Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos Video and Sound Editing 
Thread started 22 Oct 2013 (Tuesday) 17:10
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Help choosing video camera

 
Meanie
Member
138 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jul 2011
Location: North Detroit Subs
     
Oct 22, 2013 17:10 |  #1

Forgive me if I'm in the wrong category.

I'm searching for a video camera and narrowed down to the four choices you'll see in the link provided. I'm trying to determine why one camera is a much greater price when it appears the features of it are less than another camera. To be more specific, I'm viewing the Canon Vixia HF R400 (second from left on comparison page) and that of the Vixia HF M52 (far right). The R400 appears to have better optic capability, better video format capability and more input/output connections than the HF M52, yet the HF M52 is roughly $500 more.

Can someone explain what I'm missing?

Thank you

http://www.bhphotovide​o.com …3B838772-REG%3B838769-REG (external link)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Hot ­ Bob
Goldmember
1,045 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 101
Joined Jul 2009
Location: Sanger, Texas
     
Oct 22, 2013 17:51 |  #2

The sensor on the m52 is significantly larger with larger photosites which equates to much better low-light performance.

Bob


Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Meanie
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
138 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jul 2011
Location: North Detroit Subs
     
Oct 24, 2013 09:53 as a reply to  @ Hot Bob's post |  #3

Is that enough to warrant a $500 price difference?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Hot ­ Bob
Goldmember
1,045 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 101
Joined Jul 2009
Location: Sanger, Texas
     
Oct 24, 2013 10:05 as a reply to  @ Meanie's post |  #4

Well, Canon thinks it is! If you are going to be shooting in low-light conditions, it could mean the difference between a clean image and a noisy mess. If you will always shoot in bright daylight it might not mean as much. The sensor is arguably the most important part of the camera. You're asking about a $500 difference in price; there are other cameras where a different sensor makes a $10k difference.

http://www.red.com …rade#stage_epic​-x-upgrade (external link)

Bob


Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Meanie
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
138 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jul 2011
Location: North Detroit Subs
     
Oct 24, 2013 16:38 as a reply to  @ Hot Bob's post |  #5

Wow, I didn't realize such.

Is there any way to determine the definition of "low light"? Or perhaps a spec sheet of some sort calculating the specs on a camera and what low light specs it equates with.

Thank you.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Hot ­ Bob
Goldmember
1,045 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 101
Joined Jul 2009
Location: Sanger, Texas
     
Oct 24, 2013 17:59 |  #6

Meanie wrote in post #16396388 (external link)
Wow, I didn't realize such.

Is there any way to determine the definition of "low light"? Or perhaps a spec sheet of some sort calculating the specs on a camera and what low light specs it equates with.

Thank you.

It is right there in your comparison chart. Look for "Lux". Then read this:

What is Lux? (external link)

Bob


Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Meanie
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
138 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jul 2011
Location: North Detroit Subs
     
Oct 24, 2013 19:37 as a reply to  @ Hot Bob's post |  #7

Ok, one last question as I hate to be a pest, but when reading the specs on the M52, it states the LUX @ 1.2 for regular mode and .1 in low light mode. Does that mean the lowest it'll go is 1.2 and still maintain a good quality (no grain or less grainy) and the same if set to low light mode?

Thank you again for helping me understand.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Hot ­ Bob
Goldmember
1,045 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 101
Joined Jul 2009
Location: Sanger, Texas
     
Oct 24, 2013 20:40 as a reply to  @ Meanie's post |  #8

I'm going to guess that low-light mode is infra-red. The picture will be colorless.

If you go to Canon's website, you should be able to download the manual for any camera you are looking at.

Bob


Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,409 views & 0 likes for this thread, 2 members have posted to it.
Help choosing video camera
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos Video and Sound Editing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is ANebinger
1211 guests, 176 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.