Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
Thread started 25 Sep 2013 (Wednesday) 14:03
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Yongnuo Macro Ring Flash - ist it any good?

 
Iskander
Hatchling
2 posts
Joined Mar 2014
     
Mar 20, 2014 06:59 |  #16

There are two modifications of the SIGMA 105 mm f/2.8 macro. One has 58 mm thread, the second one (the one I have) - 62 mm. Today I've got an answer from the YONGNUO. Here it is in case somebody else is interested:

We are sorry to tell you that YN-14EX doesn't support filter size 62mm, please purchase adapter ring for it.

Which means that I will need to get a step up ring 62->67 or 62->72 mm. Fortunately these rings are cheap as dirt.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
vengence
Goldmember
2,103 posts
Likes: 108
Joined Mar 2013
     
Mar 20, 2014 07:58 |  #17

Iskander wrote in post #16772271 (external link)
There are two modifications of the SIGMA 105 mm f/2.8 macro. One has 58 mm thread, the second one (the one I have) - 62 mm. Today I've got an answer from the YONGNUO. Here it is in case somebody else is interested:

We are sorry to tell you that YN-14EX doesn't support filter size 62mm, please purchase adapter ring for it.

Which means that I will need to get a step up ring 62->67 or 62->72 mm. Fortunately these rings are cheap as dirt.

Thanks for reporting back your findings. Report back how you like the flash too if you would!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Vetteography
Goldmember
Avatar
2,032 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Miami FL, USA
     
Mar 25, 2014 10:59 |  #18

I ordered one, should be here in a few days. Will report back with what I find.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Emington
Member
Avatar
225 posts
Joined Jan 2007
Location: England, UK
     
Apr 16, 2014 13:26 as a reply to  @ post 16835922 |  #19

I can't speak for everyone but for me it's to be used to photograph insects and flowers in the garden as to get a fast shutter to stop slight movement from the wind I need some sort of flash otherwise depth of field is so small when shooting 1:1 ratio.


  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cpcnick
Hatchling
4 posts
Joined Dec 2011
Location: Yorkshire, England
     
Jul 04, 2014 20:52 |  #20

if this thread is running still read on..... the yn 14ex is hmmmmmm good and BAD...the good if your shooting only to 1/250th sec speed buy it....if your shooting live subjects in the field DONT !...... many fly's etc move faster than a 1/250th sec shot !...... i know ive learn the hard way :) ....... im on a Canon 7D Canon 100 MM F 2.8 I.S. L series glass with 2x 31 MM and a 21 MM extension tube set up (all electrically connected) ....i get some good shots but only to 1/250th sec ...nor settings F 16 iso 200 1/250th sec .....

hope this helps..... the pic below needs a flash of over 1/250th sec as this shot is all you can get at a 1/250th .....this took 20 goes to obtain this poor image

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2014/07/1/LQ_689209.jpg
Image hosted by forum (689209) © cpcnick [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lt ­ Colonel
Senior Member
Avatar
885 posts
Gallery: 42 photos
Likes: 1495
Joined Dec 2013
Location: Zebulon, NC
     
Jul 04, 2014 20:58 as a reply to  @ cpcnick's post |  #21

Good info, thanks for sharing.


5DIII, 6D, 7D2, 5DMKIV,1DMK4,EOS-M,1DX
https://woodawg.smugmu​g.com/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
eeek
Hatchling
7 posts
Joined Jun 2007
     
Jul 05, 2014 19:13 |  #22

cpcnick wrote in post #17012052 (external link)
if this thread is running still read on..... the yn 14ex is hmmmmmm good and BAD...the good if your shooting only to 1/250th sec speed buy it....if your shooting live subjects in the field DONT !...... many fly's etc move faster than a 1/250th sec shot !...... i know ive learn the hard way :) ....... im on a Canon 7D Canon 100 MM F 2.8 I.S. L series glass with 2x 31 MM and a 21 MM extension tube set up (all electrically connected) ....i get some good shots but only to 1/250th sec ...nor settings F 16 iso 200 1/250th sec .....

hope this helps..... the pic below needs a flash of over 1/250th sec as this shot is all you can get at a 1/250th .....this took 20 goes to obtain this poor image

If you are shooting those flies in particular, you need to shoot in manual only. The ttl preflash will freak them out.

Also, here's some info on flash duration, number 1 in particular:

http://orionmystery.bl​ogspot.com …photography-3-things.html (external link)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cpcnick
Hatchling
4 posts
Joined Dec 2011
Location: Yorkshire, England
     
Jul 07, 2014 03:57 |  #23

eeek wrote in post #17013569 (external link)
If you are shooting those flies in particular, you need to shoot in manual only. The ttl preflash will freak them out.

Also, here's some info on flash duration, number 1 in particular:

http://orionmystery.bl​ogspot.com …photography-3-things.html (external link)

I always shoot manual m8 on ETTL, dont know anyone who's in this game shooting any other way to be honest..... so since there is no pre-flash subject is beating the flash out right :(




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ksbal
Goldmember
Avatar
2,745 posts
Gallery: 374 photos
Best ofs: 9
Likes: 2433
Joined Sep 2010
Location: N.E. Kansas
     
Jul 07, 2014 09:29 |  #24

eeek wrote in post #17013569 (external link)
If you are shooting those flies in particular, you need to shoot in manual only. The ttl preflash will freak them out.

I had never even considered flash an fly freak out. :lol:


Godox/Flashpoint r2 system, plus some canon stuff.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MalVeauX
"Looks rough and well used"
Avatar
14,250 posts
Gallery: 2135 photos
Best ofs: 4
Likes: 13370
Joined Feb 2013
Location: Florida
     
Jul 08, 2014 09:37 |  #25

cpcnick wrote in post #17012052 (external link)
if this thread is running still read on..... the yn 14ex is hmmmmmm good and BAD...the good if your shooting only to 1/250th sec speed buy it....if your shooting live subjects in the field DONT !...... many fly's etc move faster than a 1/250th sec shot !...... i know ive learn the hard way :) ....... im on a Canon 7D Canon 100 MM F 2.8 I.S. L series glass with 2x 31 MM and a 21 MM extension tube set up (all electrically connected) ....i get some good shots but only to 1/250th sec ...nor settings F 16 iso 200 1/250th sec .....

hope this helps..... the pic below needs a flash of over 1/250th sec as this shot is all you can get at a 1/250th .....this took 20 goes to obtain this poor image

Most of us dedicated macro folk shoot at 1/200s with flash and have zero issues nailing stunning fast moving flies or other bugs.

The above quoted advise is not good macro advise, at all. The errors and problems were the user and had nothing to do with the ring flash in question.

Very best


My Flickr (external link) :: My Astrobin (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JoseCanseco
Senior Member
Avatar
689 posts
Gallery: 11 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 151
Joined Dec 2012
Location: ON, Canada
     
Jul 08, 2014 10:56 |  #26

MalVeauX wrote in post #17018675 (external link)
Most of us dedicated macro folk shoot at 1/200s with flash and have zero issues nailing stunning fast moving flies or other bugs.

The above quoted advise is not good macro advise, at all. The errors and problems were the user and had nothing to do with the ring flash in question.

Very best

Agreed! Are you using this flash now? How are you liking it compared to your previous setup?


My name is Jeff, not actually Jose Canseco.
Website (external link) Facebook (external link) Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
eeek
Hatchling
7 posts
Joined Jun 2007
     
Jul 09, 2014 05:49 |  #27

cpcnick wrote in post #17015982 (external link)
I always shoot manual m8 on ETTL, dont know anyone who's in this game shooting any other way to be honest..... so since there is no pre-flash subject is beating the flash out right :(

I'm a little confused- are you saying you are shooting the camera on manual and the flash on ETTL? Because that sends out a preflash and that preflash will cause these long legged flies to take off.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Gungnir
Senior Member
Avatar
694 posts
Gallery: 37 photos
Likes: 256
Joined Sep 2005
Location: Suffolk, England
     
Jul 15, 2014 13:20 |  #28

Could one of you who have one please tell me if it is physically big enough to be used on a lens with 77mm filter size?

Regards


Steve
'Be the person your dog thinks you are'
#freetommy

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Whortleberry
Goldmember
Avatar
1,719 posts
Likes: 53
Joined Dec 2011
Location: Yorkshire, England
     
Jul 15, 2014 15:37 |  #29

  • The external diameter of the adapter rings supplied with the YN-14EX is just under 84mm.
  • The smallest part of the aperture for the lens to 'look through' (ie the throat) is 74mm.

Physically, the external diameter (1) suggests that it is theoretically possible to cobble something together to fit this on a 77mm filter thread lens.
The smallest diameter of the hole in the doughnut (2) shows that with anything larger than the largest (72mm thread) ring supplied, part of the mount will protrude across the front of a 77mm thread lens. Depending on the lens chosen, this may not protrude into the field of view - the emphasis being on "MAY not".

Purely to answer this question, I have just fitted my YN-14EX onto my Canon 24-70mm L (Mark 1 therefore 77mm thread) on a FF body. I did this with the YN-supplied 67mm ring plus a 67-77mm stepping ring. (Sorry, no 72-77mm stepping ring available.) Physically, it WILL fit without any string/sealing wax/duct tape/rubber band contrivances - simply screws together perfectly normally.

I don't have time to check photographically, but visually it appears that the combination starts to vignette at about 35mm F.L. and is very pronounced at 24mm F.L. The 70mm appears to be vignette-free and usable. I must stress though that these are VISUAL checks only (at f/22 of course) - and only apply to this particular combination of lens and adapters.

Phil ǁ Kershaw Soho Reflex: 4¼" Ross Xpres, 6½" Aldis, Super XX/ABC Pyro in 24 DDS, HP3/Meritol Metol in RFH, Johnson 'Scales' brand flash powder. Kodak Duo Six-20/Verichrome Pan. Other odd bits over the decades, simply to get the job done - not merely to polish and brag about cos I'm too mean to buy the polish!
FlickR (external link) ◄► "The Other Yongnuo User Guide v4.12" by Clive Bolton (external link) ◄► UK Railway Photographs 1906-79 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Gungnir
Senior Member
Avatar
694 posts
Gallery: 37 photos
Likes: 256
Joined Sep 2005
Location: Suffolk, England
     
Jul 15, 2014 16:50 |  #30

Many thanks for taking the time to try it. Much appreciated :-)


Steve
'Be the person your dog thinks you are'
#freetommy

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

46,675 views & 4 likes for this thread, 33 members have posted to it and it is followed by 6 members.
Yongnuo Macro Ring Flash - ist it any good?
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is griggt
648 guests, 142 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.