This morning's sunrise at Doheny Beach -- Nature & Landscapes in photography-on-the.net forums

incendy

Goldmember

2,118 posts
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Orange County

More info

Jan 28, 2006 09:52 | #1

HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO

Canon 5d with 35mm 1.4L, 24-70mm 2.8L and 135mm 2.0L

My site: http://www.flickr.com/photos/incendy

LIKES 0

saravrose

"I quit smoking dope"

9,562 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Between here and there

More info

Jan 28, 2006 10:24 | #2

just pretty, and the water is fantastic.... Sari.

Canon 30D BG_E2 Grip Rebel XT BG-E3 battery grip
Canon 50mm f1.8 Tamron 17-50 f2.8
Canon 70-200f4.0L 100-400L aka (Chuck)
a couple of bags and a lot of big ideas
"The shot is in my head before it's in front of my camera...."

LIKES 0

kuchen

Mostly Lurking

14 posts
Joined Jan 2006

More info

Jan 28, 2006 10:35 | #3

The blur of water is really nice

Canon G5, original Canon wide-lens 24 mm, Cokin filters (polarizer, tobacco, gradient), Velbon Sherpa 750n

LIKES 0

incendy
THREAD STARTER

Goldmember

2,118 posts
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Orange County

More info

Jan 28, 2006 10:37 as a reply to @ saravrose's post | #4

saravrose wrote:
just pretty, and the water is fantastic.... Sari.

Thanks saravrose! I was actually heading to the harbor to take pictures when I saw the color of the water from the freeway and made a quick detour! I am glad I did.. I got a couple others I really like I will post in here once I get them uploaded too

Canon 5d with 35mm 1.4L, 24-70mm 2.8L and 135mm 2.0L

My site: http://www.flickr.com/photos/incendy

LIKES 0

Dimitri_V

Cream of the Crop

9,221 posts
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Scotland

More info

Jan 28, 2006 11:22 | #5

Permanent ban

Allthough quite a bit overexpossed , still a very nice one.

My site http://www.earthsbeautytours.com

LIKES 0

incendy
THREAD STARTER

Goldmember

2,118 posts
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Orange County

More info

Jan 28, 2006 11:41 as a reply to @ Dimitri_V's post | #6

dv2004 wrote:
Allthough quite a bit overexpossed , still a very nice one.

yep it is pretty overexposed.. I was trying to pull as much detail as possible but the more I look at it, it does take away. This version is exposed better, but seems a bit dark to me. Is it better or worse do you think?

HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO

Canon 5d with 35mm 1.4L, 24-70mm 2.8L and 135mm 2.0L

My site: http://www.flickr.com/photos/incendy

LIKES 0

Jump to forum... • Rules • Forums • New posts • RTAT • 'Best of' • Gallery • Gear • Reviews • Member list • Polls • Image rules • Search • Password reset • Home

Not a member yet?

Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.

THEME: Paper White | Darker
MARGINS: (this page: defaults)

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
1766 guests, 105 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.

	x 1600
	y 1600