This isnt working right now,must return later to figure out the problem.
Aug 30, 2013 05:33 | #1 This isnt working right now,must return later to figure out the problem. I used to think I was indecisive,but now I'm not too sure.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TeamSpeed 01010100 01010011  More info | Aug 30, 2013 10:49 | #2 ItsJustEd wrote in post #16252711  This isnt working right now,must return later to figure out the problem. I think your signature tag line is very fitting. Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Aug 30, 2013 16:39 | #3 You vedy vedy funny man... I used to think I was indecisive,but now I'm not too sure.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Aug 30, 2013 16:41 | #4 This isnt working right now,must return later to figure out the problem.[/QUOTE]  Photo two by EdDorsett, on Flickr Photo one by EdDorsett, on FlickrOK,now this is really starting to chaff my ass. I have posted pics before,its not a biggie. But now all of a sudden I cant get an image to post from my flicker. Copy/paste the HTML code,tried reducing the size,and it still wont post. Somebody save me from the wiles of the technology Im just not grasping! Sorry guys for my scatter brained attempt at trying to post a couple pics for observation,but as you see I FINALLY figured it out,lol. So,my question is,how are these images possible? This is straight from the camera,no editing. The darker one is properly exposed for the shutter speed - the clouds were very bright,so naturally the building was going to be darker. The only thing different in how I took the other pic (the better exposed shot?) is the focal point. In the first Im directly on the small window on top of the building,in the second Im off to the right just a teensy weensy bit. So how is it possible for the camera to capture the better exposed image like this? Im very concerned,and more curious. I used to think I was indecisive,but now I'm not too sure.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
SkipD Cream of the Crop  20,476 posts Likes: 165 Joined Dec 2002 Location: Southeastern WI, USA More info | Aug 30, 2013 16:46 | #5 Are they your images, Ed? Skip Douglas
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Aug 30, 2013 17:01 | #6 SkipD wrote in post #16254378 Are they your images, Ed? Im an idiot,lol!! Went and peeked at a previous post about posting from flicker...Im happy again. And yes,pics are mine. I used to think I was indecisive,but now I'm not too sure.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TeamSpeed 01010100 01010011 More info | Aug 30, 2013 17:07 | #7 So now we have pics, what is the problem? Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Aug 30, 2013 17:09 | #8 ItsJustEd wrote in post #16254361 This isnt working right now,must return later to figure out the problem. Photo two by EdDorsett, on Flickr Photo one by EdDorsett, on FlickrOK,now this is really starting to chaff my ass. I have posted pics before,its not a biggie. But now all of a sudden I cant get an image to post from my flicker. Copy/paste the HTML code,tried reducing the size,and it still wont post. Somebody save me from the wiles of the technology Im just not grasping! Sorry guys for my scatter brained attempt at trying to post a couple pics for observation,but as you see I FINALLY figured it out,lol. So,my question is,how are these images possible? This is straight from the camera,no editing. The darker one is properly exposed for the shutter speed - the clouds were very bright,so naturally the building was going to be darker. The only thing different in how I took the other pic (the better exposed shot?) is the focal point. In the first Im directly on the small window on top of the building,in the second Im off to the right just a teensy weensy bit. So how is it possible for the camera to capture the better exposed image like this? Im very concerned,and more curious. Any insite would be hugely appreciated!! I used to think I was indecisive,but now I'm not too sure.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Aug 30, 2013 17:13 | #9 TeamSpeed wrote in post #16254430 So now we have pics, what is the problem? Not sure if you've noticed but I added information to the images. I used to think I was indecisive,but now I'm not too sure.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TeamSpeed 01010100 01010011 More info | Aug 30, 2013 17:15 | #10 What is the exif for photo two, it has been stripped? Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Aug 30, 2013 17:19 | #11 TeamSpeed wrote in post #16254451 What is the exif for photo two, it has been stripped? What mode were you in (M, Av, etc)? What metering mode were you using? I just peeked on flicker for exif data on both pics,its there. Always shoot in manual. Metering mode in auto. I used to think I was indecisive,but now I'm not too sure.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
CyberDyneSystems Admin (type T-2000)  More info | Aug 30, 2013 17:20 | #12 Metering was weighted towards the center,.. when you moved ever so slightly, more of the church was in the center, rather than the bright sky. GEAR LIST
LOG IN TO REPLY |
CyberDyneSystems Admin (type T-2000) More info | Aug 30, 2013 17:23 | #13 ItsJustEd wrote in post #16254461 I just peeked on flicker for exif data on both pics,its there. Always shoot in manual. Metering mode in auto. Um, Manual... auto metering? I'm confused. GEAR LIST
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Aug 30, 2013 17:23 | #14 CyberDyneSystems wrote in post #16254464 Metering was weighted towards the center,.. when you moved ever so slightly, more of the church was in the center, rather than the bright sky. That little move is all it took to tell the camera you have totally changed what is the important subject. Just a theory, but I think it's the likely cause. Appreciate the input,and Im hoping your right. Really took me by surprise when I looked at my screen and saw how GOOD it turned out! I used to think I was indecisive,but now I'm not too sure.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
TeamSpeed 01010100 01010011 More info | Aug 30, 2013 17:25 | #15 For something that drastic, it would have to be a change in lighting. I can barely make out any shadows in the building in the one, but they are very distinct in the other. That is the only reason I would think 2 shots that were exposed identically would have that difference. If you were in manual, whatever metering mode you had has no bearing on the results. Past Equipment | My Personal Gallery
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is ANebinger 1029 guests, 164 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
