
Aug 20, 2013 23:39 |  #2

Can't see pics. Is this just me?


WEBSITE (external link)
flickr (external link)
Sony ZV-1 || Sony a7RIV || Sony a9 || Sony a1 || Sony FE 20mm f1.8 G || Sony FE 24-70 f2.8 GM || Sony FE 50mm f1.2 GM || Sony FE 90mm f2.8 Macro G OSS || Sony FE 135mm f1.8 GM || Sony FE 200-600 f5.6-6.3 G OSS || Godox speedlights and strobes

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
foxbodychris
Senior Member
Avatar
250 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Aug 2013
Location: Mooresville, NC
     
Aug 21, 2013 00:15 |  #3

#2 has some good blur which is cool. Maybe try shooting it in the early morning or late evening hours when sun is not so harsh.


Canon 1D Mark III, 7D Mark II gripped, 70-200 2.8 IS II, manfrotto monopod, manfrotto tripod
FACEBOOK (external link)
FLICKR (external link)
WEBSITE (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Snydremark
my very own Lightrules moment
20,051 posts
Gallery: 66 photos
Likes: 5573
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Issaquah, WA USA
     
Aug 21, 2013 00:26 |  #4

Both are nice and not at all bad for getting your feet wet with these shoots [no pun intended]; I think the first one works better in this case than the filtered one.

I'd suggest:
- De-centering the fall itself; it's a bit to centered both vertically and horizontally here.
- Include less sky and more of the stream; since there isn't anything interesting in the sky, I'd have dropped the angle a bit so that a little less of it was in the frame and more of the stream where you'd have some additional texture going on.
- I don't know what exposure settings you used, but using a smaller aperture would have given you a little better sharpness in the trees in the background. As it is, there's a little too much blur back there and my eyes keep trying to focus better; it's sort of jarring.

As for the filtered shot:
- The magenta color cast is way too heavy; I'd work on processing that out.
- This shot appears a bit overexposed compared to the first one, as well; notice how the sky went white instead of blue?
- After putting the filter in place, did you refocus? The image just looks fuzzier, overall.
- The long exposure motion here doesn't work as well, for me, as in other shots, simply because the size and makeup of this fall "feel" like you should see the actual definition of the water better (it's smaller and shallow).


- Eric S.: My Birds/Wildlife (external link) (R5, RF 800 f/11, Canon 16-35 F/4 MkII, Canon 24-105L f/4 IS, Canon 70-200L f/2.8 IS MkII, Canon 100-400L f/4.5-5.6 IS I/II)
"The easiest way to improve your photos is to adjust the loose nut between the shutter release and the ground."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
winam
Goldmember
1,942 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jul 2010
Location: Shanghai, China
     
Aug 21, 2013 08:30 |  #5

love the second one


Canon EOS 650D, Canon EOS 1000d, SIGMA DG 18-250m, Canon 18-55mm
http://www.rene-photography.de/ (external link)
Please take a look at my Review for the awesome Daminion Server DAM-System (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
redlable
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
84 posts
Joined Jun 2009
Location: Utah
     
Aug 21, 2013 09:27 as a reply to  @ winam's post |  #6

First thank you all for you comments!

Snydremark,

I really appreciate the feed back. I will be burning it into the brain for when I can sneak away and get back up to this water fall (or I guess more of a water slide:D) early one morning or late one evening to try this again.

I have to admit is funny looking at waterfalls now thinking how can I take a picture of it instead of I wonder if a big brown or rainbow is holding under there:lol:. Dam photography bug:mad::lol:




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jon ­ Clemens
Goldmember
1,113 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Jan 2012
Location: Solvang, California
     
Aug 21, 2013 09:27 |  #7

Some waterfalls are just more photogenic than others. This is one that takes more effort than others.
Eric has covered most of the technical stuff. Personally, I would have composed it 'lower' to eliminate the sky and mountain completely as they don't add anything and are a distraction. If there was any way to back up a bit and provide more of a foreground to lead the viewer into the fall it would have been nice.


Canon 7D | 400L | 70-200L | 24-105L | Tokina 11-16
jonclemensphotography.​com

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Scott ­ M
Goldmember
3,401 posts
Gallery: 111 photos
Likes: 517
Joined May 2008
Location: Michigan / South Carolina
     
Aug 21, 2013 09:29 |  #8

I agree with Eric that the composition may have been improved by moving the falls off-center to the left to show more of the stream below the falls. For the 2nd shot, I personally think there is a little too much blur in the water for the volume of water flowing. Maybe a little faster shutter speed would have worked better, yet still produced some blur. This is strictly a matter of different tastes, though.


Photo Gallery (external link)
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tagnal
Goldmember
1,255 posts
Likes: 64
Joined Aug 2010
Location: Bay Area, CA
     
Aug 21, 2013 19:20 |  #9

Jon Clemens wrote in post #16227229 (external link)
Some waterfalls are just more photogenic than others. This is one that takes more effort than others.
Eric has covered most of the technical stuff. Personally, I would have composed it 'lower' to eliminate the sky and mountain completely as they don't add anything and are a distraction. If there was any way to back up a bit and provide more of a foreground to lead the viewer into the fall it would have been nice.

I was just going to suggest this, but now I don't have to :)


5D3 / M3 / S100 / Σ 35 Art / 50 1.8 / 135 L / 17-40 L / 24-70 L / 70-200 f/4 IS L / m 22 2.0 / 580ex II
Toy List | flickr (external link) | FAA (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,154 views & 0 likes for this thread, 8 members have posted to it.
First Waterfall attempt
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Nature & Landscapes 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is ANebinger
1078 guests, 172 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.