gonzogolf wrote in post #16395580
Wide, as in wide angle, the shortest focal length on the zoom. Long as in longer focal length is the zoom range.
So they're ends of the range. Thank you. I come to photography from the art side, not the technology side, and people use jargon without explaining it. In ordinary English, "wide" and "long" aren't opposites. The opposite of wide is narrow, and the opposite of long is short.
Tommydigi wrote in post #16395685
Not sure I follow what your issue is. Just because the lens goes down to 2.8 does not mean you need to shoot at 2.8. You can stop it down to 5.6 or F8 or whatever.
Right, and I often do, and I don't know what the 2.8 signifies. It clearly isn't the minimum aperture. The other end of "1.8–2.8," the left end, is the maximum aperture. EDIT: Taylor answered this part while I was writing.
The reason it varies as you zoom in is because of the limitations of the lens itself.
I don't understand what you mean about geometry
Geometry in the sense that articles about how cameras work are illustrated with diagrams of their insides that show what happens. The light comes in here, the lens refracts it like this, the sensor records it upside down like this . . . there are lines and angles, and you can see how the geometric relations go. The geometry would be visible if I could see inside the camera.
I could understand a physical explanation of this kind: "When you change the _____ setting from _____ to _____ , the _____ moves [toward/away from] the _____ . This movement takes up all the space in the _____ , and therefore the _____ doesn't have room to _____ ."
I could also understand if someone said "There's always a tradeoff between zoom and large aperture because it's physically impossible to have both of them" or, alternatively, "It's possible to have zoom and large aperture at the same time, but the camera would have to be a lot bigger and more expensive."