Do you guys really think the Samyangs/Rokinons can be considered "cheap lenses"???
LevinadeRuijter I'm a bloody goody two-shoes! 22,958 posts Gallery: 457 photos Best ofs: 12 Likes: 15536 Joined Sep 2008 Location: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, EU More info | Sep 14, 2014 13:56 | #511 Do you guys really think the Samyangs/Rokinons can be considered "cheap lenses"??? Wild Birds of Europe: https://photography-on-the.net …showthread.php?p=19371752
LOG IN TO REPLY |
CopperNYC Senior Member 399 posts Likes: 23 Joined Sep 2011 Location: Queens County, NYC NY More info | Sep 14, 2014 14:37 | #512 Levina de Ruijter wrote in post #17153854 Do you guys really think the Samyangs/Rokinons can be considered "cheap lenses"??? Op listed 28-135 IS as a "cheap" lens, last i look it was 479 at b&h, don't know what they meant by cheap? Looks like any lens under that price is fair game to post 40D Gripped, 50D, T2I Gripped, 5D Mark III Gripped, EF-S 18-55 IS, EF-S 55-250 IS
LOG IN TO REPLY |
panicatnabisco Senior Member More info | Sep 14, 2014 15:27 | #513 Cheap = does not cost a lot of money. So yes Canon 1DX III | 1DX | 6D II | 6D | 16-35/2.8 II | 24-70/2.8 II | 35/1.4 II | 50/1.8 | 70-200/2.8 IS II | 85/1.4 IS | 100/2.8 IS macro | 200mm f/2 | 400/2.8 IS II | 2xIII
LOG IN TO REPLY |
LevinadeRuijter I'm a bloody goody two-shoes! 22,958 posts Gallery: 457 photos Best ofs: 12 Likes: 15536 Joined Sep 2008 Location: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, EU More info | Sep 14, 2014 15:30 | #514 I always thought that the word "cheap" in the title does not just refer to the price tag. Wild Birds of Europe: https://photography-on-the.net …showthread.php?p=19371752
LOG IN TO REPLY |
EverydayGetaway Cream of the Crop More info | Sep 14, 2014 19:38 | #515 Levina de Ruijter wrote in post #17153854 Do you guys really think the Samyangs/Rokinons can be considered "cheap lenses"??? Considering I paid $250 for it new... yes. Levina de Ruijter wrote in post #17154004 I always thought that the word "cheap" in the title does not just refer to the price tag. And how else would it be meant? twoshadows wrote in post #16228881 For the purposes of this thread, let's keep it real cheap. No "L"s to be sure and most prosumer glass is not what I'd consider cheap. I'm talking nifty fifty, pancake, 28-135IS & 28-105 II, 18-55, cheap third party glass, etc. Let's show 'em that it is the photographer and not the equipment. ![]() I consider anything under $300 new to be a "cheap" lens. Fuji X-T3 // Fuji X-Pro2 (Full Spectrum) // Fuji X-H1 // Fuji X-T1
LOG IN TO REPLY |
bidkev Goldmember 4,847 posts Gallery: 2123 photos Best ofs: 3 Likes: 12862 Joined Jul 2013 Location: From Blackpool UK to Brisbane Australia 20 yrs ago More info | Sep 15, 2014 01:31 | #516 Canon 40D 18-55 kit See my fishy photography here: https://kevindickinsonfineartphot.smugmug.com/Tropical-Fish-2/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
NCSA197 Goldmember More info | Sep 16, 2014 18:19 | #517 Canon 75-300 f4-5.6
LOG IN TO REPLY |
EverydayGetaway Cream of the Crop More info | Sep 16, 2014 20:20 | #518 ^I have one too and honestly I don't think it's nearly as bad as people make it out to be. I still have mine, but I pretty much never use it since I have my Vivitar S1 70-210mm, but I don't bother selling it because it's basically worthless to sell... Fuji X-T3 // Fuji X-Pro2 (Full Spectrum) // Fuji X-H1 // Fuji X-T1
LOG IN TO REPLY |
KenNielsen Goldmember 1,510 posts Likes: 2 Joined Jun 2004 Location: Portland OR More info | Sep 16, 2014 20:59 | #519 Some are 'cheap' settings, which do nothing to help a cheap lens. Slow shutter speed and hand-held blur should not be blamed on a cheap lens.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 16, 2014 21:20 | #520 Don't know if it is my best but it was taken with the 55-250 IS (non-stm), $120, in the box on Ebay.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
bidkev Goldmember 4,847 posts Gallery: 2123 photos Best ofs: 3 Likes: 12862 Joined Jul 2013 Location: From Blackpool UK to Brisbane Australia 20 yrs ago More info | Sep 16, 2014 21:35 | #521 18-55 kit See my fishy photography here: https://kevindickinsonfineartphot.smugmug.com/Tropical-Fish-2/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
cololeo Member 172 posts Likes: 21 Joined Oct 2009 Location: Southern Colorado More info | Find the sweet spots in what you have. I'm OK with this from an 18-55 kit lens. Image hosted by forum (695689) © cololeo [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
airbutchie Not too crunchy More info | Sep 25, 2014 10:15 | #523 Flaring Nifty Fifty... Back to the basics... I'm sure in one time or another, this was in your glass inventory... I know it was in mine, many MANY years ago... Now its been acquired once again... Hehehe... 1Ds3 + 50 1.8 ... ISO 1600, f/2 @ 1/100sec... ![]() Hi. My name is Butch...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 25, 2014 11:34 | #524 40 pancake 55-250 stm
55-250 stm IMAGE LINK: https://flic.kr/p/oT4icP https://www.flickr.com/photos/malwan/
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 25, 2014 13:34 | #525 Sony A7siii/A7iv/ZV-1 - FE 24/1.4 - SY 24/2.8 - FE 35/2.8 - FE 50/1.8 - FE 85/1.8 - F 600/5.6 - CZ 100-300 - Tamron 17-28/2.8 - 28-75/2.8 - 28-200 RXD
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is zachary24 1188 guests, 129 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||