beachwithfoorprints
Aug 27, 2013 11:11 | #1 IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com …/58399751@N04/9609387390/ beachwithfoorprints Canon EOS R5, RF 15-35 f/2.8, RF 70-200 f/2.8, RF 50mm f/1.2
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Aug 27, 2013 11:11 | #2 IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com …/58399751@N04/9600207608/ ryanjumping Canon EOS R5, RF 15-35 f/2.8, RF 70-200 f/2.8, RF 50mm f/1.2
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Aug 27, 2013 11:12 | #3 IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com …/58399751@N04/9600207940/ Backfliponbeach Canon EOS R5, RF 15-35 f/2.8, RF 70-200 f/2.8, RF 50mm f/1.2
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Aug 27, 2013 11:12 | #4 IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com …/58399751@N04/9527359284/ IMG_7670-3 Canon EOS R5, RF 15-35 f/2.8, RF 70-200 f/2.8, RF 50mm f/1.2
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Gobeatty Senior Member 513 posts Likes: 3 Joined Aug 2013 More info | Aug 27, 2013 14:57 | #5 Do the trees in the background in the second shot (bike) show a lot of chromatic aberration? Or are my eyes playing tricks? Probably not the response you were looking for. 6D | 35 f2 | 50 1.8 | 85 1.8 | 28 - 135 f3.5 - 5.6 | 70-210 f4
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Azathoth " ...whose name no lips dare speak aloud" More info | Aug 27, 2013 16:13 | #6 jonathanheierle wrote in post #16244295 ![]() Backfliponbeach Really nice. 500px
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Aug 27, 2013 18:44 | #7 I personally find the footprints a distraction. I like to photograph the sea with the tide going out to avoid this Ian
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TeamSpeed 01010100 01010011 More info | Aug 28, 2013 06:33 | #8 Gobeatty wrote in post #16244935 Do the trees in the background in the second shot (bike) show a lot of chromatic aberration? Or are my eyes playing tricks? Probably not the response you were looking for. Everything to do with the lens used, not the camera... Very common for f2.8 on an ultra wide, unfortunately. Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Aug 28, 2013 08:58 | #9 TeamSpeed wrote in post #16246598 Everything to do with the lens used, not the camera... Very common for f2.8 on an ultra wide, unfortunately. Jonathon, on post #3, if you shot that as raw, I would bring the shadows slider up in DPP about 2 spots, and regenerate the JPG. If you can bring the darker sections out just a little (not too much more otherwise you change the mood), it would ratchet up that shot. Great job! unforunately no raw haha, im pretty happy with it only because the original was litterally compeletely black except for the sun Canon EOS R5, RF 15-35 f/2.8, RF 70-200 f/2.8, RF 50mm f/1.2
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TeamSpeed 01010100 01010011 More info | Aug 28, 2013 09:10 | #10 That dynamic range is tough to deal with! Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is SteveeY 1257 guests, 179 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||