I do that. On the guys portrait in particular (women's look awesome) we took a few poses, me showing him and getting approval with each one, which he and his female partners liked (viewing on the camera). I showed him the best of them via online gallery, but a few I left out. Personally his body posture overall the whole time was very unconfident and "slouchy" and my husband picked up on it big time the day of. The fact that he thinks he looks too stern is a bit odd to me. But in a few of the pic the way he stood my husb felt he looked unconfident and like he had to go to the bathroom. So I didn't put those up, but they are up now b/c he asked! I did delete a lot of them up front, but I save a few in case I need them for something.
So if you delete all the duplicates then you are showing them 1 proof of each pose correct?
I try to not use the term "pose" because the person could be standing (posing) the same way but I might compose the shot in various ways. Those various compositions are kept if I like them but I delete ALL identicals and technical flubs.
So yes, one proof of each "pose" if you define it as a composition rather than body posture. Everything else is deleted before I export them from Lightroom so I can rename the raw files sequentially.
I have no problems deleting bad posture photos or anything simply not good, although if they look THAT bad I'll see it in my viewfinder and won't even take the photo. I also have no problems telling people they looked terrible in those shots. I have a rapport with my clients in which I'm saying these things during the shoot though too; "yeah that was lame let's do it again" and "more GQ, less pissed." So really I know what's bad immediately, stop, give them a little more instruction/explanation/detail to try again right then and there. The whole point is to make them look good.
My proof rate is about 90% of all photos taken unless we're going highly experimental (eg you don't get many keepers when they're doing a catwalk into a specific location due to lighting setups). The selection is then a matter of taste.


