Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Transportation 
Thread started 10 Sep 2013 (Tuesday) 21:26
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Suggestions for Improving an Airliner Photo

 
mike_kukavica
Mostly Lurking
Avatar
16 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Sep 2013
Location: Newnan, GA
     
Sep 10, 2013 21:26 |  #1

Hello all,

This is my first time posting here; till now I've been in awe of the skill shown on this forum! As I'm still learning a lot, I was hoping maybe to benefit from your collective expertise.

My question revolves around how to get a more sharp photo of an airliner than what you see below. Do you see anything in the photo and the settings I used that jump out as a mistake?

Here's the particulars of this photo: Canon 6D with 200mm f/2.8L II + Extender EF 2x III (I realize that extenders aren't great, but with a good quality lens, the degradation should be less damaging than it might be to a cheap lens) This is my greatest reach.

Settings: Manual exposure, 1/800, f/5.6 (the lens combo won't do AF smaller than that) and ISO 200

I suppose the logical thing to do would be to move to 1/1000 + ISO 320 or 400, however I did try a few shots at that combo and they were even less less sharp. So I'm a little confused.

IMAGE: http://farm4.staticflickr.com/3750/9711408125_2f8eff928e_b.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com …/mikekukavica/9​711408125/  (external link)
Air Travel 2013-09-09 at 10-20-58 (external link) by mike.kukavica (external link), on Flickr

The reason I bring this up now is that I'm hoping to get a nice, sharp shot of Korean Airlines' A380 when it lifts off Friday. OK, this isn't bad, but even at a 50% crop it is obviously not as sharp as it could be.

Thanks in advance for your advice!

Mike



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cicopo
Goldmember
Avatar
3,702 posts
Gallery: 248 photos
Likes: 1389
Joined Mar 2007
Location: Ottawa, Ont, Canada
     
Sep 10, 2013 21:41 |  #2

Higher shutter speed, since you don't need prop blur nor background blur. Raise the ISO as needed to use something in the 1/1000 area or faster. The higher the shutter speed the better for SHARP but how high before noise creeps in depends on the body used.


A skill is developed through constant practice with a passion to improve, not bought.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PhotosGuy
Cream of the Crop, R.I.P.
Avatar
75,941 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 2611
Joined Feb 2004
Location: Middle of Michigan
     
Sep 10, 2013 22:04 |  #3

Did you shoot RAW? Sharpen that image at all? Every image needs some sharpening & RAW gives you a bigger file size to work with.

I suggest that first you run a tripod test to see what aperture gives you the best sharpness with the 2X. Then you can adjust the other settings to take advantage of that.

And...
HOSTED PHOTO DISPLAY FAILED: ATTACH id 662020 does not exist. ]


FrankC - 20D, RAW, Manual everything...
Classic Carz, Racing, Air Show, Flowers.
Find the light... A few Car Lighting Tips, and MOVE YOUR FEET!
Have you thought about making your own book? // Need an exposure crutch?
New Image Size Limits: Image must not exceed 1600 pixels on any side.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
joeseph
"smells like turd"
Avatar
11,839 posts
Gallery: 263 photos
Likes: 6004
Joined Jan 2004
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
     
Sep 11, 2013 04:12 |  #4

only other thing I'd mention is using AI Servo focus to track the plane...


some fairly old canon camera stuff, canon lenses, Manfrotto "thingy", and an M5, also an M6 that has had a 720nm filter bolted onto the sensor:
TF posting: here :-)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mike_kukavica
THREAD ­ STARTER
Mostly Lurking
Avatar
16 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Sep 2013
Location: Newnan, GA
     
Sep 15, 2013 08:27 |  #5

Hi Guys! Thanks for the suggestions!

cicopo wrote in post #16286629 (external link)
Higher shutter speed, since you don't need prop blur nor background blur. Raise the ISO as needed to use something in the 1/1000 area or faster. The higher the shutter speed the better for SHARP but how high before noise creeps in depends on the body used.

cicopo: I'm planning on raising the shutter speed as you suggested. Since I'm still on a steep uphill learning curve, I'm thinking of starting off in ISO auto, to get an idea what the camera thinks is right - and then I can experiment from there. At least in terms of ISO, the auto setting seems to default to a higher than needed value.

PhotosGuy wrote in post #16286680 (external link)
Did you shoot RAW? Sharpen that image at all? Every image needs some sharpening & RAW gives you a bigger file size to work with.

I suggest that first you run a tripod test to see what aperture gives you the best sharpness with the 2X. Then you can adjust the other settings to take advantage of that.

PhotosGuy: I just realized I should have added post processing to the photo info - doh! Yes, the photo was shot in RAW, and edited in DPP. I left the sharpening / Unsharp mask at the default settings, maybe I should have bumped it up a bit. Sometimes I'll use the lens profile for sharpness, however in this case there isn't one for either the lens nor lens + extender.

I hadn't considered doing a test to see the ultimate sharpness, however that's a good idea!

joeseph wrote in post #16287188 (external link)
only other thing I'd mention is using AI Servo focus to track the plane...

joeseph: Yes, AI Servo is my friend! I've usually used the center point, but have been wondering if I should change it to all the points. The 6D manual says that if you have all the points on, the camera starts with the center point and then adds others, so maybe it's the same after all.

Last Friday, I managed to get to a decent view of the runway when the 340 was scheduled to take off, but in the rush I forgot to check the flight status...needless to say I wasted my time because it was delayed and my window passed. Oh well, I won't give up!

Tomorrow will be a good chance to practice, as the same Korean Air 777 is taking off within 10 minutes of a Delta 747, and I intend on being there!

Thanks again for the advice.

Mike




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Hammy74
Goldmember
1,082 posts
Gallery: 271 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 12550
Joined Feb 2012
Location: Brantford ON
     
Sep 16, 2013 08:34 |  #6

I use 1/1000 shutter speed and single point, AI servo for airliners.
I find it helps if you aim the focus point at areas of higher contrast on the plane.
For this plane, I would try to keep the focus point on the Korean Air lettering or along the windows where the light blue goes to grey.
Steve


Steve

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jwol
Senior Member
Avatar
813 posts
Likes: 993
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Centreville,VA
     
Sep 16, 2013 16:36 as a reply to  @ Hammy74's post |  #7

I honestly think that shooting at f/8-f/11 would improve IQ considerably with that lens combination. PhotosGuy is correct, you should find out what aperture gives you the best sharpness with that combo.

Yes, you could raise your ISO for more shutter speed, just keep in mind the noise factor. This is where practicing slow shutter speed panning pays off. You might also try high speed burst. You should get at least one really sharp shot out of the series.

Also keeping the focus point on the lettering isn't a bad idea but I would attempt to hold the center focus point on a very specific spot, say, within the upper loop of the R in Korean. Of course the most important ingredient, practice.


John Lackey
Fly By Photography (external link)
Blog (external link)

Radial engines don't actually leak oil, by the way. They just mark their territory!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mike_kukavica
THREAD ­ STARTER
Mostly Lurking
Avatar
16 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Sep 2013
Location: Newnan, GA
     
Sep 16, 2013 20:42 |  #8

jwol wrote in post #16301680 (external link)
I honestly think that shooting at f/8-f/11 would improve IQ considerably with that lens combination. PhotosGuy is correct, you should find out what aperture gives you the best sharpness with that combo.

Yes, you could raise your ISO for more shutter speed, just keep in mind the noise factor. This is where practicing slow shutter speed panning pays off. You might also try high speed burst. You should get at least one really sharp shot out of the series.

Also keeping the focus point on the lettering isn't a bad idea but I would attempt to hold the center focus point on a very specific spot, say, within the upper loop of the R in Korean. Of course the most important ingredient, practice.

jwol: I agree with what you are saying about the aperture setting; however the camera is not capable of AF at anything less than f/5.6. So I've been trying to deal with that; next time I will try your suggestion - most importantly practice! This is the most important ingredient, for sure. And I have a lot of practice in my future!

Also, I have used burst shooting, although I need to use my fastest card. Stupidly, I had the less than fastest card in the camera, and while shooting this 747 ran into the card's write limitation.

In any case, based on the feedback up till yesterday ( 1/1000, f/5.6, ISO 400), this is the result:

IMAGE: http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7297/9779644531_30e45b33d5_b.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com …/mikekukavica/9​779644531/  (external link)
Air Travel 2013-09-16 at 13-44-34 (external link) by mike.kukavica (external link), on Flickr

It's a little bit sharper than the first example; not a whole lot though. I did use slightly more sharpening in DPP, although that can't account for the difference alone. Actually, I wish I had known this beast was taking off, as I would have removed the Extender!

Thanks again for the advice! It seems as if my next chance will be next Monday afternoon at LAX; I'll be able to squeeze in an hour or so shooting. The baseline I'll work from is 1/1000, f/7.1 - f/8, ISO 200.

One last thing, these shots are from the Cell Phone lot at ATL. This is an awesome place to see the north runway if the planes are taking off to the West. No hassle, and good view.

Best regards,

Mike



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cicopo
Goldmember
Avatar
3,702 posts
Gallery: 248 photos
Likes: 1389
Joined Mar 2007
Location: Ottawa, Ont, Canada
     
Sep 16, 2013 21:18 |  #9

Unless there's been a big change in the camera's OS you can set it for F8 or F11 without affecting the AF. It still uses the wide open setting to AF but closes down when taking the shot. There are lenses which use f6.3 as the widest opening but they tell the camera it's f5.6 so the AF will work even though the manual says it won't; much like people try by taping pins on TC's to trick the camera.


A skill is developed through constant practice with a passion to improve, not bought.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mike_kukavica
THREAD ­ STARTER
Mostly Lurking
Avatar
16 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Sep 2013
Location: Newnan, GA
     
Sep 17, 2013 07:32 |  #10

It hit me last night how dumb I am - the camer will autofocus the lens even with the extender, at any aperture setting. However, if the maximum aperture is smaller than f/5.6 the camera (6D) won't autofocus at all.

Embarrassing, that...




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jwol
Senior Member
Avatar
813 posts
Likes: 993
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Centreville,VA
     
Sep 17, 2013 15:07 as a reply to  @ mike_kukavica's post |  #11

Mike, the last photo is looking better. Try stopping the lens down to f/8 or so. You'll be giving up shutter speed unless you up ISO. Higher ISO or slower shutter, your call.

Something else that will also help you is shooting with the sun at your back. Is there an area you can access that will get you on the south side of the runway, especially later in the day? You might try an internet search for a spotters group in your area. They'll know what areas you can access around the airport that will give you good photos of the aircraft, without being arrested.


John Lackey
Fly By Photography (external link)
Blog (external link)

Radial engines don't actually leak oil, by the way. They just mark their territory!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mike_kukavica
THREAD ­ STARTER
Mostly Lurking
Avatar
16 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Sep 2013
Location: Newnan, GA
     
Sep 22, 2013 11:27 |  #12

jwol wrote in post #16304433 (external link)
Mike, the last photo is looking better. Try stopping the lens down to f/8 or so. You'll be giving up shutter speed unless you up ISO. Higher ISO or slower shutter, your call.

Something else that will also help you is shooting with the sun at your back. Is there an area you can access that will get you on the south side of the runway, especially later in the day? You might try an internet search for a spotters group in your area. They'll know what areas you can access around the airport that will give you good photos of the aircraft, without being arrested.

John, first of all, I looked at your website and all I can say is WOW! And thank you for the advice.

As it turns out, I'll be in LA for a short time this upcoming week and this is my next chance to practice some more. According to Korean Air's schedule, the 380 takes off at 1 PM, so I'll be trying to spy that thing. That's not a great time for lighting though. I'm also going to try to get to the Proud Bird in the evening and catch some landing into the sunset.

So the new baseline is going to be 1/1000, f/8 and ISO 400. That should be a good place to start from, and see where it goes.

Thanks again!

Mike




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mike_kukavica
THREAD ­ STARTER
Mostly Lurking
Avatar
16 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Sep 2013
Location: Newnan, GA
     
Oct 09, 2013 19:49 |  #13

Hello Friends,

Two Mondays ago, I had another go from the 'recycling center' near the airport and came away with this:

IMAGE: http://farm4.staticflickr.com/3818/10102791716_5d356839df_b.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com …mikekukavica/10​102791716/  (external link)
Commercial Aviation 2013-09-30 at 13-11-48 (external link) by mike.kukavica (external link), on Flickr

The lighting wasn't great; it was cloudy with some spots of sun. Anyway, this one is better than the first, but still not as sharp as I would like.

This last Monday, I saw that the planes were taking off to the West, which means going to the Cell Phone lot. At this vantage point, you're really close but basically underneath the planes. So I dumped the extender and also got the idea to switch the polarizing filter for a uv filter to see if that would help with keeping the shutter speed around 1/1250. This is a tradeoff, but I thought it was worth a try.

The only bad part was that there was pretty solid cloud cover on one side and only a little on the other, however these came out pretty sharp:

IMAGE: http://farm3.staticflickr.com/2875/10146385403_1b022c842e_b.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com …mikekukavica/10​146385403/  (external link)
Commercial Aviation 2013-10-07 at 13-28-32 (external link) by mike.kukavica (external link), on Flickr

Having to shoot at the middle of the day (to get this particular plane) and the cloud cover means a pretty bright picture, again the target was to practice getting a sharp shot.

While I was there, a China Air Lines cargo plane took off, which was an unexpected treat and this also was the result:

IMAGE: http://farm4.staticflickr.com/3673/10146256835_6770b6b5a8_b.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com …mikekukavica/10​146256835/  (external link)
Commercial Aviation 2013-10-07 at 13-22-23 (external link) by mike.kukavica (external link), on Flickr

I'm starting to think that the difference in sharpness is the 2X teleconverter. I've gotten really sharp photos with it and the 200mm 2.8 L combination; however Canon says that the autofocus speed is around 50% slower with the converter. So what I tend to think is that the autofocus isn't quite keeping up with the moving plane.

Either way, the Great Georgia Airshow is this weekend and I'll have the chance to try a smaller target, and I'm going to try with and without the teleconverter to see what happens. Maybe having slower flying warbirds might make a difference.

Best regards,

Mike



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cicopo
Goldmember
Avatar
3,702 posts
Gallery: 248 photos
Likes: 1389
Joined Mar 2007
Location: Ottawa, Ont, Canada
     
Oct 09, 2013 20:17 |  #14

If I'm reading this right you say you've been using a polarizer on the earlier shots but not the last 2. Could be it's softening them too. What brand is it & have you tried testing with vs without on a similar pair of photos.


A skill is developed through constant practice with a passion to improve, not bought.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mike_kukavica
THREAD ­ STARTER
Mostly Lurking
Avatar
16 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Sep 2013
Location: Newnan, GA
     
Oct 09, 2013 20:20 as a reply to  @ cicopo's post |  #15

cicopo, I'm using B+W filters, both with the MRC coating. Since they have a good reputation for quality, I'm hoping they aren't causing a lack of sharpness.

I do need to make a back to back evaluation with and without though.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,331 views & 0 likes for this thread, 6 members have posted to it.
Suggestions for Improving an Airliner Photo
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Transportation 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is ANebinger
1149 guests, 169 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.