Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 09 Sep 2013 (Monday) 15:44
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

DPP? ACR? Lightroom?

 
sancho1983
Goldmember
Avatar
1,214 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 289
Joined Jan 2009
     
Sep 09, 2013 15:44 |  #1

At the moment I use bridge to import the pictures from my camera into a folder on my desktop (I shoot RAW only), I import them into Lightroom 5 (open Lightroom, import all pics in recently created folder), go through and 'reject' poor ones. Remove rejected photos.

Then I take each photo in turn, crop if needed, sharpen and use noise reduction, move levels around/curves/presets. After each photo has been edited I select them all and put them in a folder named 'edited' within the previously created folder.

Is there a more effective way to do this? I see people dicsussing ACR and DPP, what are they using these for? Just applying sharpening and noise reduction and then export to Lightroom/CSx? Or to do everything I am doing?

Any tips would be gratefully received, thanks in advance.


Instagram (external link)
Https://bgsweddings.co​.uk (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tzalman
Fatal attraction.
Avatar
13,497 posts
Likes: 213
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Gesher Haziv, Israel
     
Sep 09, 2013 17:08 |  #2

ACR is the Raw developer in Photoshop CSS. It is virtually identical to the Develop module in Lightroom. A somewhat emasculated "light" version is in Photoshop Elements. DPP is the converter supplied by Canon. It has pluses and minuses; on one hand it is easy for beginners and faster because it requires less user input. On the other hand, because it needs less input it provides less scope for creativity. It has a much smaller tool set than LR and because of this a larger percentage of images will need further editing in a second application .

P.S. I personally would not use DPP because it does not utilize the full DR of the Raw capture, an important aspect of my photography. For other types of photography this might not be a hindrance.


Elie / אלי

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Dan ­ Marchant
Do people actually believe in the Title Fairy?
Avatar
5,634 posts
Gallery: 19 photos
Likes: 2056
Joined Oct 2011
Location: Where I'm from is unimportant, it's where I'm going that counts.
     
Sep 09, 2013 17:57 |  #3

sancho1983 wrote in post #16282495 (external link)
...Is there a more effective way to do this?

Sorry to laugh but I have a vision of you hunched over a steam powered computer with spinning wheels, levers, ramps and other bizarre attachments. I am pretty sure Heath Robinson could devise a workflow which would be less needlessly complex.

I would....
1. Stop using Bridge & Lightroom. LR can do everything you need.

2. Stop creating three folders and moving images from folder to folder when just one folder will suffice.

Watch at least the first four of these videos on how to import and organise images in LR http://tv.adobe.com …be-photoshop-lightroom-5/ (external link)

I see people dicsussing ACR and DPP, what are they using these for?

They are RAW development software, similar to Lightroom. ACR has the same RAW development features that Lightroom has and ships as part of Photoshop. DPP is Canon's RAW development software. They each have their own unique features but all have basically similar functionality.


Dan Marchant
Website/blog: danmarchant.com (external link)
Instagram: @dan_marchant (external link)
Gear Canon 5DIII + Fuji X-T2 + lenses + a plastic widget I found in the camera box.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Pagman
I just hold the thing :-)
Avatar
10,853 posts
Gallery: 2805 photos
Likes: 18215
Joined Dec 2011
     
Sep 09, 2013 18:52 |  #4

Can I chime in here please - I too have been using DPP almost idependently for raw workflow before doing further tweaks in other PP sites like FastStone, I now have LR3 and I use to adjust not only recent files just converted from raw via DPP to Jpeg, but also all my older Jpegs that have been worked and re worked several times, I have noticed a file converted to tiff in DPP cant be opened in LR as It doesnt find it and says its missing, so to follow on from above - does using DPP alongside LR make no sense?, even if just for conversion to Jpeg with sharpening/noise etc, then doing the rest in LR.
Or can I pack my DPP away now and just use mt LR3 for everything?


P.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 569
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
Sep 09, 2013 21:51 |  #5

Well, first off, to the OP, I use Lightroom to Import from my card/reader, I see no reason to resort to Bridge for that. If you aren't familiar enough with the Lightroom Import module to do what you do quickly and painlessly, well, speak up!

Pagman wrote in post #16283082 (external link)
Can I chime in here please - I too have been using DPP almost idependently for raw workflow before doing further tweaks in other PP sites like FastStone, I now have LR3 and I use to adjust not only recent files just converted from raw via DPP to Jpeg, but also all my older Jpegs that have been worked and re worked several times, I have noticed a file converted to tiff in DPP cant be opened in LR as It doesnt find it and says its missing, so to follow on from above - does using DPP alongside LR make no sense?, even if just for conversion to Jpeg with sharpening/noise etc, then doing the rest in LR.
Or can I pack my DPP away now and just use mt LR3 for everything?P.

Now something that people need to understand:

Different Raw processors will be incompatible with each other in regards to, well, the Raw processing! Now if you have compatible versions of Camera Raw in your photoshop (that's the "ACR" the op was asking about) and your version of Lightroom, well, they actually can share/play together because they both use the same Raw processing "engine". But DPP is a different beast altogether! If you work on a Raw image in DPP, the work you do won't show up in Lightroom (or Camera Raw). So, in practice, choose one Raw processor, do your "development" in it, then if you want or need to bring the image into, say, Lightroom from DPP you will need to do a convert/save and bring it into Lightroom as a tiff.

To the OP, "DPP" stands for the Canon Raw software Digital Photo Professional. It can be a cool app to get started with, but if you do have Lightroom then I'd suggest sticking with that!


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tzalman
Fatal attraction.
Avatar
13,497 posts
Likes: 213
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Gesher Haziv, Israel
     
Sep 10, 2013 01:59 |  #6

Pagman wrote in post #16283082 (external link)
Can I chime in here ....does using DPP alongside LR make no sense?, even if just for conversion to Jpeg with sharpening/noise etc, then doing the rest in LR.
Or can I pack my DPP away now and just use mt LR3 for everything?


P.

No sense at all. LR, even LR3, can do far more than DPP and Faststone and another dozen like it together and can do it far better because it is doing it in 16 bit linear wide gamut rather than 8 bit screwed up narrow gamut jpgs. I would advise upgrading to LR4 for its much better DR in landscapes.

Unless you are making a mistake, there is no reason why LR wouldn't import tiffs. Hundreds do it everyday, outputting a tiff for editing in PS or a plugin and then returning it to LR.


Elie / אלי

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Dan ­ Marchant
Do people actually believe in the Title Fairy?
Avatar
5,634 posts
Gallery: 19 photos
Likes: 2056
Joined Oct 2011
Location: Where I'm from is unimportant, it's where I'm going that counts.
     
Sep 10, 2013 02:17 |  #7

Pagman wrote in post #16283082 (external link)
.....I have noticed a file converted to tiff in DPP cant be opened in LR as It doesnt find it and says its missing,

LR won't automatically know anything about work done/files created in DPP. However, after you have saved a TIFF file, you can go to the Folders window in Library view, right click on the folder and select Synchronize Folder. It will then search the folder for new files and they will appear.


Dan Marchant
Website/blog: danmarchant.com (external link)
Instagram: @dan_marchant (external link)
Gear Canon 5DIII + Fuji X-T2 + lenses + a plastic widget I found in the camera box.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sancho1983
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,214 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 289
Joined Jan 2009
     
Sep 10, 2013 02:29 |  #8

Dan Marchant wrote in post #16282967 (external link)
Sorry to laugh but I have a vision of you hunched over a steam powered computer with spinning wheels, levers, ramps and other bizarre attachments. I am pretty sure Heath Robinson could devise a workflow which would be less needlessly complex.

I would....
1. Stop using Bridge & Lightroom. LR can do everything you need.

2. Stop creating three folders and moving images from folder to folder when just one folder will suffice.

Watch at least the first four of these videos on how to import and organise images in LR http://tv.adobe.com …be-photoshop-lightroom-5/ (external link)


They are RAW development software, similar to Lightroom. ACR has the same RAW development features that Lightroom has and ships as part of Photoshop. DPP is Canon's RAW development software. They each have their own unique features but all have basically similar functionality.

Thanks. Only two folders though; whatever the trip/event/day was and then "edited" within it. Although I'm not sure why I keep the unedited versions of the edited ones :)

I'll watch those videos and ignore dpp and acr.


Instagram (external link)
Https://bgsweddings.co​.uk (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Dan ­ Marchant
Do people actually believe in the Title Fairy?
Avatar
5,634 posts
Gallery: 19 photos
Likes: 2056
Joined Oct 2011
Location: Where I'm from is unimportant, it's where I'm going that counts.
     
Sep 10, 2013 09:17 as a reply to  @ sancho1983's post |  #9

I wouldn't ignore DPP and ACR. Just be aware they do essentially the same job. DPP comes free with a Canon camera and has the ability to show exactly where the selected focus point on a photo was - can be useful in diagnosing focus issues. As for ACR is is basically the same RAW developer as Lightroom and some people prefer the interface.


Dan Marchant
Website/blog: danmarchant.com (external link)
Instagram: @dan_marchant (external link)
Gear Canon 5DIII + Fuji X-T2 + lenses + a plastic widget I found in the camera box.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sancho1983
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,214 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 289
Joined Jan 2009
     
Sep 10, 2013 11:08 |  #10

Why have I not seen these videos before?!?!? Just watching the first one and have learnt about 5 things...

I'm going to play around with adding a bit of sharpening and contrast curve on import. I suppose every picture is different, but it will be a good starting place though.


Instagram (external link)
Https://bgsweddings.co​.uk (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 569
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
Sep 10, 2013 12:31 |  #11

sancho1983 wrote in post #16284023 (external link)
Thanks. Only two folders though; whatever the trip/event/day was and then "edited" within it. Although I'm not sure why I keep the unedited versions of the edited ones :)

I'll watch those videos and ignore dpp and acr.

Yeah keep watching those videos.

Something you are not "getting":

When you shoot Raw the Raw is kept as the "undeveloped" file, the "original". When Lightroom "works on" a Raw file it keeps the development settings in "metadata", either in the working catalog or if you tell it to in a separate "sidecar" file.

You won't have (or need) an "edited" file copy until you need one to "work with", either for output to share, for print, or for editing in an external editor (Lightroom has a function to "automate" editing in Photoshop or an external editor and creates a non-Raw copy to do that).

So, the Raw "workflow" differs from other file types in that it preserves the original and keeps the editing info separately. Lightroom has a very "nifty" way of preserving "Virtual Copies" of edits done, you can have several "versions" of the image in your library but only one "source file"!


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sancho1983
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,214 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 289
Joined Jan 2009
     
Sep 10, 2013 12:36 |  #12

I keep all of my pictures on a server. So I've got in the habit of putting them on my desktop, put into lightroom to edit, put back onto desktop and then I manually drag it into my pictures folder with my server.

Those videos are a revelation though, just things like pressing tab in the library module to hide the side panels. And the compare options. I literally just use loupe view and press x to reject. Not sure I'll use all of the other features yet but at least I know that they are there!


Instagram (external link)
Https://bgsweddings.co​.uk (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Dan ­ Marchant
Do people actually believe in the Title Fairy?
Avatar
5,634 posts
Gallery: 19 photos
Likes: 2056
Joined Oct 2011
Location: Where I'm from is unimportant, it's where I'm going that counts.
     
Sep 10, 2013 15:44 |  #13

sancho1983 wrote in post #16285150 (external link)
So I've got in the habit of putting them on my desktop, put into lightroom to edit, put back onto desktop and then I manually drag it into my pictures folder with my server.

This would be the needlessly complex bit of your workflow. There is no need to move the files into LR or back t the desktop afterwards.

If you want them on the desktop open Lightroom and use the Import dialogue to copy the files from you SD/CF card onto the desktop - It will make a new folder for them on the desktop as part of the process. Then you just edit them without having to move them (or copy them back to the desktop afterwards). When finished you can then move that folder to your server.


Dan Marchant
Website/blog: danmarchant.com (external link)
Instagram: @dan_marchant (external link)
Gear Canon 5DIII + Fuji X-T2 + lenses + a plastic widget I found in the camera box.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
LV ­ Moose
Moose gets blamed for everything.
Avatar
23,434 posts
Gallery: 223 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 4798
Joined Dec 2008
     
Sep 10, 2013 15:50 as a reply to  @ Dan Marchant's post |  #14

A lot of good info on here thus far. Thanks, guys. :)


Moose

Gear... Flickr (external link)...Flickr 2 (external link)...
Macro (external link)...Hummingbirds (external link)
Aircraft (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sancho1983
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,214 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 289
Joined Jan 2009
     
Sep 10, 2013 17:20 |  #15

Dan Marchant wrote in post #16285772 (external link)
This would be the needlessly complex bit of your workflow. There is no need to move the files into LR or back t the desktop afterwards.

If you want them on the desktop open Lightroom and use the Import dialogue to copy the files from you SD/CF card onto the desktop - It will make a new folder for them on the desktop as part of the process. Then you just edit them without having to move them (or copy them back to the desktop afterwards). When finished you can then move that folder to your server.

Thanks. Planning on taking some shots tomorrow so can put it into practice. If I want them as jpegs then I export them right?


Instagram (external link)
Https://bgsweddings.co​.uk (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

5,673 views & 0 likes for this thread, 8 members have posted to it.
DPP? ACR? Lightroom?
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Niagara Wedding Photographer
1100 guests, 164 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.