Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 29 Jan 2006 (Sunday) 18:53
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Need Some Help!!!

 
wolfcub
Hatchling
2 posts
Joined Jan 2006
     
Jan 29, 2006 18:53 |  #1

Can someone give me a crash course on the following two features:

White Balance

Image Resolution

With regard to White Balance, I am comparing three camers, two of them have the standard "Presets" and also offer a "Manual" feature. The third does not have this feature. How important is this feature?? If this has to do with the amount of "white Light" allowed on the picture than is this something that could be "fixed" in a photo shop program???

With regard to Inamge Resolution, I am used to seeing 640 x 480, 1600 x 1200, etc. Again two of the three have the "usual" resolutions but the third has the following:

2048 x 1536, 1656 x 1242, 1200 x 900, 2576 x 1932, 2576 x 1716

Are these better, worse, no significant difference??

Thanks for any assistance you can provide.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Jan 29, 2006 19:10 |  #2

Welcome to POTN :)

Now let me introduce you to google, an excellent search engine, that can answer many of your questions :p
http://www.google.co.n​z …en&q=define:Whi​te+balance (external link)
http://www.photoxels.c​om/tutorial_white-balance.html (external link)

Best tell us what cameras you're looking at, there's not really enough info there to give you good information. On a digital SLR a "custom/manual" white ballance is very helpful, and any camera that doesn't have it is probably aimed at people who want a point and shoot.

With resolution more is better.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
wolfcub
THREAD ­ STARTER
Hatchling
2 posts
Joined Jan 2006
     
Jan 29, 2006 19:23 |  #3

I am looking at:

Canon Powershot A520
Panasonic DMC-LZ2
Kodak EasyShare C340

The Kodak is the one with the "non-traditional" features the other two have.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Jan 29, 2006 19:40 |  #4

When i'm looking at compact cameras I just read reviews at http://www.dpreview.co​m (external link) or steves reviews (I forget the URL) - and sometimes I just read the conclusion not the whole article. I only ever shoot those cameras on auto, which seems to work quite well.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
EOS_JD
Goldmember
2,925 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Lanarkshire, Scotland
     
Jan 30, 2006 08:13 |  #5

wolfcub wrote:
Can someone give me a crash course on the following two features:

White Balance

Image Resolution

With regard to White Balance, I am comparing three camers, two of them have the standard "Presets" and also offer a "Manual" feature. The third does not have this feature. How important is this feature?? If this has to do with the amount of "white Light" allowed on the picture than is this something that could be "fixed" in a photo shop program???

With regard to Inamge Resolution, I am used to seeing 640 x 480, 1600 x 1200, etc. Again two of the three have the "usual" resolutions but the third has the following:

2048 x 1536, 1656 x 1242, 1200 x 900, 2576 x 1932, 2576 x 1716

Are these better, worse, no significant difference??

Thanks for any assistance you can provide.

White Balance - When using the camera WB settings, the camera tries to adjust internally to compensate for the colour of the light it sees. A camera sees light from the likes of Tunsten light differently from our eyes. Read the links above for comments on this.

Resolution - "I am used to seeing 640 x 480, 1600 x 1200, etc." - Sounds like screen resolurtion?

2048 x 1536, 1656 x 1242, 1200 x 900, 2576 x 1932, 2576 x 1716 - This is the image size in pixels. 2048x1536=3.14 Mega pixels.

Do not confuse the two. The bigger the numbers indicate larger (higher res) images.

Read the links provided and search the net for advice. There's lots of info on the subject out there.

cheers
Jim


All My Gear
5D MkIII & 5D MKII + Grips | 24-70 f2.8L IS | 24-105 f4L IS | 70-200 f2.8L IS MkII | 50 f/1.4 | 85 f1.8 | 100 f2.8 | 1.4x MkII | Tamron 17-35 f2.8-4

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
goatee
"nice but dim"
Avatar
5,239 posts
Joined May 2005
Location: North of London, UK
     
Jan 31, 2006 05:07 as a reply to  @ tim's post |  #6

tim wrote:
When i'm looking at compact cameras I just read reviews at http://www.dpreview.co​m (external link) or steves reviews (I forget the URL) - and sometimes I just read the conclusion not the whole article. I only ever shoot those cameras on auto, which seems to work quite well.

Tim, that URL is http://www.steves-digicams.com/ (external link)


D7100, 50mm f/1.8, 18-140mm f/3.5-5.6, 70-300mm f/3.5-5.6 VR, SB800
https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=552906flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Jan 31, 2006 05:46 |  #7

I knew someone would know it :)


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
goatee
"nice but dim"
Avatar
5,239 posts
Joined May 2005
Location: North of London, UK
     
Jan 31, 2006 05:54 |  #8

Before I went out and bought my 300D, I was glued to dpreview, steve's digicams, and a few other sites - only found POTN afterwards!


D7100, 50mm f/1.8, 18-140mm f/3.5-5.6, 70-300mm f/3.5-5.6 VR, SB800
https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=552906flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

801 views & 0 likes for this thread, 4 members have posted to it.
Need Some Help!!!
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
1596 guests, 118 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.