Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Birds 
Thread started 01 Sep 2013 (Sunday) 07:05
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Greater/Lesser Yellow Legs?

 
Eastcoast
Goldmember
Avatar
1,580 posts
Gallery: 21 photos
Likes: 1008
Joined Jan 2004
Location: Dartmouth, Nova Scotia Canada
     
Sep 01, 2013 07:05 |  #1

So, suffering from lens envy and seeing that Ian (Wallace River) could shoot 1000mm, decided to take the Bigma out and put on my 2x multiplier. It's a beast, jumps immediately to f13 and the manual focus is touchy, touchy, touchy!

It also appears that there not much DOF wide open when the subject is at close range. I didn't want to stop down as I was running ISO 2500 all ready. This is not at 1000mm but at 730mm f/13 1/1000. Also discovered very quickly that the RC4 Ball Head is probably not adequate for this as it tends to shift after locking down so that you have to guess where the image will drift once you let go of the adjusting knobs.

If anyone out there want to share tips on how to best use a set up such as this please do! I am encouraged to pursue this more as it will allow me to fill more of the screen with subject and not have to try and get as close. I have always shot using autofocus, and it is fairly time consuming to try and use the live view and zoom function to get sharp focus and manage to get the picture taken before the subject moves. I am also using a remote to try and keep from bouncing the camera.

So to summarize, camera was a 6D with a Sigma 50-500mm f/5.6 Bigma and X2 doubler on a Manfrotto 190 XPro B and a RC-4 Ballhead. Equipment upgrade suggestions welcome, but I cannot do a 500/600mm prime (at least at this time) :lol:.

So enough with being long winded, here's the image. Oh, yes was taken about 5 minutes after sunrise.

Any and all comments/suggestions welcome.

Umm, am aware of the crappy composition, but that's what I was left with after straightening. It was almost full frame with virtually nothing left for cropping.

Tks.

IMAGE: http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v335/eastcoast909/EOS%206D/Yellowlegs.jpg~original
IMAGE LINK: http://smg.photobucket​.com …%206D/Yellowleg​s.jpg.html  (external link)

John
Canon R5 and some Canon glass
Be careful out there!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CMOats
Goldmember
Avatar
1,901 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 8
Joined Sep 2008
Location: Mallorytown, Ontario, Canada
     
Sep 01, 2013 07:22 |  #2

Very nice John! Too bad the reflection is cut off, but I realize you had nothing left to crop... bird is 'perfect'!!


Cheryl
Canon 5D Mark II, 1D Mark III, G12 & some cool lenses;)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
2n10
Cream of the Crop
17,097 posts
Gallery: 81 photos
Likes: 1222
Joined Sep 2012
Location: Sparks, Nevada, USA
     
Sep 01, 2013 07:23 |  #3

Very nice job, I think it is a Greater Yellowlegs because the bill looks upturned.


John
Equipment
My Portfolio (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wallace ­ River
" ...a bit of a pervy voyeur "
Avatar
12,777 posts
Gallery: 167 photos
Best ofs: 6
Likes: 4273
Joined Jul 2010
Location: Wallace, Nova Scotia
     
Sep 01, 2013 08:58 as a reply to  @ 2n10's post |  #4

Nothing wrong with that, despite your ballhead issue. I was actually using a ballhead on the Kingfisher, but it was a RRS BH55 and it holds my camera and lenses rock steady. If you really like using ballheads, consider that one - I picked mine up used. I really prefer using the Wimberly II gimbal, but just got lazy that day and didn't switch it over before heading out.


IAN - Living life on the shores of the Wallace River in northern Nova Scotia, Canada :
Canon 1D4, 1D-X, 1D-X II, almost enough glass.
My Flickr (external link).

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lester ­ Wareham
Moderator
Avatar
33,007 posts
Gallery: 3035 photos
Best ofs: 5
Likes: 47146
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Hampshire, UK
     
Sep 01, 2013 12:19 |  #5

Excellent shot John, great manual focus skills.


Gear List
FAQ on UV and Clear Protective Filters
Macrophotography by LordV
flickr (external link) Flickr Home (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Evan
Goldmember
Avatar
1,327 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Jun 2009
Location: Oregon
     
Sep 01, 2013 16:31 |  #6

It is a Greater Yellowlegs. The reason that it is a greater is because the bill is 1.5 head widths in length. It barely looks like that in this picture, but you have to take in that the head is angling away, which creates shortening of the bill. On a Lesser Yellowlegs, the bill is exactly one head width in length. (head width measured directly back from the base of the bill, to the back of the head). Another detail is that in general (this really can depend on what the bird is doing with its feathers so not 100% like the bill), Greater Yellowlegs and much deeper bodied than the lesser. I wouldn't rely on the deepness of the bird's body unless you first learn to tell the body size difference with a lesser and greater next to each other. However, bill length does not require that you have both species next to each other as you have the head to estimate the size.

Hope this helps,


--
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Eastcoast
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,580 posts
Gallery: 21 photos
Likes: 1008
Joined Jan 2004
Location: Dartmouth, Nova Scotia Canada
     
Sep 01, 2013 18:56 |  #7

Thanks, CMOats. At the time my eyes were tearing so much I could hardly focus, let alone tell how much I had in FOV. I find my eyes are becoming more light sensitive and I have to move my glasses to see whats in the viewfinder.

2N10, BirdBoy; thanks for the id, I try to remember these tips on the next one. Still using a bird book and oftentimes it really doesn't look like the example.

Ian and Lester, thanks for the kind words.

The ball head is a Manfrotto 498RC4 and when the friction knob for the swivel is loosened off then the whole assembly can rock. Of course at full zoom this can affect what is in the FOV. Not a big problem with a 17-40mm shooting landscape but a entirely different kettle of fish with a long lens on.


John
Canon R5 and some Canon glass
Be careful out there!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

802 views & 0 likes for this thread, 6 members have posted to it.
Greater/Lesser Yellow Legs?
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Birds 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1470 guests, 133 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.