Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 21 Aug 2013 (Wednesday) 18:43
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

70-200mm f/4 and T1i

 
horton581
Mostly Lurking
13 posts
Joined Mar 2013
     
Aug 21, 2013 18:43 |  #1

My mother has a T1i, is looking to upgrade to a 70D, and just got the 70-200mm f/4. When we were playing with it today, she felt that the images where really soft and out of focus. I agree. Granted, she zoomed all the way in on the photos, but they did seem a bit out of focus in some pictures and sharp in others. I chalked it up to the fact that it was used on a T1i and the body was the limitation, but I am unsure. What do you think? I put it on my camera (don't laugh, it's just a Rebel XS) and we had the same effect. Some were sharp and some weren't really in focus. Will this change if and when she gets a 70D? I need opinions!!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
icacphotography
Senior Member
613 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Jan 2013
Location: Niagara Region Canada
     
Aug 21, 2013 18:45 |  #2

if they were OOF on some images and sharp on others i'd say it's user error. I'd have a hard time chalking it up to the lens if you can get sharp shots out of it some of the time. Not to mention the 70-200 F4 is regarded as one of the sharpest lenses canon makes and it's also a very cheap way to enter the world of L glass. Given what you've said I highly doubt upgrading to the 70D will fix the issues I'd suspect it's something in your mother's technique. Without looking at the pictures though it's hard to be more specific than that.


Body:50D gripped Magic Lantern'd
Lenses:50mm 1.8,40mm 2.8,28-105 USM II,70-210 F4, 1962 Asahi Pentax Super Takumar 55mm 1.8
Flash: Canon 430 EX
The camera is just a tool - it is not responsible for the picture.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
The ­ Dark ­ Knight
Goldmember
1,194 posts
Likes: 49
Joined Apr 2012
     
Aug 21, 2013 19:27 |  #3

Agreed that it's hard to determine without seeing some samples. That being said, the first thing I'd suspect is shutter speed, especially since you mentioned your mother was using the lens zoomed all the way in, and this lens does not have IS. I like to account for the crop factor on a APS-C camera, so I'd say you should aim for a shutter speed of 1/320 at a minimum for sharp pictures, more so if your subject is moving fast.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
YashicaFX2
Goldmember
1,003 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2013
Location: A quiet place in the country.
     
Aug 21, 2013 22:41 |  #4
bannedPermanent ban

Agree with the shutter speed assessment of your problem. Post some examples, please. I know I can't hold my 70-200 2.8 steady at 1/200 w/o the OS engaged.


Dedicated APS-c shooter. Gripped 60D, 60 2.8, 10-22, 15-85, Σ70-200 OS and a big white something or other! Plus a 5D w/28-75.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Blubayou
Senior Member
369 posts
Joined Oct 2012
Location: Saratoga Springs, NY
     
Aug 22, 2013 08:36 |  #5

Was there nothing in focus, or was the intended focus point out of focus?

I am thinking it was either missed focus (perhaps camera is selecting focus point?) or shutter speed (hand shake or subject motion).

As others have said, samples with settings would help determine what the issue could be.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PhilF
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,737 posts
Likes: 609
Joined Jan 2010
Location: Valencia, CA
     
Aug 22, 2013 08:39 |  #6

I work with a 70-200 F/4 in my gigs and it's sharp as a tack.
Work on your stance and technique... shutter speed should be up.


http://philfernandezph​otography.com (external link)
http://www.philfashion​photography.com (external link)
https://www.instagram.​com/philfernimagery/ (external link)
https://www.facebook.c​om/philfphotography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
brian4646
Member
139 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 31
Joined Dec 2011
Location: Tennessee
     
Aug 22, 2013 08:39 |  #7

Test is on a tripod and you'll know if it's the camera or user error.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
paddler4
Goldmember
Avatar
1,437 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 71
Joined Aug 2009
     
Aug 22, 2013 08:53 |  #8

Unless there is something wrong with the specific copy of either the body or the lens, neither is the problem. The 70-200 f/4, if you mean the IS version, is an extremely sharp lens. And there is no reason at all why it should not produce sharp images on a T2i, or any other Rebel, including your XS. (I'm not laughing--that is a capable camera). The T2i has a newer, better sensor than my camera, and I get very sharp images from the 70-200.

The fact that you got the same result with two different bodies suggests that there is nothing wrong with her T2i. So unless you have a defective lens, the problem is technique.


Check out my photos at http://dkoretz.smugmug​.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
horton581
THREAD ­ STARTER
Mostly Lurking
13 posts
Joined Mar 2013
     
Aug 22, 2013 13:05 |  #9

Blubayou wrote in post #16230010 (external link)
Was there nothing in focus, or was the intended focus point out of focus?

I am thinking it was either missed focus (perhaps camera is selecting focus point?) or shutter speed (hand shake or subject motion).

As others have said, samples with settings would help determine what the issue could be.

No, most of the pictures had something in focus, but it was usually too the left of what was intended to be focused on. I'm sure that a remedy would be to do it manually, but you would think that such a good lens would do a better job in autofocus.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
horton581
THREAD ­ STARTER
Mostly Lurking
13 posts
Joined Mar 2013
     
Aug 22, 2013 13:06 |  #10

Thank guys! I must clarify, the issue was when we upload the pictures and "zoomed" to 100% on the photo. They seemed sharp, but not as sharp as some. I'm thinking that the problem is not a fast enough shutter speed and/or having to use a higher ISO in order to use such a high shutter speed, degrading the quality of the picture. These older Rebel's doing like a high ISO. I'll post some pictures.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
horton581
THREAD ­ STARTER
Mostly Lurking
13 posts
Joined Mar 2013
     
Aug 22, 2013 13:43 |  #11

Handheld
Shutter: 1/320
Aperture: f/7.1
ISO 800
180mm

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2013/08/4/LQ_660075.jpg
Image hosted by forum (660075) © horton581 [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
horton581
THREAD ­ STARTER
Mostly Lurking
13 posts
Joined Mar 2013
     
Aug 22, 2013 14:02 |  #12

(I'm not positive I uploaded these correctly, I've never uploaded one on the forum before)

Tripod
1/13
f/4
ISO100
200mm

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2013/08/4/LQ_660080.jpg
Image hosted by forum (660080) © horton581 [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
The ­ Dark ­ Knight
Goldmember
1,194 posts
Likes: 49
Joined Apr 2012
     
Aug 22, 2013 14:56 |  #13

To me those look okay for 100% crops. Are you shooting JPEGs? The first picture is at ISO 800, which I believe for a T1i is getting a bit high, and there is a bit of noise being shown there. The in-camera noise reduction can lead to a loss of detail and make the picture look "less sharp". Also, I think focus is just tough to nail on such a small subject, especially at 180mm!

On the 2nd picture, looks fine to me. The frog's nose (do frogs have noses? snouts?) area looks sharp, can see the pores or whatever...

I'd say do this test - Set the camera on a tripod, ideally outdoors in really good light so you can shoot at ISO 100 and still get a fast shutter speed (I'd say at least 1/500) and f/8. Use live view and zoom in on your subject and use manual focus to fine tune your focus. Then try the shot. If you do that, I'm going to say your pictures will look tack sharp.

But judging by your 2 examples, I don't think there's anything wrong with your equipment...




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JustinPoe
Senior Member
707 posts
Likes: 8
Joined Feb 2008
     
Aug 22, 2013 15:30 |  #14

horton581 wrote in post #16230920 (external link)
Handheld
Shutter: 1/320
Aperture: f/7.1
ISO 800
180mm

800 ISO really kills IQ on the older rebels. I'd probably open it up to F4 and drop the ISO on that sort of shot.

horton581 wrote in post #16230981 (external link)
(I'm not positive I uploaded these correctly, I've never uploaded one on the forum before)

Tripod
1/13
f/4
ISO100
200mm

1/13 at 200m?? That's a really decent picture for that slow of a shutter speed at that focal length.

I suggest shooting in better light and/or shoot on a tripod to really see what that lens is capable of.


500px (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Ishoot4fun
Senior Member
Avatar
275 posts
Joined Dec 2011
     
Aug 22, 2013 19:21 as a reply to  @ JustinPoe's post |  #15

Also you will have a shallow dof when you are zoomed in to 200mm , much of the image will not be in focus, with my rebel I select the focus point 95 percent of the time..


7d/T3i/70-200 f4/50mm f1.8/85 1.8/ 18-55/
430EXII/YN 560ii/

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,493 views & 0 likes for this thread, 14 members have posted to it.
70-200mm f/4 and T1i
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is ealarcon
504 guests, 138 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.