The last wedding I did:
Sigma 35mm 1.4 --> ~50% of the shots
Canon 24-105 --> 35% of the shots
Canon 85mm 1.8 --> 15% of the shots.
Not counting a few quirky fisheye shots.
TweakMDS Goldmember 2,242 posts Likes: 1 Joined Nov 2008 Location: Netherlands More info | Oct 18, 2013 11:41 | #16 The last wedding I did: Some of my lenses focus beyond infinity...!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
thepilgrimsdream Member 100 posts Joined Jul 2013 Location: Philadelphia More info | Last wedding: 6d, 5d Mark 2, 135L, 85L II, 17-40L, 85 1.8
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nick_Reading.UK THREAD STARTER Senior Member 836 posts Likes: 1 Joined Nov 2011 Location: Reading, Berkshire, UK More info | Oct 18, 2013 18:02 | #18 thepilgrimsdream wrote in post #16381138 Last wedding: 6d 5d mk2 135L 85 1.8 17-40L My biggest weakness was the 17-40L being f4. I hope to get a 35mm 1.4 soon. But the 85 1.2L II is temping and I might end up delay the 35 1.4 purchase for a while, plus I'm not primarily a wedding shooter There is almost a grands difference (£££) between the 85mil 1.8 and 1.2 ! Is it really that much better / worth it ?? EOS 5Dmk3 X2, 60D, EF24-70mm f2.8L mk2, EF70-200mm f2.8L IS mk2, EF85mm f1.8, EF50mm f1.4, EF50mm f1.8 mk1(350D with 18-55mm Sh"kit" lens).
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nick_Reading.UK THREAD STARTER Senior Member 836 posts Likes: 1 Joined Nov 2011 Location: Reading, Berkshire, UK More info | Oct 18, 2013 18:04 | #19 I keep on noticing the 85mm and 35 mm popping up EOS 5Dmk3 X2, 60D, EF24-70mm f2.8L mk2, EF70-200mm f2.8L IS mk2, EF85mm f1.8, EF50mm f1.4, EF50mm f1.8 mk1(350D with 18-55mm Sh"kit" lens).
LOG IN TO REPLY |
KenCravillion Senior Member 448 posts Likes: 25 Joined Nov 2006 Location: Oshkosh, WI More info | Oct 19, 2013 08:00 | #20 5d3 Ken Cravillion http://www.kgcphoto.com
LOG IN TO REPLY |
modchild Goldmember 1,469 posts Likes: 3 Joined Jul 2011 Location: Lincoln, Uk More info | Oct 19, 2013 09:20 | #21 I had a 5D3 and 7D body and used a 24-70 on the 5D3 and swapped between that and a 17-40 for the ceremony and group shots. I went with a 35 f2 and 85 f1.8 on the 7D most of the time and used a 100 f2.8L macro for the ring shots and a few portraits at the reception afterwards. EOS 5D MkIII, EOS 70D, EOS 650D, EOS M, Canon 24-70 f2.8L MkII, Canon 70-200 f2.8L IS MkII, Canon 100 f2.8L Macro, Canon 17-40 f4L IS, Canon 24-105 f4L IS, Canon 300 f4L IS, Canon 85 f1.8, Canon 50 f1.4, Canon 40 f2.8 STM, Canon 35 f2, Sigma 150-500 OS, Tamron 18-270 PZD, Tamron 28-300 VC, 580EX II Flash, Nissin Di866 MkII Flash, Sigma EM 140 Macro Flash and other bits.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
marcosv Senior Member 775 posts Joined Oct 2009 Location: San Jose, CA More info | Oct 19, 2013 10:42 | #22 Nick_Reading.UK wrote in post #16381600 There is almost a grands difference (£££) between the 85mil 1.8 and 1.2 ! Is it really that much better / worth it ?? Yes. 85L is a signature portrait lens in the L lineup. EOS-M | 40D | 5DII | 5DIII | EF-M 22 | EF-M 18-55 | 10-22 | 17-55 | 17-40L | 24-70L mk II | 24-105L | 70-200/2.8L IS mk II| 35L | 85L II |35/2 | 40/2.8 pancake | 50/1.8 | 50/1.4 | 100/2 | Rokinon 14/2.8 | 90 EX | 270 EX II | 580 EXII | 600 EX-RT
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is ealarcon 1154 guests, 154 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||