savone Goldmember  1,048 posts Likes: 2 Joined Dec 2005 Location: New Jersey More info | Jan 26, 2006 16:34 | #1 This is only my second black and white conversion. I have learned alot from some folks here and a few other forums. Comments, no matter how harsh, are welcome... As long as they have good intentions!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
4nR Senior Member  689 posts Joined Feb 2005 Location: A2, MI More info | Jan 26, 2006 16:48 | #2 You should either crop it more to cut the tree out or (if it was already cropped) try showing more of the photo. i do like how the shadows are cast along the face though and b&w is a great effect for this kind of photo. A560 will have to do... for now
LOG IN TO REPLY |
4nR wrote: You should either crop it more to cut the tree out or (if it was already cropped) try showing more of the photo. i do like how the shadows are cast along the face though and b&w is a great effect for this kind of photo. I thought about cropping the tree out. But the problem is that how it hangs over the house I would never be able to get the whole tree out, so I figured it would stay.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
klmigut Member  199 posts Likes: 5 Joined Dec 2005 Location: Indinanapolis, IN More info | Jan 26, 2006 19:08 | #4 Not sure, I got the crop the way you wanted it, but I did take out the tree hanging over the house.  HOSTED PHOTO please log in to view hosted photos in full size. Kim Migut
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RAitch Goldmember  2,917 posts Likes: 9 Joined Mar 2005 Location: Sarnia Ontario, Canada More info | Jan 26, 2006 19:12 | #5 |
spencer87 Goldmember  1,128 posts Joined Apr 2005 More info | Jan 26, 2006 19:22 | #6 i prefer the original to the cropped version. nice job on this
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Robert_Lay Cream of the Crop  7,546 posts Joined Jul 2005 Location: Spotsylvania Co., VA More info | Jan 26, 2006 19:22 | #7 The composition was better in your original post.  HOSTED PHOTO please log in to view hosted photos in full size. Bob
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Radtech1 Everlasting Gobstopper  6,455 posts Likes: 38 Joined Jun 2003 Location: Trantor More info | As Robert said, his might not have gotten it quite right, and I agree, there was still something a bit disorienting about his. Much better than the original, but still.
 .
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Robert_Lay wrote: The composition was better in your original post. Are you aware of what causes your converging verticals? It's because the camera is being tilted slightly off the horizontal when you took the shot. It may not be possible to get back far enough to avoid that, so the next best approach is to use "perspective correction" in PSCS. It's done with the "crop" tool. Once you lay in the crop selection, there is a checkbox called perspective to be checked. Then follow the instructions for perspective correction. It's easier said than done! I don't think I got it exactly correct, but you should be able to see that the verticals are closer to vertical than they were. Nice robert, thanks for the tip.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Radtech1 wrote: As Robert said, his might not have gotten it quite right, and I agree, there was still something a bit disorienting about his. Much better than the original, but still. What about this. It is a combination of a global perspective and skew adjustment, then individual perspective and skews on the face, roof, and chimney. Rad Looks like I have alot of photoshop work to learn. How bout some input on how this is done??
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2286 guests, 131 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
