Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Astronomy & Celestial 
Thread started 05 Sep 2013 (Thursday) 22:52
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Bulb Exposure Metering?

 
cdifoto
Don't get pissy with me
Avatar
34,090 posts
Likes: 44
Joined Dec 2005
     
Sep 05, 2013 22:52 |  #1

I never got into night shooting that requires the bulb mode. I'm not doing star trails but I'm wondering how you meter for those extra a long exposures.


Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here (external link). Cursing at your worse-than-a-map reflector? Check out this vid! (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
frugivore
Goldmember
3,089 posts
Gallery: 11 photos
Likes: 118
Joined Aug 2010
Location: Toronto, Canada
     
Sep 05, 2013 23:19 |  #2

cdifoto wrote in post #16271947 (external link)
I never got into night shooting that requires the bulb mode. I'm not doing star trails but I'm wondering how you meter for those extra a long exposures.

I see that many exposures in this sub forum are 30s or under with high ISO, so maybe non-bulb expsure and just chimp it?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
the ­ jimmy
Goldmember
Avatar
1,426 posts
Likes: 33
Joined Dec 2009
Location: west coast of Florida
     
Sep 06, 2013 11:34 as a reply to  @ frugivore's post |  #3

Agree with the others, you don't want to use the meter as it would be ineffective. Set your aperture and shutter and try. Also turn off the lens IS, and most turn off long exposure noise reduction and high ISO noise reduction in your custom function menu. This is especially true for astro photos. Try different settings, experimenting is part of the fun and learning process.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cdifoto
THREAD ­ STARTER
Don't get pissy with me
Avatar
34,090 posts
Likes: 44
Joined Dec 2005
     
Sep 06, 2013 13:40 |  #4

Thanks. I know how to do long exposures via trial & error. I just prefer to not do it that way if I can help it. I don't want to experiment and play, I want to set up a shot and take it the first time around. :D


Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here (external link). Cursing at your worse-than-a-map reflector? Check out this vid! (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gonzogolf
dumb remark memorialized
30,919 posts
Gallery: 561 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 14913
Joined Dec 2006
     
Sep 06, 2013 13:48 |  #5

cdifoto wrote in post #16273678 (external link)
Thanks. I know how to do long exposures via trial & error. I just prefer to not do it that way if I can help it. I don't want to experiment and play, I want to set up a shot and take it the first time around. :D

The problem with that is most long exposure shots, at least night shots, proper exposure is a subjective thing. Do I want a totally black sky, do I want the lights on the bridge to blow out while I save the cables against the dark sky, or do the lights take precedence over the cables? Its not like there is an 18% gray in those scenes, if you have that then you can spot meter with a handheld meter.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cdifoto
THREAD ­ STARTER
Don't get pissy with me
Avatar
34,090 posts
Likes: 44
Joined Dec 2005
     
Sep 06, 2013 13:58 |  #6

gonzogolf wrote in post #16273704 (external link)
The problem with that is most long exposure shots, at least night shots, proper exposure is a subjective thing. Do I want a totally black sky, do I want the lights on the bridge to blow out while I save the cables against the dark sky, or do the lights take precedence over the cables? Its not like there is an 18% gray in those scenes, if you have that then you can spot meter with a handheld meter.

Right, but the fact that you can make night look like day with a long enough shutter speed tells me that there's got to be a way to measure it without taking a photo first. Not many scenes have an actual 18% grey target in them even during the day...you just have to find a known value and adjust for it (find something white, something black, or use the grass to get closer).

I'm hoping to take the guesswork out of knowing exactly how long to hold that button down. My handheld meter won't read anything that low.


Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here (external link). Cursing at your worse-than-a-map reflector? Check out this vid! (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mesmer
Goldmember
Avatar
1,137 posts
Gallery: 101 photos
Best ofs: 3
Likes: 1032
Joined Oct 2007
     
Sep 06, 2013 14:06 |  #7

the jimmy wrote in post #16273351 (external link)
and most turn off long exposure noise reduction and high ISO noise reduction in your custom function menu. This is especially true for astro photos.

Why is this?


InstaGram (external link) Flickr (external link) | 5DmkIII | Samyang 24 1.4 | 35 2.0is | 100L 2.8 Macro | 16-35L F4IS | 24-105L | 70-200L 2.8 II | 300L 4.0is | E640 | Speedlites

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gonzogolf
dumb remark memorialized
30,919 posts
Gallery: 561 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 14913
Joined Dec 2006
     
Sep 06, 2013 14:09 |  #8

cdifoto wrote in post #16273737 (external link)
Right, but the fact that you can make night look like day with a long enough shutter speed tells me that there's got to be a way to measure it without taking a photo first. Not many scenes have an actual 18% grey target in them even during the day...you just have to find a known value and adjust for it (find something white, something black, or use the grass to get closer).

I'm hoping to take the guesswork out of knowing exactly how long to hold that button down. My handheld meter won't read anything that low.

Just raise the ISO and then count stops, or use a chart. For each stop in ISO double the time.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
frugivore
Goldmember
3,089 posts
Gallery: 11 photos
Likes: 118
Joined Aug 2010
Location: Toronto, Canada
     
Sep 06, 2013 15:27 |  #9

gonzogolf wrote in post #16273767 (external link)
Just raise the ISO and then count stops, or use a chart. For each stop in ISO double the time.

Do you mean use live view to judge exposure? That's a good idea. So if you want to shoot at ISO 100, and a 30s exposure at a given f-stop requires that you shoot at ISO 400 according to live view, you would set exposure time to 120s and bump ISO down again, right?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gonzogolf
dumb remark memorialized
30,919 posts
Gallery: 561 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 14913
Joined Dec 2006
     
Sep 06, 2013 16:28 |  #10

frugivore wrote in post #16274026 (external link)
Do you mean use live view to judge exposure? That's a good idea. So if you want to shoot at ISO 100, and a 30s exposure at a given f-stop requires that you shoot at ISO 400 according to live view, you would set exposure time to 120s and bump ISO down again, right?

No, what I meant was set your meter to iso 3200 or whatever so that it might possibly at least read the existing light within the time parameter limit that your meter will work at. For instance is your meter ceases to work at times longer than 30 seconds or a minute. By raising the ISO in the meter you can get the time value to at least read in the meter. Then you can do the math and extrapolate for longer times.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
morph2_7
Goldmember
1,112 posts
Joined Sep 2012
Location: Los Angeles
     
Sep 06, 2013 17:00 |  #11

gonzogolf wrote in post #16273767 (external link)
Just raise the ISO and then count stops, or use a chart. For each stop in ISO double the time.

That's a good idea. Let's see if I get this right. If it meters 10 sec at ISO1600, I need 20 sec at ISO800 or 40 sec at ISO400 and so on, right?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mesmer
Goldmember
Avatar
1,137 posts
Gallery: 101 photos
Best ofs: 3
Likes: 1032
Joined Oct 2007
     
Sep 06, 2013 17:07 |  #12

morph2_7 wrote in post #16274314 (external link)
That's a good idea. Let's see if I get this right. If it meters 10 sec at ISO1600, I need 20 sec at ISO800 or 40 sec at ISO400 and so on, right?

Correct


InstaGram (external link) Flickr (external link) | 5DmkIII | Samyang 24 1.4 | 35 2.0is | 100L 2.8 Macro | 16-35L F4IS | 24-105L | 70-200L 2.8 II | 300L 4.0is | E640 | Speedlites

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
frugivore
Goldmember
3,089 posts
Gallery: 11 photos
Likes: 118
Joined Aug 2010
Location: Toronto, Canada
     
Sep 06, 2013 17:32 |  #13

gonzogolf wrote in post #16274229 (external link)
No, what I meant was set your meter to iso 3200 or whatever so that it might possibly at least read the existing light within the time parameter limit that your meter will work at. For instance is your meter ceases to work at times longer than 30 seconds or a minute. By raising the ISO in the meter you can get the time value to at least read in the meter. Then you can do the math and extrapolate for longer times.

OK. I was assuming that we were metering a scene below the camera'metering limit (i.e. under 1 EV).




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
the ­ jimmy
Goldmember
Avatar
1,426 posts
Likes: 33
Joined Dec 2009
Location: west coast of Florida
     
Sep 06, 2013 19:09 |  #14

Mesmer wrote in post #16273757 (external link)
Why is this?

The camera is trying to reduce the noise, which most people prefer to do themselves in post processing, and if you're going to be stacking photo's then this process doubles your exposure time. Say if you're shooting at 20 sec, after the exposure the camera takes another 20 seconds to process the pic. If you're taking a number of exposures then this can add in a lot of time. Nothing is written in stone here, try and experiment for yourself, you may prefer your own technique.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Heath
Goldmember
Avatar
2,332 posts
Joined Sep 2009
Location: NYC, NY
     
Sep 06, 2013 19:14 |  #15

I do this.
http://www.thenightsky​e.com …/images/High-ISO-test.pdf (external link)


Heath
"Some photographers push the envelope. Some sit behind a keyboard and criticize their accomplishments." (seen in the comments of a photo article)
Blog (external link)-Twitter (external link)-Zenfolio (external link)-500px (external link)-Pinterest (external link)-Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,002 views & 0 likes for this thread, 8 members have posted to it.
Bulb Exposure Metering?
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Astronomy & Celestial 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
1613 guests, 141 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.