JJ &Bella
The boy was very hard to get a smile out of, and by very hard I mean even his parents were happy with just the content look. So is something like this decent otherwise?
Aug 21, 2013 22:13 | #1 IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com …/90717616@N08/9560372648/ JJ &Bella The boy was very hard to get a smile out of, and by very hard I mean even his parents were happy with just the content look. So is something like this decent otherwise? 6D | EF 35 f2 IS | EF 50 f1.4 | EF 85 f1.8 | EF 135 f2.0
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Iancentric Senior Member More info | Aug 21, 2013 22:37 | #2 it's okay, I think there is a little too much headroom, so a crop to 8x10 would be good and that would take care of the bright green area in the top middle as well.The tree branch in the top left should go as well..The dandelion at the bottom bugs me, but that might be because of the war on dandelions I am having in my yard
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Iancentric Senior Member More info | Aug 21, 2013 22:43 | #3 just my opinion though, the parents liked it... Image hosted by forum (660016) © Iancentric [SHARE LINK] THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Aug 21, 2013 22:46 | #4 Thanks for the critique! I agree about some slight vignetting on the original. I don't know about the tighter crop, maybe the softness ruins it. I hate the dandelion too! And the girl wasn't obnoxiously dressed on purpose lol, she is his cousin who just dropped in after his mini session. 6D | EF 35 f2 IS | EF 50 f1.4 | EF 85 f1.8 | EF 135 f2.0
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Iancentric Senior Member More info | Aug 21, 2013 23:05 | #5 chubbyone wrote in post #16229154 Thanks for the critique! I agree about some slight vignetting on the original. I don't know about the tighter crop, maybe the softness ruins it. I hate the dandelion too! And the girl wasn't obnoxiously dressed on purpose lol, she is his cousin who just dropped in after his mini session. I'm still doing this for free for people but would like to eventually earn a 12-pack or something ![]() Take a look at the full size image on flickr, look for a razor sharp focus point. The 50mm lens is certainly capable of providing one..
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Aug 21, 2013 23:18 | #6 08photog wrote in post #16229194 Take a look at the full size image on flickr, look for a razor sharp focus point. The 50mm lens is certainly capable of providing one.. composition and exposure are very good, you are definitely on the right track It's easily worth a 12 pack, maybe even 24 ![]() I think I get what your saying. The original image is soft. I thought so too. I need to work on shutter speed vs aperture balance, and steady hand technique. 6D | EF 35 f2 IS | EF 50 f1.4 | EF 85 f1.8 | EF 135 f2.0
LOG IN TO REPLY |
CactusJuice Senior Member 853 posts Joined Jan 2010 More info | Aug 21, 2013 23:24 | #7 Wow there's no reason to be using such a wide aperture here. Appears to have been plenty of light. They seem to be a fair distance from the background. And you've got two subject to keep in focus. I know blurry backgrounds are a cool effect to talk about online, but concentrate on your subjects and composing them. Keep your portraits around f8 while you're learning. There will be plenty of time to get fancy later on.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Iancentric Senior Member More info | Aug 21, 2013 23:31 | #8 it's not a bad picture, I just think It so close to the next level it was worth commenting on.. I used to always shoot wide open, i thought it was best for portraits, then i started noticing how many people shoot at f8, so i tried, it made a big difference, i also started using higher iso, i think nothing of going to 400 now. If exposure is right, it will print an 8x10 no problem at all..
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Aug 21, 2013 23:32 | #9 CactusJuice wrote in post #16229237 Wow there's no reason to be using such a wide aperture here. Appears to have been plenty of light. They seem to be a fair distance from the background. And you've got two subject to keep in focus. I know blurry backgrounds are a cool effect to talk about online, but concentrate on your subjects and composing them. Keep your portraits around f8 while you're learning. There will be plenty of time to get fancy later on. These kids are adorable. If you make them look good, they will make you look good Not sure how much time you had to get acquainted. Visit with them first, before you even bring out the camera. If you can play with them that's the best.I know these two,they are children of friends. They know me without the camera, but your right they do shy up a bit. 6D | EF 35 f2 IS | EF 50 f1.4 | EF 85 f1.8 | EF 135 f2.0
LOG IN TO REPLY |
olafsosh I am a nice and fluffy dude More info | Aug 22, 2013 01:01 | #10 Skin looks green-ish. - Olafs Osh
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tmoore323 Goldmember 1,945 posts Likes: 4 Joined Oct 2010 More info | Aug 22, 2013 01:22 | #11 Let me ask you this OP, can you step back and look at these shots and find them acceptable?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Titus213 Cream of the Crop More info | Aug 22, 2013 01:40 | #12 My first opinion is that the colors in the image just don't work. There are too many of them with no cohesion for a portrait. That, along with a very busy setting just adds more for me that doesn't work. You have managed to isolate the kids quite well with exposure and focus although the focus may be a bit thin. Dave
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Spike44 Goldmember 2,155 posts Likes: 3 Joined Dec 2007 More info | Aug 22, 2013 09:25 | #13 Like Dave and osh, I was abit overwhelmed by colour and a tint esp. on the boy. This little guy is so cute, I had to try to tone it down and isolate them more.....
LOG IN TO REPLY |
geparry Member 80 posts Likes: 2 Joined May 2005 Location: Salt Lake City More info | Aug 22, 2013 10:30 | #14 I would check if the lens is front focusing, seems odd that the foreground detail is in such good focus when it is nowhere near where the autofocus should be hunting. Canon 5D MarkIII 24-105 F4 L IS | 100 F2.8 macro| 85mm 1.8 | 70-200 F2.8 L IS MK II | TS-E 40mm 2.8 | 50mm 1.4 | 20mm 2.8 | 300mm 4.0 L IS
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Woolburr Rest in peace old friend. 66,487 posts Gallery: 115 photos Best ofs: 2 Likes: 143 Joined Sep 2005 Location: The Tupperware capitol of eastern Oregon...Leicester, NC! More info | Aug 22, 2013 12:02 | #15 Spike44 wrote in post #16230188 Like Dave and osh, I was abit overwhelmed by colour and a tint esp. on the boy. This little guy is so cute, I had to try to tone it down and isolate them more..... ![]() Bingo! Sometimes color can overwhelm an image. The original version is a perfect example. Lots of the previous comments focused on technical points that really have little or no bearing on this image. The focus and the depth of field are reasonable. Having everything in the image in razor sharp focus is not nearly as important as capturing a "moment". People that know me call me Dan
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Mihai Bucur 1115 guests, 119 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||