I'd like to know how many photos you can get onto a 512MB CF card . Apparently 64 of the highest resolution but on the other 2 settings? (i'm wondering how many 512's i should get?)
tikkeltokkel Member 82 posts Joined Jun 2003 More info | Jul 05, 2003 11:16 | #1 I'd like to know how many photos you can get onto a 512MB CF card . Apparently 64 of the highest resolution but on the other 2 settings? (i'm wondering how many 512's i should get?)
LOG IN TO REPLY |
PaulB Goldmember 1,543 posts Likes: 2 Joined Apr 2003 Location: Leeds, Yorkshire More info | Jul 05, 2003 11:29 | #2 I use 256Mb cards at the moment and my 10D says 95 best quality JPEGs (Large/fine) at ISO200.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jul 05, 2003 12:09 | #3 I get 179 highest quality JPEGs on my 512 sandisk at 400 ISO. Chuck
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jul 05, 2003 12:28 | #4 socal69 wrote: I get 179 highest quality JPEGs on my 512 sandisk at 400 ISO. How many 100 iso jpegs or RAW or tiffs do you get and how many "middle" quality jpegs do you get?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DaveI Member 33 posts Joined Jul 2003 More info | Jul 05, 2003 12:47 | #5 The shots remaining counter seems fairly accurate. It shows the following on my 1GB card (divide by 2 for 512):
LOG IN TO REPLY |
UK_Terry Senior Member 630 posts Joined Mar 2002 Location: Wiltshire England More info | Jul 05, 2003 14:24 | #6 Mine says 57 RAW, but that is with embedded jpg on highest setting. UK_Terry
LOG IN TO REPLY |
boyhowdy Member 233 posts Joined Jun 2003 More info | Jul 05, 2003 15:12 | #7 I get 77-80 shots on my Lexar 40X 512mb card with RAW and jpeg set to small and lowest quality. I don't care at all about the jpg files. At ISO 100 it is 80 shots. At ISO 200 it is 77 shots and at ISO 400 it is 76 shots.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Jul 05, 2003 17:07 | #8 tikkeltokkel wrote: socal69 wrote: I get 179 highest quality JPEGs on my 512 sandisk at 400 ISO. How many 100 iso jpegs or RAW or tiffs do you get and how many "middle" quality jpegs do you get? To be honest, I haven't really paid attention. I seem to recall that I get about 70 or so in RAW, also with embedded high quality JPEGS (I could be wrong about this number though). So far I have mostly shot high res JPEGs, and have never shot lower res than that. My ISO is pretty much set on 400, and I don't really pay much attention to my counter if I do change it, so I can't help with the various ISO settings. Chuck
LOG IN TO REPLY |
BerendL.deMeyer Hatchling 1 post Joined Jul 2003 More info | Jul 09, 2003 14:43 | #9 Hi,
LOG IN TO REPLY |
rdenney Rick "who is not suited for any one title" Denney 2,400 posts Likes: 3 Joined Jun 2003 More info | Jul 09, 2003 15:28 | #10 Berend L. de Meyer wrote: Hi, Is the 512Mb/40x (WA) already compatible with the 10D? On the Lexar site Cano is not mentioned. Greetz Yes, it is compatible with the 10D, but the 10D does not support WA, which is probably why they don't mention it. I have a Lexar 1-Gig card that supports WA, and it works fine in my 10D. It would be faster in a camera that supported WA.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
CyberDyneSystems Admin (type T-2000) More info | Jul 09, 2003 15:36 | #11 Yes Rick,. The D100 is the only Camera I know that "does the WA Thang" GEAR LIST
LOG IN TO REPLY |
larshkj Member More info | Jul 10, 2003 02:47 | #12 I think it depends a lot on the details in images you shoot. I've seen that my images vary from 1400 kB to over 3000 kB per image (all taken with 100 iso and in the P setting).
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Thunderstream 1039 guests, 119 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||