Some from tonight's game, shot with 7D and Sigma 100-300/4 combo. C&C welcome and appreciated! 
#1
#2
#3
#4
joeblack2022 Goldmember 3,005 posts Likes: 5 Joined Sep 2011 Location: The Great White North More info | Oct 30, 2013 23:34 | #1 Some from tonight's game, shot with 7D and Sigma 100-300/4 combo. C&C welcome and appreciated! #2 #3 #4 Joel
LOG IN TO REPLY |
canons900 Goldmember 1,053 posts Likes: 3 Joined Jun 2008 More info | Oct 31, 2013 13:14 | #2 I have this lens and I love it. I like the look of these. I wish this game had been on cable last night.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Oct 31, 2013 22:09 | #3 It's been 22 hours without comment so here goes: Dave
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Voaky999 Goldmember More info | Nov 01, 2013 12:15 | #4 Hi Joel, have to agree with ChunkyDa, these aren't your best. I saw highlights on TV, looks like the photogs were kept quite aways back and behind some rather tall advertising structures. Probably was harder to get good angles. Don
LOG IN TO REPLY |
joeblack2022 THREAD STARTER Goldmember 3,005 posts Likes: 5 Joined Sep 2011 Location: The Great White North More info | Nov 01, 2013 12:50 | #5 canons900 wrote in post #16413832 I have this lens and I love it. I like the look of these. I wish this game had been on cable last night. It was only a webcast. So disappointing that US soccer is so hard to find televised. It was a good game, the South Koreans came to play and the Canadians were napping for a good part of the first half but their keeper kept them in the game. The score was 3-0 for the Canadians but it sure did not reflect the play on the field. ChunkyDA wrote in post #16415044 It's been 22 hours without comment so here goes: #1 looks soft #2 I'm curious why the feet look blurrier than faces. Is this the entire image or cropped. Is the lens soft in the corners? #3 While interesting that you have an apparent goal, this is a missed shot. Focus is on the #6 player who has taken a tumble. Who took the shot? What's the story? Everyone is a spectator. #4 is a bit of a blurry mess. While this one shows physical interaction it is not all that good. Shutter should have been faster, is this about 1/500 or 1/640? Except for #2 the rest have a bit of a green hue Voaky999 wrote in post #16416213 Hi Joel, have to agree with ChunkyDa, these aren't your best. I saw highlights on TV, looks like the photogs were kept quite aways back and behind some rather tall advertising structures. Probably was harder to get good angles. Thanks for the feedback guys, I must admit it was not my best outing and I think I made a mistake in opting for reach over a faster lens (brought the 100-300/4 vs the 70-200/2.8). Shutter was around 1/640-1/800 and I had the ISO cranked on the 7D. I must be in summer mode still, expecting some daylight at 7pm now is quite foolish. Joel
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Niagara Wedding Photographer 1320 guests, 119 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||