I never got into night shooting that requires the bulb mode. I'm not doing star trails but I'm wondering how you meter for those extra a long exposures.
cdifoto Don't get pissy with me 34,090 posts Likes: 44 Joined Dec 2005 More info | Sep 05, 2013 22:52 | #1 I never got into night shooting that requires the bulb mode. I'm not doing star trails but I'm wondering how you meter for those extra a long exposures. Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 05, 2013 23:19 | #2 cdifoto wrote in post #16271947 I never got into night shooting that requires the bulb mode. I'm not doing star trails but I'm wondering how you meter for those extra a long exposures. I see that many exposures in this sub forum are 30s or under with high ISO, so maybe non-bulb expsure and just chimp it?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
thejimmy Goldmember 1,426 posts Likes: 33 Joined Dec 2009 Location: west coast of Florida More info | Agree with the others, you don't want to use the meter as it would be ineffective. Set your aperture and shutter and try. Also turn off the lens IS, and most turn off long exposure noise reduction and high ISO noise reduction in your custom function menu. This is especially true for astro photos. Try different settings, experimenting is part of the fun and learning process.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 06, 2013 13:40 | #4 Thanks. I know how to do long exposures via trial & error. I just prefer to not do it that way if I can help it. I don't want to experiment and play, I want to set up a shot and take it the first time around. Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here
LOG IN TO REPLY |
gonzogolf dumb remark memorialized More info | Sep 06, 2013 13:48 | #5 cdifoto wrote in post #16273678 Thanks. I know how to do long exposures via trial & error. I just prefer to not do it that way if I can help it. I don't want to experiment and play, I want to set up a shot and take it the first time around. ![]() The problem with that is most long exposure shots, at least night shots, proper exposure is a subjective thing. Do I want a totally black sky, do I want the lights on the bridge to blow out while I save the cables against the dark sky, or do the lights take precedence over the cables? Its not like there is an 18% gray in those scenes, if you have that then you can spot meter with a handheld meter.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 06, 2013 13:58 | #6 gonzogolf wrote in post #16273704 The problem with that is most long exposure shots, at least night shots, proper exposure is a subjective thing. Do I want a totally black sky, do I want the lights on the bridge to blow out while I save the cables against the dark sky, or do the lights take precedence over the cables? Its not like there is an 18% gray in those scenes, if you have that then you can spot meter with a handheld meter. Right, but the fact that you can make night look like day with a long enough shutter speed tells me that there's got to be a way to measure it without taking a photo first. Not many scenes have an actual 18% grey target in them even during the day...you just have to find a known value and adjust for it (find something white, something black, or use the grass to get closer). Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 06, 2013 14:06 | #7 the jimmy wrote in post #16273351 and most turn off long exposure noise reduction and high ISO noise reduction in your custom function menu. This is especially true for astro photos. Why is this? InstaGram
LOG IN TO REPLY |
gonzogolf dumb remark memorialized More info | Sep 06, 2013 14:09 | #8 cdifoto wrote in post #16273737 Right, but the fact that you can make night look like day with a long enough shutter speed tells me that there's got to be a way to measure it without taking a photo first. Not many scenes have an actual 18% grey target in them even during the day...you just have to find a known value and adjust for it (find something white, something black, or use the grass to get closer). I'm hoping to take the guesswork out of knowing exactly how long to hold that button down. My handheld meter won't read anything that low. Just raise the ISO and then count stops, or use a chart. For each stop in ISO double the time.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 06, 2013 15:27 | #9 gonzogolf wrote in post #16273767 Just raise the ISO and then count stops, or use a chart. For each stop in ISO double the time. Do you mean use live view to judge exposure? That's a good idea. So if you want to shoot at ISO 100, and a 30s exposure at a given f-stop requires that you shoot at ISO 400 according to live view, you would set exposure time to 120s and bump ISO down again, right?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
gonzogolf dumb remark memorialized More info | Sep 06, 2013 16:28 | #10 frugivore wrote in post #16274026 Do you mean use live view to judge exposure? That's a good idea. So if you want to shoot at ISO 100, and a 30s exposure at a given f-stop requires that you shoot at ISO 400 according to live view, you would set exposure time to 120s and bump ISO down again, right? No, what I meant was set your meter to iso 3200 or whatever so that it might possibly at least read the existing light within the time parameter limit that your meter will work at. For instance is your meter ceases to work at times longer than 30 seconds or a minute. By raising the ISO in the meter you can get the time value to at least read in the meter. Then you can do the math and extrapolate for longer times.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
morph2_7 Goldmember 1,112 posts Joined Sep 2012 Location: Los Angeles More info | Sep 06, 2013 17:00 | #11 gonzogolf wrote in post #16273767 Just raise the ISO and then count stops, or use a chart. For each stop in ISO double the time. That's a good idea. Let's see if I get this right. If it meters 10 sec at ISO1600, I need 20 sec at ISO800 or 40 sec at ISO400 and so on, right?
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 06, 2013 17:07 | #12 morph2_7 wrote in post #16274314 That's a good idea. Let's see if I get this right. If it meters 10 sec at ISO1600, I need 20 sec at ISO800 or 40 sec at ISO400 and so on, right? Correct InstaGram
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Sep 06, 2013 17:32 | #13 gonzogolf wrote in post #16274229 No, what I meant was set your meter to iso 3200 or whatever so that it might possibly at least read the existing light within the time parameter limit that your meter will work at. For instance is your meter ceases to work at times longer than 30 seconds or a minute. By raising the ISO in the meter you can get the time value to at least read in the meter. Then you can do the math and extrapolate for longer times. OK. I was assuming that we were metering a scene below the camera'metering limit (i.e. under 1 EV).
LOG IN TO REPLY |
thejimmy Goldmember 1,426 posts Likes: 33 Joined Dec 2009 Location: west coast of Florida More info | Sep 06, 2013 19:09 | #14 Mesmer wrote in post #16273757 Why is this? The camera is trying to reduce the noise, which most people prefer to do themselves in post processing, and if you're going to be stacking photo's then this process doubles your exposure time. Say if you're shooting at 20 sec, after the exposure the camera takes another 20 seconds to process the pic. If you're taking a number of exposures then this can add in a lot of time. Nothing is written in stone here, try and experiment for yourself, you may prefer your own technique.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is semonsters 1613 guests, 141 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||