Here is my current RAW workflow:
http://www.sns.ias.edu …/23/digital-raw-workflow/![]()
Any comments/suggestions welcome.
Thanks.
JamesStephens Hatchling 7 posts Joined Jan 2006 More info | Jan 27, 2006 21:26 | #1 Here is my current RAW workflow: James Stephens
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jfrancho Cream of the Crop 6,341 posts Joined Feb 2005 More info | Jan 27, 2006 21:49 | #2 Error 404 - Not Found
LOG IN TO REPLY |
jfrancho Cream of the Crop 6,341 posts Joined Feb 2005 More info | Jan 27, 2006 22:07 | #4 My initial thoughts are that there are slight disconnects in the process due to including divergent workflows. For example, you crop in raw, and then crop again after conversion. There are no indications to what bit depth or color space you use in the conversion. You say adjust WB before exposure, but not why. If it's just a work flow, spare the reader of the opinions, unless you can back it up with evidence. BTW - I do that step the same way, and sometimes recheck for clipped pixels. Your note to turn off sharpening in ACR appears several steps after the conversion. There are other things in there that are a matter of opinion, like when to run noise reduction and capture sharpening. I don't do any NR beyond what is done during raw conversion. I'd say capture sharpening should happen immediately after conversion, before any other editing. The big issue I see is that the workflow seems incomplete: it stops with no indication of the output, what steps need to be taken to maximise quality for that output, such as resampling and sharpening for printing or web output, color space conversions, etc. It's a good start. It's hard work to document a process. It just needs some further work for it to be an effective tool for others.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tim Light Bringer 51,010 posts Likes: 375 Joined Nov 2004 Location: Wellington, New Zealand More info | Jan 28, 2006 01:27 | #5 You should read this book Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tim Light Bringer 51,010 posts Likes: 375 Joined Nov 2004 Location: Wellington, New Zealand More info | Jan 28, 2006 01:46 | #6 Yours looks like a very heavy, slow workflow. No need to hit control, 1-5 works. Adjust everything you can in RAW. Your workflow will work well, but you probably don't need to do quite so much unless you're making large prints out of all of them. At 6x4 or even bigger you probably won't notice the difference between a quick workflow and your huge one. Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Thankyou everyone for your useful input. I really appreciate you spending the time to provide such useful advice. James Stephens
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2070 guests, 100 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||