Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
Thread started 26 Oct 2013 (Saturday) 17:43
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

HSS and power consumption

 
tonytony
Member
170 posts
Joined Jun 2005
Location: Ireland
     
Oct 26, 2013 17:43 |  #1

I have a few questions in regards to HSS, mostly about power consumption. I was wondering if you could help clarify a few things for me.


  1. How much power does HSS consume on average compared to regular sync speed? For example, Eneloops might give me 250 speedlite pops at 1/125 at full power. What ballpark number can I expect at 1/500? 50, 100, 200 pops?
  2. Related to my previous question, is there a difference between 1/320 and 1/600 in HSS mode in terms of battery consumption? I'm assuming that the longer pulsation required by 1/320 would waste more power. Is this correct?
  3. if I set my flash at 1/1 in HSS mode the output capacity is reduced by about 2 stops I believe. Will the proportions be maintained as I set it to 1/2, 1/4, 1/8, 1/16, etc? I mean, will 1/16 be 4 stop less than regular full power or 4 stop less than the -2EV output (so 6 stops in total)? The flash, even in HSS mode is technically capable of outputting regular 1/16 amount of light, but I'm not sure if it does. If it does, then the progression in HSS mode is no longer linear.


Thank you in advance.



  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
oldvultureface
Goldmember
Avatar
4,279 posts
Gallery: 85 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 385
Joined Jun 2008
Location: Northwest Indiana USA
     
Oct 26, 2013 18:15 |  #2

tonytony wrote in post #16401476 (external link)
... is there a difference between 1/320 and 1/600 in HSS mode in terms of battery consumption? I'm assuming that the longer pulsation required by 1/320 would waste more power. Is this correct?

Beyond sync speed, the shutter curtains are moving as fast as they can. The exposure time on the sensor is determined by the size of the shutter slit. The speedlite has to rapidly pulse the same length of time whether your shutter speed is 1/320 or 1/600 to fully illuminate the sensor.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rudy_216
Senior Member
299 posts
Joined Oct 2008
     
Oct 26, 2013 18:18 |  #3

tonytony wrote in post #16401476 (external link)
2. Related to my previous question, is there a difference between 1/320 and 1/600 in HSS mode in terms of battery consumption? I'm assuming that the longer pulsation required by 1/320 would waste more power. Is this correct?

No. The pulse duration is the same in HSS. The higher the sync speed you use on your camera the more power you will consume for the same exposure.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SkipD
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
20,476 posts
Likes: 165
Joined Dec 2002
Location: Southeastern WI, USA
     
Oct 26, 2013 18:27 |  #4

rudy_216 wrote in post #16401534 (external link)
The higher the sync speed you use on your camera the more power you will consume for the same exposure.

Why do you say that?

The slit between the leading and trailing shutter leaves travels across the film/sensor at the same speed for every shutter speed faster than the "max sync speed". Thus, the Speedlite should be creating pretty much the same pulse train for all the shutter speeds faster than the "max sync speed".


Skip Douglas
A few cameras and over 50 years behind them .....
..... but still learning all the time.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Curtis ­ N
Master Flasher
Avatar
19,129 posts
Likes: 11
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Northern Illinois, US
     
Oct 26, 2013 19:45 |  #5

Though it's technically a rapid series of weak flashes, think of HSS as a continuous light source that lasts throughout the duration of shutter curtain movement. The shutter will limit the amount of this light that reaches the sensor, just as it limits any other continuous light source.

The distance scale on the back of the flash tells the story.
At 1/250 f/4 ISO 100, zoomed to 50mm, the 580EX II will indicate a distance of 40 ft.
Click the shutter speed up to 1/320 and open the aperture to f/3.5 (the same ambient exposure) and the distance scale drops to 20 ft. This is the efficiency-robbing reality of HSS.

Now if you continue to speed up the shutter and open the aperture to keep the ambient exposure the same, the distance scale will stay where it's at from that point on.

However, if you speed up the shutter without opening the aperture, you will see the distance continue to drop with faster shutter speeds.

When manually setting the flash power, whether in normal flash or HSS mode, you will lose 1/2 the distance range for every two stops you dial down the power. Hopefully that makes sense.


"If you're not having fun, your pictures will reflect that." - Joe McNally
Chicago area POTN events (external link)
Flash Photography 101 | The EOS Flash Bible  (external link)| Techniques for Better On-Camera Flash (external link) | How to Use Flash Outdoors| Excel-based DOF Calculator (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonytony
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
170 posts
Joined Jun 2005
Location: Ireland
     
Oct 26, 2013 21:05 |  #6

Curtis, your clear explanation totally clears question 2. Do you have suggestions for 1 and 3?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Curtis ­ N
Master Flasher
Avatar
19,129 posts
Likes: 11
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Northern Illinois, US
     
Oct 26, 2013 21:39 |  #7

The question of how much power you lose with HSS is hard to answer precisely, since you can't use normal flash above X-sync speed and you can't use HSS at or below X-sync speed. You can't make a direct comparison. But the distance scale indicates a loss of about two stops, so in theory the flash is using four times as much energy for any given shot, and a set of batteries would be good for only 1/4 as many shots in a given situation.

For question #3, again, the distance scale will tell the tale. 1/16 power on HSS will get you half the distance of 1/16 power using regular flash at X-sync speed with compensating aperture settings.

I have a feeling you're overthinking this, Tony. ;)


"If you're not having fun, your pictures will reflect that." - Joe McNally
Chicago area POTN events (external link)
Flash Photography 101 | The EOS Flash Bible  (external link)| Techniques for Better On-Camera Flash (external link) | How to Use Flash Outdoors| Excel-based DOF Calculator (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonytony
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
170 posts
Joined Jun 2005
Location: Ireland
     
Oct 26, 2013 21:48 |  #8

Thanks Curtis. I think I got it. Hmm, power packs might be needed then. :)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,462 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4548
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
Oct 27, 2013 11:16 |  #9

Tony,
About number of flashes...you flash's power capacitor is the bucket of power, your batteries are merely the supply to the hose that fills the bucket.

  • NO MORE power can be put thru the flashtube than is contained within the bucket. Whether you fire conventional flash at full power, or you fire in HSS mode, the size of the bucket is unchanged....SAME quantity of water from the bucket....same amount of electricity is expended.
  • NO MORE power can be put INTO the bucket from the batteries in using HSS, and the batteries are still the same old batteries in HSS. Whether you fire conventional flash at full power, or you fire in HSS mode, the size of the supply to the hose is unchanged....SAME total quantity of water into the bucket thru the hose before the supply to the hose is drained...same total number of flashes.
If you have sufficient power in batteries to get thru a shoot at full power, you will not reduce the number of shots by using HSS instead of conventional full power.

A new battery pack can do two things...
  • The supply to the hose gets larger, with increased total milliamps contained within the batteries
  • The hose itself gets larger in diameter, decreasing the filling time of the bucket (shorter recycle)

You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
110yd
Senior Member
790 posts
Likes: 35
Joined Jan 2005
     
Oct 27, 2013 11:25 |  #10

Very good analogy Wilt...

110yd




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
windpig
Chopped liver
Avatar
15,924 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 2268
Joined Dec 2008
Location: Just South of Ballard
     
Oct 27, 2013 12:07 |  #11

110yd wrote in post #16402983 (external link)
Very good analogy Wilt...

110yd

Yup, most excellent.

BTW, howz fishin'?


Would you like to buy a vowel?
Go ahead, spin the wheel.
flickr (external link)
I'm accross the canal just south of Ballard, the town Seattle usurped in 1907.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,551 views & 0 likes for this thread, 8 members have posted to it.
HSS and power consumption
FORUMS General Gear Talk Flash and Studio Lighting 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Frankie Frankenberry
1830 guests, 143 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.