Hogloff wrote in post #16354928
It will just make you look like your trying to pull something over their head. You take 100 snaps and deliver 10 that are sequentially numbered and think you are actually fooling them. The only fool here would be YOU.
I don't think people take it that far. I number sequentially for my own organization purposes and to make proofing easier. I have an excel spreadsheet for batch uploads to my website and I'd go mad if I had to fill it in with the K09Xxxxx.jpg numbers from one camera, JI0Dxxxx.jpg from another camera, and 6J2Ixxxx.jpg of yet a third camera instead of YYYY-MM-DD-xxxx.jpg for all cameras. The latter being sequential means I have ONE template of 2,000 rows and merely do a find/replace for the YYY-MM-DD part and then delete the unneeded rows. It's sooooo much faster than trying to match up missing file numbers or worse - enter them all by hand. Plus, it's easier for them because they can make a simple list: "Image 1, 12, 17, 56, 73" etc.