Hey guys, I need some help!

joeseph wrote in post #16362346
100-400mm... there are no substitutes for cubic inches!

"There is no replacement for displacement"

DreDaze wrote in post #16361743
i'd get another prime...

Me to. Sell 35-105 and 70-300 (you have 70-200+ ext.) and buy 135L

Maybe it's me, but you have a lot of cross over there... Trim the fat and replace with better...

IMO the 35-135 is unnecessary with the other lenses..

I say ditch the 70-300 and 35-135 to offset the 100-400 L... Or just ditch those two and get something different.. Like a tilt shift/lens baby thing-a-ma-jig...

YMMV...

IMO the 35-135 is unnecessary with the other lenses..

That was the second lens I bought after the 50 1.8. I bought it for a special purpose but soon discovered that it was at best average (maybe below average) and that there were probably better lens for my needs, even apart from IQ. Alas, we grow too soon old and too late smart! <g>

hrblaine wrote in post #16361589
I'm getting antsy - I want a new lens but I can't figure out what to get.

What images are you trying to take that you can't with your current lenses? Until we know that, it is really hard to offer you pertinent advice that will help enable you to achieve your photographic vision.