... to take astro shots with a 1Dmkii? I seem to struggle really badly with noise in low light, and have had a couple of unsuccessful attempts at shooting stars.
Any tips on settings, and/or processing would be more than welcome. 
Thanks
beano Goldmember 4,168 posts Likes: 7 Joined May 2006 Location: Berkshire. UK More info | Aug 31, 2013 16:46 | #1 ... to take astro shots with a 1Dmkii? I seem to struggle really badly with noise in low light, and have had a couple of unsuccessful attempts at shooting stars. Scott
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 01, 2013 10:34 | #2 Here's an attempt from last night. Forecast was all lies, and the clouds started coming in as soon as we arrived. Stars Above Surrey Hill Scott
LOG IN TO REPLY |
thejimmy Goldmember 1,426 posts Likes: 33 Joined Dec 2009 Location: west coast of Florida More info | Sep 01, 2013 14:12 | #3 beano wrote in post #16258501 Here's an attempt from last night. Forecast was all lies, and the clouds started coming in as soon as we arrived. ![]() Stars Above Surrey Hill Still, not a bad shot
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 01, 2013 17:14 | #4 Cheers jimmy... Didn't really get time to find a better composition, so had to make do. I'm still trying to get my head round the basics!?! I set the lens to infinity here, but the stars aren't particularly sharp. Not sure if 25 seconds was too long at 17mm? Does anyone know the formula for working that out? Scott
LOG IN TO REPLY |
thejimmy Goldmember 1,426 posts Likes: 33 Joined Dec 2009 Location: west coast of Florida More info | Sep 01, 2013 18:16 | #5 beano wrote in post #16259491 Cheers jimmy... Didn't really get time to find a better composition, so had to make do. I'm still trying to get my head round the basics!?! I set the lens to infinity here, but the stars aren't particularly sharp. Not sure if 25 seconds was too long at 17mm? Does anyone know the formula for working that out? Also. How do you get the stars, and the foreground in focus!?! Do you have to focus stack? When you have both stars and a foreground in the frame this typically means you're using a wide angle lens, which has a large DOF, so "typically" being in focus isn't an issue concerning the foreground.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 02, 2013 15:03 | #6 the jimmy wrote in post #16259625 When you have both stars and a foreground in the frame this typically means you're using a wide angle lens, which has a large DOF, so "typically" being in focus isn't an issue concerning the foreground. Also most lens will focus past infinity, so you really need to focus carefully. Using live view and 5x or 10x magnification on a bright star or planet will allow you to achieve correct focus, then you can compose your shot and start shooting. There is a way to find out how long you can expose with a given focal length before you'll see star trails form, this formula will cover full frame and 1.6 crop bodies. divide 600 by the focal length of the lens = maximum number of seconds before star trails form, for a full frame camera body. For a crop body first convert the lens to the full frame equivalent; ex. 14mm lens x 1.6 = 22.4mm 600 / 22.4 = 26 seconds Ah! Thanks for the info jimmy! Scott
LOG IN TO REPLY |
LevinadeRuijter I'm a bloody goody two-shoes! 23,005 posts Gallery: 457 photos Best ofs: 12 Likes: 15602 Joined Sep 2008 Location: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, EU More info | Sep 02, 2013 15:21 | #7 How about using a Bahtinov Mask Wild Birds of Europe: https://photography-on-the.net …showthread.php?p=19371752
LOG IN TO REPLY |
SteveInNZ Goldmember 1,426 posts Likes: 89 Joined Nov 2007 Location: Auckland, New Zealand More info | Sep 02, 2013 16:10 | #8 Levina de Ruijter wrote in post #16261846 How about using a Bahtinov Mask They work very well but not on short, wide lenses. "Treat every photon with respect" - David Malin.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
LevinadeRuijter I'm a bloody goody two-shoes! 23,005 posts Gallery: 457 photos Best ofs: 12 Likes: 15602 Joined Sep 2008 Location: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, EU More info | Sep 02, 2013 18:21 | #9 Ah right. Glad you read it and corrected me! Wild Birds of Europe: https://photography-on-the.net …showthread.php?p=19371752
LOG IN TO REPLY |
SteveInNZ Goldmember 1,426 posts Likes: 89 Joined Nov 2007 Location: Auckland, New Zealand More info | Sep 02, 2013 22:30 | #10 I should quantify that. In my experience, they are no use at all below about 50mm focal length and between 50-200mm you can do just as well with live-view, zoomed in on a bright star or planet. "Treat every photon with respect" - David Malin.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
LevinadeRuijter I'm a bloody goody two-shoes! 23,005 posts Gallery: 457 photos Best ofs: 12 Likes: 15602 Joined Sep 2008 Location: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, EU More info | Sep 02, 2013 23:20 | #11 SteveInNZ wrote in post #16262902 I should quantify that. In my experience, they are no use at all below about 50mm focal length and between 50-200mm you can do just as well with live-view, zoomed in on a bright star or planet. There's no live view on a 1D Mk II. Wild Birds of Europe: https://photography-on-the.net …showthread.php?p=19371752
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 06, 2013 14:42 | #12 Thanks for the tips everyone, much appreciated! Scott
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is semonsters 1055 guests, 102 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||