Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff Member Activities 
Thread started 10 Jan 2006 (Tuesday) 14:26
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Boston POTN Meet (3)

 
Mistabernie
'Camera Unicorn McSparkles'..
Avatar
2,745 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 29
Joined Mar 2010
Location: south of Boston, MA
     
Feb 11, 2014 14:45 |  #1291

Yeah, 135 on FF is just awesome. 35 to 135 is a bit of a big gap though, thinking I might need to pick me up an 85L v2 next year around bonus time.. you know, in ~350 days.


Donate if you love POTN! | Smugmug (external link) | Gear List & POTN Marketplace Feedback
Feel free to call me Bernie.
LIVING PROOF WHY YOU DON'T MENTION THE TITLE FAIRY...

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nathan
Can you repeat the question, please?
Avatar
7,900 posts
Gallery: 18 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 361
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Boston
     
Feb 11, 2014 20:57 |  #1292

Still thinking about getting rid of the 70-200 in favor of a 135. Not sure though... figure the images look pretty close between 2.8 versus 2, right? Especially at 200mm? One's got IS and the other gathers more light.

I might not be able to get around not having both 35 and 50. I just want everything.

Bonus time is two weeks, but wife's car just needed repairs.


Taking photos with a fancy camera does not make me a photographer.
www.nathantpham.com (external link) | Boston POTN Flickr (external link) |
5D3 x2 | 16-35L II | 50L | 85L II | 100L | 135L | 580 EX II x2

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mistabernie
'Camera Unicorn McSparkles'..
Avatar
2,745 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 29
Joined Mar 2010
Location: south of Boston, MA
     
Feb 11, 2014 21:38 |  #1293

There really is a difference between the 70-200 and the 135 I think. Not just the extra stop, but something about the combination of the aperture and the focal length.. Ask anyone in the 135L thread and I think they will agree.


Donate if you love POTN! | Smugmug (external link) | Gear List & POTN Marketplace Feedback
Feel free to call me Bernie.
LIVING PROOF WHY YOU DON'T MENTION THE TITLE FAIRY...

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jcpoulin
Goldmember
Avatar
2,447 posts
Likes: 13
Joined Jun 2006
Location: Massachusetts
     
Feb 12, 2014 11:09 |  #1294

I did the prime route before....24, sig 50, sig 85, 135, 200 all in the past....you can have it! In the 24-200 range....Swapping lens's for a stop of light or wafer thin DOF rarely a factor in most cases....the 24-70 vers 2 and 70-200 vers 2 make the quality differences almost nil IMO. I will stick to the quality zooms for 99/100 shots and miss the 1/100 need for the prime advantage. Now the long primes.......I do like my 500!!


1DX , 7D,16-35, 24-70 2.8II, 2.8L II, , 70-200 f2.8LII IS, 300 f2.8L IS, 500 f4 IS, 100-400L, Canon 100 2.8 macro, Canon 1.4X, 580ex, AB800X4
Canon CPS Member, PPA
www.capturingtimephoto​graphy.net (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Down_Shift
Goldmember
1,316 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Apr 2006
     
Feb 12, 2014 12:18 |  #1295

I have the 70-200 IS 2.8 (v1 and v2) + 135L. It still doesn't compare to the film pop you get with the 135L. In most situations when I use I decide on the135 and 70-200, the extra stop and IS isn't really the game changer. I shoot mostly headshots/portraits, so the 135L is the go to. For on the go, event work where I'm not always in my Focal length, I'll swap for the 70-200.

as far as zoom's go. I'm really dropped out on my wider primes (35L/24L) for a 24-70. I don't really shoot much in this area and the 24-70 is good enough for me. I'm really curious on the 24-70 v2. I just upgraded to the 70-200 v2 and it wasn't the biggest difference image wise against my v1 (maybe I got lucky with a good v1?)

I'd get the 135L with the 70-200.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sansational
Reverse Psychologist
Avatar
2,387 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 446
Joined Feb 2011
Location: Des Moines, IA, US
     
Feb 12, 2014 12:27 as a reply to  @ jcpoulin's post |  #1296

I love my 135L.


Andrew
flickr (external link)
Instagram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Harm
License to kill... a thread
Avatar
48,727 posts
Gallery: 13 photos
Likes: 571
Joined Jan 2008
     
Feb 12, 2014 12:31 |  #1297

I really need to test out the 135L with the 5D3...


SmugMug (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
90c4
Goldmember
1,271 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Oct 2007
     
Feb 12, 2014 16:25 |  #1298

The 135L was my favorite lens that I never used. It was either too long or too short and I found myself always using the 85 or 70-200 instead so I sold it. Fantastic lens though if the focal length is right for you.


www.facebook.com/stage​shooter (external link)http://www.facebook.co​m/stageshooter (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sansational
Reverse Psychologist
Avatar
2,387 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Likes: 446
Joined Feb 2011
Location: Des Moines, IA, US
     
Feb 12, 2014 18:22 |  #1299

Harm wrote in post #16684015 (external link)
I really need to test out the 135L with the 5D3...

Bring your camera by the shop and I'll let you test it out for a day or so.


Andrew
flickr (external link)
Instagram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
symbolphoto
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,628 posts
Likes: 18
Joined Nov 2005
Location: Boston, MA
     
Feb 12, 2014 19:32 |  #1300

90c4 wrote in post #16684622 (external link)
The 135L was my favorite lens that I never used. It was either too long or too short and I found myself always using the 85 or 70-200 instead so I sold it. Fantastic lens though if the focal length is right for you.

Felt the same exact way....




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nathan
Can you repeat the question, please?
Avatar
7,900 posts
Gallery: 18 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 361
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Boston
     
Feb 12, 2014 20:14 |  #1301

sansational wrote in post #16684885 (external link)
Bring your camera by the shop and I'll let you test it out for a day or so.

Not if I get there first :p


Taking photos with a fancy camera does not make me a photographer.
www.nathantpham.com (external link) | Boston POTN Flickr (external link) |
5D3 x2 | 16-35L II | 50L | 85L II | 100L | 135L | 580 EX II x2

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Harm
License to kill... a thread
Avatar
48,727 posts
Gallery: 13 photos
Likes: 571
Joined Jan 2008
     
Feb 12, 2014 20:32 |  #1302

sansational wrote in post #16684885 (external link)
Bring your camera by the shop and I'll let you test it out for a day or so.

Comes free with a purchase of a coffee, right?

Nathan wrote in post #16685167 (external link)
Not if I get there first :p

:lol:


SmugMug (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jeremiah ­ True
Member
Avatar
193 posts
Joined Nov 2010
Location: Haverhill, MA
     
Feb 13, 2014 08:17 |  #1303

Hi All, It's been a while but I wanted to reach out and see if anyone knew of darkroom space that could be rented in the city/surrounding areas? I am shooting more large format film and the processing costs are not inexpensive. I tried Colortek but they only use dip & dunk for color films, rolling processor for b&w. Duggal in NYC is who I am using now but after shipping costs, the price is too high. I kinda want to try it myself again and wondered if anyone knew anyone who had space/equipment/chemic​als...

Alternatively, might just shoot and store and then send large bundles to NYC to cut the price-per down and use Colortek for the color and slides.


View my photostream on Flickr (external link)
JTruePhotography.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
scotteisenphotography
Never been blessed
Avatar
4,147 posts
Likes: 17
Joined Aug 2007
     
Feb 13, 2014 08:27 |  #1304

Jeremiah True wrote in post #16686190 (external link)
Hi All, It's been a while but I wanted to reach out and see if anyone knew of darkroom space that could be rented in the city/surrounding areas? I am shooting more large format film and the processing costs are not inexpensive. I tried Colortek but they only use dip & dunk for color films, rolling processor for b&w. Duggal in NYC is who I am using now but after shipping costs, the price is too high. I kinda want to try it myself again and wondered if anyone knew anyone who had space/equipment/chemic​als...

Alternatively, might just shoot and store and then send large bundles to NYC to cut the price-per down and use Colortek for the color and slides.

NESOP rents out...and then there is another one somewhere in Boston, I'll ask my girlfriend, but it's like $75/day


2X Canon 1Dx|Canon 1D Mark IV|Canon 5D Mark III|14mm 2.8L II|16-35mm 2.8L II|24mm 1.4L II|35mm 1.4L|50mm 1.2L |85mm 1.2L II|70-200 2.8L IS|200mm 2.0L IS|300mm 2.8L IS|400mm 2.8L IS|800mm 5.6L IS| 580EX II| 600EX RT II|

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mistabernie
'Camera Unicorn McSparkles'..
Avatar
2,745 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 29
Joined Mar 2010
Location: south of Boston, MA
     
Feb 13, 2014 10:22 |  #1305

Scott, would Panopticon do stuff like this?


Donate if you love POTN! | Smugmug (external link) | Gear List & POTN Marketplace Feedback
Feel free to call me Bernie.
LIVING PROOF WHY YOU DON'T MENTION THE TITLE FAIRY...

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

884,343 views & 251 likes for this thread, 67 members have posted to it and it is followed by 45 members.
Boston POTN Meet (3)
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff Member Activities 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Thunderstream
1696 guests, 100 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.