Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
Thread started 22 Sep 2013 (Sunday) 00:11
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Can airline travel damage camera electronics?

 
NBEast
Goldmember
Avatar
1,699 posts
Gallery: 11 photos
Likes: 67
Joined Aug 2005
Location: So Cal
     
Sep 22, 2013 00:11 |  #1

I took my 7D to Maui. Suddenly; AF Mode doesn't work properly. I can't select AF point. Also; my battery failed. Long story; but I didn't use it there - it sat in the hotel room all week.

I've tried resetting all settings; all different modes. Still no luck.

Otherwise the camera works well; I just can't select my AF point. Since I always shoot that way; it's debilitating. Especially for Sports.

I did put it in my check-in luggage on the way there. I'm wondering if I should have kept it in the pressurized cabin. If so; what an embarrassing (and expensive) lesson!

Anyone know if air travel can cause this? Could TSA inspections have something to do with it?


Gear List / Photos (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
justinz850
Senior Member
330 posts
Likes: 6
Joined Apr 2011
Location: Florida Panhandle
     
Sep 22, 2013 00:18 |  #2

I would be more worried with the way the checked luggage is handled over it being in a non pressurized hole because the airlines are brutal on bags. So yea, there is a very good possibility of it being damaged during your travels. I never have any issues with gear and I travel quite often, but I also never put any gear in checked luggage.


Canon 5D3
Leica M
Rolleiflex 3.5f

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
x_tan
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,153 posts
Gallery: 137 photos
Best ofs: 3
Likes: 511
Joined Sep 2010
Location: ɐılɐɹʇsnɐ 'ǝuɹnoqlǝɯ
     
Sep 22, 2013 00:25 |  #3

NBEast wrote in post #16315303 (external link)
...
Could TSA inspections have something to do with it?

Yes! Very possible & some spying device might insert into the camera during the inspection.

Big brother is watching :-(


Canon 5D3 + Zoom (EF 17-40L, 24-105L & 28-300L, 100-400L II) & Prime (24L II, 85L II, 100L, 135L & 200 f/2.8L II; Zeiss 1,4/35)
Sony α7r + Zeiss 1,8/55 FE
Nikon Coolpix A; Nikon F3 & F100 + Zeiss 1,4/50
Retiring  (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rick_reno
Cream of the Crop
44,648 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 155
Joined Dec 2010
     
Sep 22, 2013 01:25 |  #4

No, TSA inspections can result in your camera being stolen, but they don't break them. I suppose its possible one of their employees took it out of the bag to try it out before stealing it, somehow broke and decided to wait for one that works but I doubt it.
Did your bag have one of those short letters inside it explaining TSA opened it for inspection? I fly quite a bit and get a lot of them, for some reason they enjoy rumaging thru my stuff.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
NBEast
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,699 posts
Gallery: 11 photos
Likes: 67
Joined Aug 2005
Location: So Cal
     
Sep 22, 2013 01:49 |  #5

Wasn't worried about theft - excuse for modern replacement. It was well packed in durable luggage.

Its either a strange coincidence or the X-Rays, extreme cold, or depressurization caused it.

The battery was dead upon arrival. I'm thinking the extreme cold caused some chemical short. I should have removed the battery from the camera. Either that or the X-Rays (or other rays they use now like maybe ultra-sound) can damage electronics.

Just looking for some kind of definitive confirmation about proper packing procedure.


Gear List / Photos (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Dan ­ Marchant
Do people actually believe in the Title Fairy?
Avatar
5,634 posts
Gallery: 19 photos
Likes: 2056
Joined Oct 2011
Location: Where I'm from is unimportant, it's where I'm going that counts.
     
Sep 22, 2013 06:51 as a reply to  @ NBEast's post |  #6

The xrays are not in any way going to damage your camera. Millions of cameras go through airport x-ray machines every day.

If it was the flight then it was the rough handling by baggage handlers or possibly the cold. Or it might just have been that the battery was going to fail and you just happened to go travelling at the same time.

How old is the battery? Do you use the camera regularly? If you don't use it for extended periods do you remove the battery or make sure it is fully charged before leaving it?


Dan Marchant
Website/blog: danmarchant.com (external link)
Instagram: @dan_marchant (external link)
Gear Canon 5DIII + Fuji X-T2 + lenses + a plastic widget I found in the camera box.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DocFrankenstein
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
12,324 posts
Likes: 13
Joined Apr 2004
Location: where the buffalo roam
     
Sep 22, 2013 14:24 |  #7

Are you sure luggage is depressurised? Just from design standpoint it costs less money to seal a cylinder including baggage rather than passengers alone.

At high altitudes I've heard there's some cosmic radiation that may damage microprocessors...


National Sarcasm Society. Like we need your support.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rent
Senior Member
651 posts
Likes: 39
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Irvine, CA
     
Sep 22, 2013 15:46 as a reply to  @ DocFrankenstein's post |  #8

Typical commercial flights from SoCal to HI would have a pressurized cargo area (not at sea-level, but generally at less than 10,000 feet level). Damage from pressure changes is unlikely.

Best guess would be due to rough handling.

Always carry on your gears.

-alex


http://portfolio.alexj​iang.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kf095
Out buying Wheaties
Avatar
7,474 posts
Gallery: 63 photos
Likes: 1078
Joined Dec 2009
Location: Canada, Ontario, Milton
     
Sep 22, 2013 20:23 |  #9

NBEast wrote in post #16315303 (external link)
...
I did put it in my check-in luggage on the way there...

You just answered your own question.


M-E and ME blog (external link). Flickr (external link). my DigitaL and AnaLog Gear.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
hollis_f
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
10,649 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 85
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Sussex, UK
     
Sep 23, 2013 03:53 |  #10

rick_reno wrote in post #16315412 (external link)
No, TSA inspections can result in your camera being stolen, but they don't break them.

Correct TSA inspections aren't likely to break your camera.

What is likely to break your camera is the way your luggage is treated by the baggage handlers. VIDEO (external link)


Frank Hollis - Retired mass spectroscopist
Give a man a fish and he'll eat for a day. Teach a man to fish and he'll complain about the withdrawal of his free fish entitlement.
Gear Website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DisrupTer911
Goldmember
Avatar
2,455 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 29
Joined Jul 2008
Location: TN, USA
     
Sep 23, 2013 10:23 |  #11

is it the same serial # camera? could one of the handlers swapped out a dead 7D for your working one? never know....


www.vividemotionphotograph​y.comexternal link

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DocFrankenstein
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
12,324 posts
Likes: 13
Joined Apr 2004
Location: where the buffalo roam
     
Sep 23, 2013 15:44 |  #12

DisrupTer911 wrote in post #16318416 (external link)
is it the same serial # camera? could one of the handlers swapped out a dead 7D for your working one? never know....

That's somewhat far fetched.


National Sarcasm Society. Like we need your support.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
philwillmedia
Cream of the Crop
5,253 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 25
Joined Nov 2008
Location: "...just south of the 23rd Paralell..."
     
Sep 23, 2013 17:09 as a reply to  @ DocFrankenstein's post |  #13

DisrupTer911 wrote in post #16318416 (external link)
is it the same serial # camera? could one of the handlers swapped out a dead 7D for your working one? never know....

Really...?
So you think that some baggage handler is going to be standing there with a dead 7D and randomly open a passenger's bag to find a working 7D and make the switch...
Yeah right...
Dream on champ.


Regards, Phil
2019 South Australian Country Press Assoc Sports Photo of the Year - Runner Up
2018 South Australian Country Press Assoc Sports Photo of the Year
2018 CAMS (now Motorsport Australia) Gold Accredited Photographer
Finallist - 2014 NT Media Awards
"A bad day at the race track is better than a good day in the office"

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JeffreyG
"my bits and pieces are all hard"
Avatar
15,540 posts
Gallery: 42 photos
Likes: 619
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Detroit, MI
     
Sep 23, 2013 17:44 |  #14

DocFrankenstein wrote in post #16316622 (external link)
Are you sure luggage is depressurised? Just from design standpoint it costs less money to seal a cylinder including baggage rather than passengers alone.

You are probably correct. One of the earliest DC-10 crashes (Paris, 1974) happened when a cargo door failed and caused instantaneous depressurization of the cargo hold. The pressure in the passenger area blew out the passenger deck (down into the cargo hold), which caused major structural damage to the tail section of the aircraft and ejected one row of passengers, seats and all.


My personal stuff:http://www.flickr.com/​photos/jngirbach/sets/ (external link)
I use a Canon 5DIII and a Sony A7rIII

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DocFrankenstein
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
12,324 posts
Likes: 13
Joined Apr 2004
Location: where the buffalo roam
     
Sep 23, 2013 17:52 |  #15

JeffreyG wrote in post #16319493 (external link)
You are probably correct. One of the earliest DC-10 crashes (Paris, 1974) happened when a cargo door failed and caused instantaneous depressurization of the cargo hold. The pressure in the passenger area blew out the passenger deck (down into the cargo hold), which caused major structural damage to the tail section of the aircraft and ejected one row of passengers, seats and all.

Such an interesting way to die. It's always fascinating how complex systems go down.


National Sarcasm Society. Like we need your support.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

10,979 views & 0 likes for this thread, 20 members have posted to it.
Can airline travel damage camera electronics?
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Marcsaa
763 guests, 119 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.