Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 04 Nov 2013 (Monday) 09:38
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Computer for processing RAW files

 
DigitalDon
Senior Member
540 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 32
Joined Aug 2012
Location: USA
     
Nov 04, 2013 09:38 |  #1

My laptop is over 6 years old and my desktop has it beat by a few more years, the laptop is about to go out on me so I need to be looking for a new one.
The big box stores have computers anywhere for five hundred to eight hundred dollars, I'm thinking to get a computer powerfull enough for processing pictures will cost a hole lot more than the computers in the big box stores.

I was at Staples asking a guy that worked there about the computers they had, he asked me what I wanted to use it for and I said to process pictures, he said what I needed was one with a fast processor (reading suggests a quad processor) he said the computers with HD should handle the picture quality that I would need. I am between a rock and a hard place trying to figure out will it be a desktop or laptop, I have got so use to my laptop but I don't think it would be as good as a desktop for processing photos (larger moniter) etc.
Please help with suggestions on what I should go with desktop or laptop and what other things like usb ports should the computer have. AND is a HD (high def) computer going to give me the best image quality that I can get when processing RAW files?
Thanks



(EOS RebelT3i EF-S 18 - 55 IS II Kit) (EFS 55 - 250 mm lense f/4-5.6 IS II) (YONGNUO YN 565EX flash)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lowner
"I'm the original idiot"
Avatar
12,924 posts
Likes: 18
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Salisbury, UK.
     
Nov 04, 2013 09:42 |  #2

I've not had any problem with a bog standard computer and monitor. Yes, it will need calibrating and the brightness level reduced with something like the Eye-one display 2 or similar, but that's all.

Sounds like someone either does not know, or is trying to extract more cash from you.


Richard

http://rcb4344.zenfoli​o.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DigitalDon
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
540 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 32
Joined Aug 2012
Location: USA
     
Nov 04, 2013 09:54 |  #3

Lowner wrote in post #16423321 (external link)
I've not had any problem with a bog standard computer and monitor. Yes, it will need calibrating and the brightness level reduced with something like the Eye-one display 2 or similar, but that's all.

Sounds like someone either does not know, or is trying to extract more cash from you.

Thanks Lowner
I was thinking my laptop being over 6 years old that maybe I am not getting the full advantage of Lightroom 4 when it comes to processing pictures, I have the Spyder4 calibrator.



(EOS RebelT3i EF-S 18 - 55 IS II Kit) (EFS 55 - 250 mm lense f/4-5.6 IS II) (YONGNUO YN 565EX flash)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Kolor-Pikker
Goldmember
2,790 posts
Likes: 59
Joined Aug 2009
Location: Moscow
     
Nov 04, 2013 09:59 |  #4

Unless you are going to be stitching panos, it doesn't take much power to process photos, my ancient Pentium 4 workstation was just fine until I also needed to start doing other things with it. An SSD would be a good addition though, it'll speed things up more than a faster processor will, especially in Lightroom.

Any monitor is fine so long as it's S-IPS or other IPS variant, you don't want color shifts or poor contrast as you would get with TN or VA panels.


5DmkII | 24-70 f/2.8L II | Pentax 645Z | 55/2.8 SDM | 120/4 Macro | 150/2.8 IF
I acquired an expensive camera so I can hang out in forums, annoy wedding photographers during formals and look down on P&S users... all the while telling people it's the photographer, not the camera.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Aki78
Senior Member
Avatar
963 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 34
Joined Jun 2006
Location: New Hampshire USA
     
Nov 04, 2013 13:29 |  #5

I guess this is a subject of how much you're willing to spend? I agree on SSD's and lots of memory for one. Storage is where you can go with regular ol' HDD's.

I have a three year old Dell with i7 processor and 8GB of RAM but with regular HDD. It's good but does slow down when I'm opening multiple RAW's in CS5 or even LR4. I know my HDD is the culprit...because I had to throw in an emergency old drive that doesn't have a lot of cache. I'm looking Samsung Pro series SSD's next.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mike_d
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,690 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 1074
Joined Aug 2009
     
Nov 04, 2013 15:53 |  #6

I use Lightroom 4 and shoot raw files with a 5D3. The most time consuming task is rendering previews which is very CPU intensive. Get the fastest CPU you can afford. I have a second generation Core i7 @ 3.4GHz, my LR catalog and cache lives on an SSD, and rendering previews still takes longer than I'd like. Desktop CPUs are faster than laptop CPUs are are less likely to overheat the machine when its cranking through a few hundred images.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 570
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
Nov 04, 2013 19:48 |  #7

Buy what you can afford...

I'd advise against a laptop for your "main" photo processing machine because, at least with the "economy" laptops, the monitor will be very bad for photos.

I did spend a fair amount of money ($2k) for the parts to build my own workstation, but I specifically went for a high-quality photo processing machine. You could do with less, although I wouldn't look at spending less than, say, $1k...

As to ports, the faster the better, now there is USB3 and Firewire 800, I'd stick to those for your ports and all your devices (you can plug in older devices, it's all "backward compatible", but still spend a bit extra...)

Disk drives...you need an extra internal drive for your library and data, and that could be an SSD drive if you want to spend the money, then I'd advise an external drive for long-term storage and then another as a back-up drive...

Get as much RAM as you can (I'd suggest 8GB minimum for decent Raw processing).

And so on and so on, yada yada yada!


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DigitalDon
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
540 posts
Gallery: 2 photos
Likes: 32
Joined Aug 2012
Location: USA
     
Nov 05, 2013 09:40 as a reply to  @ tonylong's post |  #8

I would like to say thanks to all of you for your help, I know a guy that can build one, he use to charge around fifteen hundred, think I will give him a call.
Thanks again



(EOS RebelT3i EF-S 18 - 55 IS II Kit) (EFS 55 - 250 mm lense f/4-5.6 IS II) (YONGNUO YN 565EX flash)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

1,569 views & 0 likes for this thread, 6 members have posted to it.
Computer for processing RAW files
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is vinceisvisual
1240 guests, 171 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.