Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
Thread started 03 Oct 2013 (Thursday) 13:46
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

How large of a soft modifier do you think was used in this photo?

 
thedcmule2
Goldmember
1,125 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Nov 2011
     
Oct 03, 2013 13:46 |  #1

http://rapradar.com …/uploads/2013/0​9/ryan.jpg (external link)

Take note of how soft the transitions between midtones and shadows are. If I had to guess, they are using one very large softbox or umbrella or octa firing from the top left. Either the flash is fired at very low power or it's being feathered so only the edge of the light is touching them. How do you guys think this photo was lit?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jcolman
Goldmember
2,666 posts
Gallery: 17 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 694
Joined Mar 2008
Location: North Carolina
     
Oct 03, 2013 16:56 |  #2

My guess would be a beauty dish instead of a soft box. But it could also have been a medium sized soft box with a grid.


www.jimcolmanphotograp​hy.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
thedcmule2
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
1,125 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Nov 2011
     
Oct 03, 2013 16:57 |  #3

Theres actually a difference between how beauty dish and softbox light looks?!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
The ­ Loft ­ Studios
Goldmember
1,072 posts
Likes: 9
Joined Oct 2009
Location: Houston, Texas
     
Oct 03, 2013 18:11 as a reply to  @ thedcmule2's post |  #4

Judging by the way the shadow is falling on the wall, it seems as though they are probably no more than 4-5 feet from the wall. Now judging by how soft the shadow is considering they are on about 4-5 feet from the wall, I would say that the "size" of the modifier used was 60" (5 feet) or larger. Now, what type of modifier, who knows... But,I'll take a stab and go with something like a 60" to 86" type of umbrella.


MARK

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
windpig
Chopped liver
Avatar
15,915 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 2259
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Just South of Ballard
     
Oct 03, 2013 18:25 |  #5

^^^
What he says, plus the contrast makes it look like an umbrella was used.


Would you like to buy a vowel?
Go ahead, spin the wheel.
flickr (external link)
I'm accross the canal just south of Ballard, the town Seattle usurped in 1907.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dmward
Cream of the Crop
9,083 posts
Gallery: 29 photos
Likes: 1548
Joined Jun 2009
Location: Metro Chicago
     
Oct 03, 2013 22:13 |  #6

considering the relatively hard transition from shadow to highlight next to the nose of the guy on the right I think it was probably two lights. One right next to the lens axis as fill and another about 30* camera left. Ratio looks like about 1:1 or 1:2. Since the shadow transition is relatively sharp I'm going to guess that the light sources were relatively small or far away.


David | Sharing my Insights, Knowledge & Experience (external link) | dmwfotos website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
abbadon31
Goldmember
Avatar
4,997 posts
Gallery: 264 photos
Best ofs: 10
Likes: 6766
Joined Jul 2009
Location: SOCAL
     
Oct 03, 2013 22:27 |  #7

http://news.psu.edu …d%20ryan%20lewi​s%2013.jpg (external link)


I AM SHOM

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
thedcmule2
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
1,125 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Nov 2011
     
Oct 03, 2013 22:47 |  #8

dmward wrote in post #16344708 (external link)
considering the relatively hard transition from shadow to highlight next to the nose of the guy on the right I think it was probably two lights. One right next to the lens axis as fill and another about 30* camera left. Ratio looks like about 1:1 or 1:2. Since the shadow transition is relatively sharp I'm going to guess that the light sources were relatively small or far away.

Couldnt the nose shadow just be because hes further than the guy on the left?

@abbadon31: ...?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
abbadon31
Goldmember
Avatar
4,997 posts
Gallery: 264 photos
Best ofs: 10
Likes: 6766
Joined Jul 2009
Location: SOCAL
     
Oct 03, 2013 22:56 |  #9

thedcmule2 wrote in post #16344756 (external link)
Couldnt the nose shadow just be because hes further than the guy on the left?

@abbadon31: ...?


You can tell more by seeing the full image


I AM SHOM

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jcolman
Goldmember
2,666 posts
Gallery: 17 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 694
Joined Mar 2008
Location: North Carolina
     
Oct 04, 2013 07:20 |  #10

After seeing the full size image, I'm going with a gridded softbox. Maybe 36" or so.


www.jimcolmanphotograp​hy.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dmward
Cream of the Crop
9,083 posts
Gallery: 29 photos
Likes: 1548
Joined Jun 2009
Location: Metro Chicago
     
Oct 04, 2013 08:18 |  #11

It was also high given the shadow behind them.


David | Sharing my Insights, Knowledge & Experience (external link) | dmwfotos website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
abbadon31
Goldmember
Avatar
4,997 posts
Gallery: 264 photos
Best ofs: 10
Likes: 6766
Joined Jul 2009
Location: SOCAL
     
Oct 05, 2013 04:15 |  #12

it also shows that its a composite shot


I AM SHOM

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dmward
Cream of the Crop
9,083 posts
Gallery: 29 photos
Likes: 1548
Joined Jun 2009
Location: Metro Chicago
     
Oct 05, 2013 11:36 |  #13

^^ I agree.


David | Sharing my Insights, Knowledge & Experience (external link) | dmwfotos website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Condotierri
Member
58 posts
Joined Jan 2013
Location: Bay Area
     
Oct 05, 2013 13:29 |  #14

Yup to composite. My guess is they bounced light off of a v-flat or used a 5' softbox.


5D3, 60D || 8 primes, 9 zooms
Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,809 views & 0 likes for this thread, 7 members have posted to it.
How large of a soft modifier do you think was used in this photo?
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Monkeytoes
1346 guests, 176 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.