Hello All,
I can't really pick which one I like better. I am interested in other opinions:
or...
Original Size: http://static.flickr.com/17/92177571_8187c4193e_o.jpg
jhzafrani Member 126 posts Joined Dec 2005 Location: Woodland Hills, Ca More info | Jan 28, 2006 10:44 | #1 Hello All, or... Original Size: http://static.flickr.com/17/92177571_8187c4193e_o.jpg -----------
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Rjohn518 Member 134 posts Joined Sep 2003 Location: Illinois More info | Jan 28, 2006 11:04 | #2 I like them both--beautiful colors! If I had to choose, I would choose the first one, because the colorful areas contrast nicely with the darker areas. Gives a mysterious, impending dark feel. Nice job. Canon 10D, 30D; Canon 17-40mm f4L, Canon 24-70mm f2.8L, Canon 70-200mm f2.8 L IS, Canon 100-400mm f4.5-5.6 L IS, Sigma 105mm macro, Canon MR14 EX ring flash, FlashTrax 40GB external HDD
LOG IN TO REPLY |
stupot Goldmember 2,227 posts Joined Dec 2005 Location: UK, Portsmouth Uni / HW Bucks More info | Jan 28, 2006 11:14 | #3 i like them both too. cant choose! Canon EOS 350D, Sigma 10-20 f4-5.6, 24-105 f4L IS, 70-200 f4L, 300 f4L IS, Kenko 1.4x pro300, 430EX, Apple Powerbook G4
LOG IN TO REPLY |
rudgej Couch-potato photographer 5,613 posts Joined Jul 2005 More info | Jan 28, 2006 11:35 | #4 I would choose the second one because the focus is primarily the sunset, but yet has a bit of foreground interest with the tree. In contrast, the first one has a larger silhouetted area of land and is darker which, to me, detracts from the sunset.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ajbalazic Cream of the Crop 5,228 posts Joined Jan 2005 Location: Kitchener, ON, Canada More info | Jan 28, 2006 12:10 | #5 The second shot is the better one for the reasons that John mentions. Although, the first would have been better if it was framed differently- less dark forground and the complete tree on the right side would have made for a superb shot. Alan
LOG IN TO REPLY |
montreal Goldmember 1,194 posts Joined Apr 2005 Location: Trondheim, Norway More info | ajbalazic wrote: The second shot is the better one for the reasons that John mentions. I disagree. In the second shot, the trees are coming out of nowhere. That's why I like the first better. You might want to crop it slightly though. 5D - 17-40L, 70-200L f4, 50 f1.4, PowerShot A430
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such! 2282 guests, 131 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||