Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
Thread started 06 Oct 2013 (Sunday) 22:26
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Fotodiox vs Paul C Buff Softboxes

 
aliengin
Goldmember
1,159 posts
Likes: 78
Joined Mar 2011
     
Oct 06, 2013 22:26 |  #1

Anyone used both? How do they compare? They both price almost similar.


Ali Engin Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dmward
Cream of the Crop
9,083 posts
Gallery: 29 photos
Likes: 1548
Joined Jun 2009
Location: Metro Chicago
     
Oct 06, 2013 22:32 |  #2

Buff are better quality.
Fotodiox offer more variety relative to size.

I presume we are talking about foldable buff and EZ-Pro.

For the sizes available I'd buy the Buff foldables, then add the EZ-PROS for other sizes.


David | Sharing my Insights, Knowledge & Experience (external link) | dmwfotos website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
abbadon31
Goldmember
Avatar
4,997 posts
Gallery: 264 photos
Best ofs: 10
Likes: 6766
Joined Jul 2009
Location: SOCAL
     
Oct 06, 2013 23:28 |  #3

PB has better costumer service


I AM SHOM

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PhilF
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,737 posts
Likes: 608
Joined Jan 2010
Location: Valencia, CA
     
Oct 07, 2013 01:14 |  #4

Fotodiox and PB ...awesome customer service.

I had one of my strobes service by PB.... took long...but they sent me updates all the time via email

I had a part of my Octabox from Fotodiox (EZ Pro) destroyed...told them about it...they send me the part FREE ASAP... talk about customer service.


http://philfernandezph​otography.com (external link)
http://www.philfashion​photography.com (external link)
https://www.instagram.​com/philfernimagery/ (external link)
https://www.facebook.c​om/philfphotography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
aliengin
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
1,159 posts
Likes: 78
Joined Mar 2011
     
Oct 07, 2013 06:40 |  #5

How about the light quality between two and ease of setup on location?


Ali Engin Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dmward
Cream of the Crop
9,083 posts
Gallery: 29 photos
Likes: 1548
Joined Jun 2009
Location: Metro Chicago
     
Oct 07, 2013 08:41 |  #6

They are both umbrella type frames so setup is a snap. Light from any large modifier has more to do with how you control it than the modifier itself. Both deliver good light.

Fotodiox used to include a 10" plastic disk that slid onto the center shaft to deflect the light so there was no direct line between the flash tube and the front diffusion panel. It is a very useful tool.

I've also found that both have good customer service.


David | Sharing my Insights, Knowledge & Experience (external link) | dmwfotos website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sircanon
Member
226 posts
Joined Oct 2011
     
Oct 07, 2013 23:17 |  #7

+1 for the fotodiox


RZ67, Pentax 67, 5D mk II
Add me on Flickr! (external link)
www.camwilliamsphoto.c​om (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
keano12
Member
Avatar
126 posts
Likes: 12
Joined Jan 2015
     
Mar 28, 2015 20:38 as a reply to  @ dmward's post |  #8

This was my initial concern. Where do you see build quality difference in the SB material thickness? Have you tried both? Have they both lasted?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
keano12
Member
Avatar
126 posts
Likes: 12
Joined Jan 2015
     
Mar 28, 2015 20:49 |  #9

This doesn't look to good

http://youtu.be/lsuEbE​TfpAU (external link)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
windpig
Chopped liver
Avatar
15,916 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 2262
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Just South of Ballard
Post edited over 8 years ago by windpig. (3 edits in all)
     
Mar 28, 2015 21:51 as a reply to  @ keano12's post |  #10

^^^^^^^^

Bull crap. This guy doesn't know what he's talking about. Light leakage around the edges...............sh​eesh. Unable to direct the light, nonsense, nothing is going to be directional without a recessed diffuser, that's why Elinchrom offers their hooded diffuser. You want direct-able light with this or any of the Fotodiox ExPros? Use only the inner diffuser or at least recess the front diffuser in as much as possible.

The Fotodiox are a great value and work most excellently.

I have Elinchrom, Fotodiox and Photoflex modifiers.


Would you like to buy a vowel?
Go ahead, spin the wheel.
flickr (external link)
I'm accross the canal just south of Ballard, the town Seattle usurped in 1907.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
110yd
Senior Member
790 posts
Likes: 35
Joined Jan 2005
     
Mar 28, 2015 22:29 as a reply to  @ keano12's post |  #11

The Fotodiox EzPro is a good value for the $$ spent. I own Elinchrom and Fotodiox.
The struggle in the video to close the softbox was operator error. If you place the
softbox against your chest or the floor it is easy to open or close. I would not think of
trying to close one the way it was done in the video.

Hope this helps,

110yd




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
abbadon31
Goldmember
Avatar
4,997 posts
Gallery: 264 photos
Best ofs: 10
Likes: 6766
Joined Jul 2009
Location: SOCAL
     
Mar 28, 2015 23:01 |  #12

keano12 wrote in post #17496001 (external link)
This doesn't look to good

http://youtu.be/lsuEbE​TfpAU (external link)


LOL that guy is a %^$# and has no clue how to use or operate the Fotodiox. If he read the instructions he would have known how to open and close the octa and seems like he just pulled it out of the box and made a video to bash it.

I have had mine for over 4 years and have had no issues line out in his video.

I both PCB and Fotodiox and I find them both to be good quality, but I got better CS from PCB.

I have all the sizes of the EZ-Pro and find them to be the best solution because they are road tuff/ sizes / same Kelvin temps. I try not to use different brands of modifiers and strobe when shooting, because of the inconsistent kelvin temps.

https://www.youtube.co​m/watch?v=RNitRabT9yw (external link)


I AM SHOM

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PhilF
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,737 posts
Likes: 608
Joined Jan 2010
Location: Valencia, CA
     
Mar 29, 2015 02:12 |  #13

both have awesome customer service.

My Fotodiox 60 octabox shaft failed on me at a gig and I called it in ... they sent me 3 extra shafts...for FREE


http://philfernandezph​otography.com (external link)
http://www.philfashion​photography.com (external link)
https://www.instagram.​com/philfernimagery/ (external link)
https://www.facebook.c​om/philfphotography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PhilF
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,737 posts
Likes: 608
Joined Jan 2010
Location: Valencia, CA
Post edited over 8 years ago by PhilF.
     
Mar 29, 2015 02:16 as a reply to  @ keano12's post |  #14

People like these shouldn't be doing reviews... pretty obvious he doesn't know how to use it.

stupid. To open and lock it...you put it down on the floor and use your weight to open it. It's no rocket science.


http://philfernandezph​otography.com (external link)
http://www.philfashion​photography.com (external link)
https://www.instagram.​com/philfernimagery/ (external link)
https://www.facebook.c​om/philfphotography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PhilF
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,737 posts
Likes: 608
Joined Jan 2010
Location: Valencia, CA
     
Mar 29, 2015 02:21 |  #15

btw.... it looks amazing on my Profotos


http://philfernandezph​otography.com (external link)
http://www.philfashion​photography.com (external link)
https://www.instagram.​com/philfernimagery/ (external link)
https://www.facebook.c​om/philfphotography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

8,869 views & 2 likes for this thread, 13 members have posted to it and it is followed by 8 members.
Fotodiox vs Paul C Buff Softboxes
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is zachary24
1410 guests, 113 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.