Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 03 Sep 2013 (Tuesday) 14:34
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

B&W Neg to B&W Print

 
JimTx
Senior Member
317 posts
Joined Feb 2008
Location: Near Dallas Texas
     
Sep 03, 2013 14:34 |  #1

Is it possible to make a B&W print from a B&W Neg with photoshop

Thanks,

Jim


Equipment : Canon 50D, Canon 50-250, Sigma 24-70 2.8, Sigma 70-200 2.8, Sigma 150-500, Canon FS300 Camcorder

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 570
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
Sep 03, 2013 15:03 |  #2

If you don't have a scanner, you could find a scanning "service" to produce an image...


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BigAl007
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,119 posts
Gallery: 556 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 1682
Joined Dec 2010
Location: Repps cum Bastwick, Gt Yarmouth, Norfolk, UK.
     
Sep 03, 2013 16:18 |  #3

Well of course the easy way to get a print from a negative is to have it printed. Personaly I think that a good traditional silver halide B&W print is far better than anything that coming out of an inkjet printer. If you only want the one print it would be by far the best quality/price ratio too. Getting good quality scans from negatives at decent resolutions can be pretty expensive. Knowing the format of the negative would help, larger format negs make it easier to get a scan with enough pixels for a reasonable size print. You might even be able to get good results with a medium format neg using a transparancy adapter on a flat bed scanner.

Alan


alanevans.co.uk (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gonzogolf
dumb remark memorialized
30,917 posts
Gallery: 561 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 14911
Joined Dec 2006
     
Sep 03, 2013 16:25 |  #4

BigAl007 wrote in post #16265108 (external link)
Well of course the easy way to get a print from a negative is to have it printed. Personaly I think that a good traditional silver halide B&W print is far better than anything that coming out of an inkjet printer. If you only want the one print it would be by far the best quality/price ratio too. Getting good quality scans from negatives at decent resolutions can be pretty expensive. Knowing the format of the negative would help, larger format negs make it easier to get a scan with enough pixels for a reasonable size print. You might even be able to get good results with a medium format neg using a transparancy adapter on a flat bed scanner.

Alan

Not so easy any more. Unless you have a lab. Most towns dont have local black and white printing services anymore.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sjones
Goldmember
Avatar
2,261 posts
Likes: 249
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Chicago
     
Sep 03, 2013 17:02 as a reply to  @ gonzogolf's post |  #5

As mentioned, scanning a black & white negative and then using Photoshop for processing is certainly possible; it's the way I've been doing my photography since 2008. To note, recently picked up an enlarger, so I'm going the direction of wet prints, but I digress…

As I scanned my own negatives, I don't have any recommended services, but they exists, and you should be able to find some good info online should you go that route.

And just to add, you can actually make a negative from a digital file by first inkjet printing the inverse image on a transparency sheet, using this as a negative to make a contact or silver halide print.

Anyway, just this past week, Ilford announced the opening of a B&W developing and printing lab in the US (yes, opening, not closing!):
More information:

http://www.ilfordlab-us.com/ (external link)
http://www.ilfordphoto​.com/pressroom/article​.asp?n=171 (external link)


May 2022-January 2023 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bob_A
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,745 posts
Gallery: 48 photos
Likes: 204
Joined Jan 2005
Location: Alberta, Canada
     
Sep 03, 2013 20:14 |  #6

For B&W I'd recommend scanning if the negative isn't in pristine shape even if you had a wet lab available. Photoshop has excellent tools to repair emulsion problems and scratches where if you do wet chem you'd either have to live with the issues or get pretty creative with using a spotting brush. :)

One big difference between scanning B&W and color is that for color Digital ICE software can usually do a good job eliminating dust and scratches. There's no software that works automatically (during the scan process) for B&W. Even the dust and scratches filter in PS does a poor job in areas with detail, but certainly speeds up fixing out of focus areas.

I've printed high quality (and repaired) scans of B&W and color negatives with excellent results. These were scanned to TIF using a high quality dedicated negative scanner with multi-sampling.


Bob
SmugMug (external link) | My Gear Ratings | My POTN Gallery

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BigAl007
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,119 posts
Gallery: 556 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 1682
Joined Dec 2010
Location: Repps cum Bastwick, Gt Yarmouth, Norfolk, UK.
     
Sep 05, 2013 08:31 |  #7

If figured that if you would have to send the neg away to be scaned would offer the same level of risk in sending it to have it printed. As many labs scan the neg and effectivly use a digital enlarger you may be able to get a digital file at the same time.

Alan


alanevans.co.uk (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

779 views & 0 likes for this thread, 6 members have posted to it.
B&W Neg to B&W Print
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is ANebinger
1097 guests, 174 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.