-= 70D owners unite! Post up pics and discuss!

Ranger-spectacular shot! I see you chose the 18-55mm. any more shots?

Ranger187 wrote in post #16260020

IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com/​photos/ranger187/96516​73406/
IMG_0619 by Ranger187, on Flickr

Not bad for an old guy!

Sweet.

Thats what my wife says every now and then

meglet wrote in post #16259627
I did, actually, but since the 60D lacked MFA I couldn't do anything about it. I even sent the lens & 60D to Canon for calibration at one point, which was a whole other mess. The hope of being able to correct the 24-105 is one of the primary reasons I upgraded to the 70D. Until I drag out the tripod, lightbox, and a dollar bill, though, I've gone back to the 18-135 as my walk-around lens.

I see, that would have been so frustrating to have such a nice L lens that didn't focus correctly.

Hopefully MFA can fix for you, check out Dot tuning, that sounds like a pretty easy and quick way to calibrate. If that doesn't seem to do the trick then get more technical.

Some BIF. The autofocus seem very good so far... (Lens Canon 100-400mm)

ct1co2 wrote in post #16259527
I'd even be happy to see someone post an honest to goodness real life high ISO sample at or above 3200 from the 70D itself. For all the talk of the sensor capability, have not really seen anything (here) that shows it off.

6400:

IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com …/61744772@N06/9​620220638/

The keeper rate for BIF is about the same as the 7D (I had for 3 ½ years), all settings the same it just seems the images on 70D are a little sharper to me.

100-400@ 400 (heavy crop on both)

Keyan wrote in post #16261243
6400:

IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com …/61744772@N06/9​620220638/
60D by slcko, on Flickr

Thanks! That looks really clean. How do you find it differs in IQ vs the 60D?

MedicineMan4040 wrote in post #16260106
Ranger-spectacular shot! I see you chose the 18-55mm. any more shots?

I chose it because EVERY shot was off on the tripod, moved it to my friends tripod. Off.

He put it on his body, and it was off too. I'll MAF/DOT it later. At least this verifies the issue.

I got about 500 shots. I'm going through the grueling task of viewing them all now and saving only the ones I want, then "post processing" via some of the suggestions offered.

I didn't get home until 4am. So it might be a bit until I'm done.

i-G12 wrote in post #16260193
Not bad for an old guy!

Sweet.

Thanks cupcake.

ct1co2 wrote in post #16261481
Thanks! That looks really clean. How do you find it differs in IQ vs the 60D?

Well, it has more megapickles, which is nice for even more cropping flexibility when you need it. Overall the shots look pretty similar to the 60D in terms of sharpness and such with the same lenses. The jpeg ISO is at least one full stop cleaner. I rarely shoot raw, and with the improved noise control I see less of a need to. If i know I might want to do heavy post processing I will still use RAW, which is about the same quality wise as the 60D.

For me the killer features were the improved AF in both viewfinder and Liveview/video, the higher FPS is also nice at times. The wireless is actually really cool with the remote shutter mode, however not having a proper ipad version and not being able to download the full size files is annoying. Touchscreen is very useful as well.

A few straight out of the camera HDR images.

HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR

IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com …/31981087@N04/9​655133007/

HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR

Dynalmadman wrote in post #16259659
My wife took this a couple hours ago, program auto setting, no processing, SOOC.

Michael

very nice picture!

Yep the reason I got this body:

IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com …dicineman4040/9​654862641/

IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com …dicineman4040/9​658096854/