I apologize for bringing something up from almost a week ago, but I just returned from a trip, got online for the first time in a week, and this is the first post I saw:
gjl711 wrote in post #17715809
Wildlife and stuff pictures are fun for the photographer but of no value to others I think. They are pretty and all, but my dad had hundreds of these type of images and no one is interested in them now.
JJ, I am a bit surprised by your opinion concerning wildlife photos. When I go to a news stand, I see lots of magazines that have a lot of wildlife photos in them. I also sell photos of wildlife - it is a big chunk of my livelihood.
If people weren't interested in wildlife photos, then how is it that I am able to sell so many of them? And why is it that so many magazines, calendars, books, etc, have wildlife photos printed on them?
It's kind of ironic that I was on a week-long photo trip, photographing wildlife, just got home, like, literally, 10 minutes ago, log into POTN, and this post of yours was the first thing I see - a post saying that wildlife photos "have no value to others", and that "no one is interested in them"!
"Your" and "you're" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one.
"They're", "their", and "there" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one.
"Fare" and "fair" are different words with completely different meanings - please use the correct one. The proper expression is "moot point", NOT "mute point".