cubatahavana wrote in post #17453356
Paul, be careful, I'm catching up!
My first ever bug photo (silverfish?)
Paul, be careful, I'm catching up!
My first ever bug photo (silverfish?)
Nice!
Feb 28, 2015 09:48 | #9736 cubatahavana wrote in post #17453356 Paul, be careful, I'm catching up! My first ever bug photo (silverfish?) Nice! Fuji X....BAAAAM! Renders way different than Sony.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
PaulIddon Cream of the Crop  More info | Feb 28, 2015 09:49 | #9737 Jeff Hanson wrote in post #17453668 Wow, Paul I think this may be the best example yet of the quality of the lens. Although he's a little camouflaged, the detail on this little guy is incredible.
My site: http://www.pauliddon.co.uk
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 28, 2015 09:50 | #9738
Fuji X....BAAAAM! Renders way different than Sony.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
evelakes Goldmember  More info | Feb 28, 2015 09:52 | #9739 Visiting a Motorcycle fair this year.  Classic by Evelakes67, on Flickr GSX-S 1000F by Evelakes67, on Flickr Suzuki by Evelakes67, on FlickrA camera is a tool for learning how to see without a camera.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
burnet44 Cream of the Crop  More info Post edited over 8 years ago by burnet44. | Feb 28, 2015 17:37 | #9740 wow  Image hosted by forum (715306) © burnet44 [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff. Canon 1DIV, Canon 1DII, 7D2 Canon gripped, 70-200 2.8 ISM II, Canon 50 1.8, Sigma 17-50 2.8, Canon 300 2.8, Canon 550 EX flash
LOG IN TO REPLY |
PaulIddon Cream of the Crop More info | Mar 01, 2015 05:41 | #9741 Did find a harvestman this morning, but it was very dull really and had to ramp the ISO up to 5000 and to 6400 which meant running NR to get rid of the lumpy bits. Came out OK though I think. What do you think?   Paul. My site: http://www.pauliddon.co.uk
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 01, 2015 12:05 | #9742 Paul Iddon wrote in post #17454845 Did find a harvestman this morning, but it was very dull really and had to ramp the ISO up to 5000 and to 6400 which meant running NR to get rid of the lumpy bits. Came out OK though I think. What do you think? ISO5000 Paul. They look perfectly acceptable to me, but I regularly shoot the 70D at 6400 and have never felt that it needed heavy noise reduction so my standards might not be as high as others. Aaron
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mick_R Member 37 posts Likes: 2 Joined Nov 2013 More info | Mar 01, 2015 19:47 | #9743 solepatch wrote in post #17455317 They look perfectly acceptable to me, but I regularly shoot the 70D at 6400 and have never felt that it needed heavy noise reduction so my standards might not be as high as others. 6400 is fine until you start cropping, the more you crop the worse it gets and it will also depend on how much noise reduction you allow your camera to do.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JeffHanson Goldmember More info Post edited over 8 years ago by Jeff Hanson. | Mar 01, 2015 21:32 | #9744 I've been shooting a ton with the Fuji X system lately (just added the X100T to my collection) so I haven't had much to contribute, but I always have the 70D ready for wildlife. These aren't going to make it into any wildlife magazines, but they aren't half bad for being shot thru a double pane window at 3200 ISO:   Fuji X....BAAAAM! Renders way different than Sony.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 01, 2015 22:46 | #9745 Mick_R wrote in post #17455940 6400 is fine until you start cropping, the more you crop the worse it gets and it will also depend on how much noise reduction you allow your camera to do. You have a point there, I almost never crop in post and if I do its usually pretty minimal. I have in camera NR disabled completely on all of my cameras as I prefer to do it myself in post if need be. Aaron
LOG IN TO REPLY |
evelakes Goldmember More info | Mar 02, 2015 07:53 | #9746 Shot the moon last night and made it in honor of Leonard Nimroy .  moon 1-3-2015 by Evelakes67, on FlickrA camera is a tool for learning how to see without a camera.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
PaulIddon Cream of the Crop More info | Mar 02, 2015 08:47 | #9747 evelakes wrote in post #17456561 Shot the moon last night and made it in honor of Leonard Nimroy . moon 1-3-2015 by Evelakes67, on FlickrNice one mate My site: http://www.pauliddon.co.uk
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Mar 02, 2015 08:55 | #9748 Taken with the Samyang 35 1.4. Ridiculously sharp for the bargain basement price, but fully manual. Great for things that aren't moving.    Fuji X....BAAAAM! Renders way different than Sony.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
evelakes Goldmember More info | Mar 02, 2015 10:29 | #9749 Jeff Hanson wrote in post #17456645 Taken with the Samyang 35 1.4. Ridiculously sharp for the bargain basement price, but fully manual. Great for things that aren't moving.
A camera is a tool for learning how to see without a camera.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
evelakes Goldmember More info | Thx Paul. A camera is a tool for learning how to see without a camera.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2797 guests, 172 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
