Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
Thread started 06 Nov 2013 (Wednesday) 20:30
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

On the fly Team Photo

 
hairy_moth
Goldmember
Avatar
3,739 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 19
Joined Apr 2009
Location: NJ
     
Nov 06, 2013 20:30 |  #1

What could I have done better?
After, what turned out to be, the last game of the season, one of my son’s football coaches asked if I could take a team photo (he missed the official team photo and wanted one with him in it). The problems:

  • Bright sunny day, about 2 to 3 hours before sunset (I just noticed that the time in my camera is off).
  • The kids were spent and didn’t want to do this. They just lost to a bigger stronger team and thus didn’t make the playoffs.
  • Not all the coaches wanted to do this: “Okay, but let’s make this quick” was said.
They were out in the middle of the field, I didn’t have time to look for a suitable location and they didn’t want to move. So I lined them up with their back to the sun, goalpost and flag in the background.

All I had with me was: 7D, 17-55, 70-200 and a 2x converter. I put the 17-55 on and had a go. The sun turned out to be even worse than I thought; the first few shots were unusable because of flare. Knowing that I could crop off the top 1/3 of the frame, I used my hand as a hood extender and took a few more shots. I’m still not happy with the results, I’m just wondering how others would have handled this?

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2013/11/1/LQ_667363.jpg
Image hosted by forum (667363) © hairy_moth [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.

IMAGE: https://photography-on-the.net/forum/images/hostedphotos_lq/2013/11/1/LQ_667364.jpg
Image hosted by forum (667364) © hairy_moth [SHARE LINK]
THIS IS A LOW QUALITY PREVIEW. Please log in to see the good quality stuff.


IMG NOTICE: [NOT AN IMAGE URL, NOT RENDERED INLINE]

7D | 300D | G1X | Tokina 11-16mm f/2.8 | EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 | EF-S 60mm f/2.8 Macro | EF 85mm f/1.8 | 70-200 f/2.8L MkII -- flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
EightEleven
Car enthusiast and an all around nice guy
1,676 posts
Gallery: 6 photos
Likes: 143
Joined Nov 2012
Location: Northeast Georgia
     
Nov 06, 2013 20:50 |  #2

Looks like plentiful shade over by bleachers? I would have tried that.


Ron Snarski
flickr (external link)
C&C always welcome!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Dazmward
Hatchling
4 posts
Joined Mar 2010
     
Nov 07, 2013 06:46 as a reply to  @ EightEleven's post |  #3

Shooting with the harsh sunlight from behind them was the mistake. It would have been a good idea to have switched positions, although I can't comment on what the background was like.
Prob best shoot in raw too - gives you a chance to 'rescue' a better shot.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
hairy_moth
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
3,739 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 19
Joined Apr 2009
Location: NJ
     
Nov 07, 2013 08:05 |  #4

The light was so harsh that, if they were facing any other direction, there would have been harsh shadows all over their faces; facing the sun, they all would have been squinting and there still would have been hash shadows on the faces. This way, at least, the light on the faces is consistently in the shadow of their heads, though some have stage halos around their hair and side of their face.

If I had a flash, I would have used it for better contrast and fill light.

The bleachers were not an option, there was just a small corner that was in the shade and I would have been shooting up at them from the ground. It looks like they are in the shade, I think, because all you can see is the front side of the seats; but notice the tree right there, it is completely lit (front back and sides). If the bleachers were actually in the shade of the large building (as they appear to be) so would the bottom of that tree.

The conditions stunk. One mistake (I think) I made was shooting with a very short focal length (20mm). I suspect that if I had stepped back and shot at 55, or even gone further back and used the 70-200, I might have been able to get less sky and sun in the frame and thus less flare.

The shot was further complicated by the wide range of skin tones. My primary goal was to get the faces right.


7D | 300D | G1X | Tokina 11-16mm f/2.8 | EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 | EF-S 60mm f/2.8 Macro | EF 85mm f/1.8 | 70-200 f/2.8L MkII -- flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
chocolatekara
Senior Member
286 posts
Likes: 10
Joined Oct 2013
Location: Adelaide, South Australia
     
Nov 07, 2013 18:25 |  #5

Considering what you were working with... good job on getting ALL THE FACES IN and nobody hiding behind someone!
Sounds like a highly stressful situation, and a good question to get people thinking!
btw, I got nothing haha


_______________
6D - 60D - Canon 135mm 2L - Sigma 50mm F1.4 - Sigma 17-50mm F2.8 - Speedlite 600EX-RT

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
paul-t
Goldmember
1,871 posts
Joined Oct 2007
Location: The deep south, that's the deep south of England.
     
Nov 08, 2013 11:11 |  #6

One way to stop people squinting is to get all of them to shut there eyes and open them on the count of say 3. You may have to do this a couple of times. Hope this helps.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
hairy_moth
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
3,739 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 19
Joined Apr 2009
Location: NJ
     
Dec 09, 2013 09:30 |  #7

While browsing Tim's site (external link) (Tim is one one of the excellent wedding photographers that frequents POTN -- most often found in the Wedding and Events section) I found my answer:

Here is a link to a shot from Tim's page where he shot a really nice group shot in similar lighting!
http://www.wildphotogr​aphy.co.nz …st-959/full/c40-LM212.jpg (external link)

I should have positioned myself up in the stands, the team on the field, back to the sun, and shot down on the team. That would have taken the sun out and away from the frame while keeping the players backs to the sun (so their faces are squint free and are in consistent light, in the shadow of their heads).


7D | 300D | G1X | Tokina 11-16mm f/2.8 | EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 | EF-S 60mm f/2.8 Macro | EF 85mm f/1.8 | 70-200 f/2.8L MkII -- flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
HiepBuiPhotography
Goldmember
1,612 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2012
Location: Harrisburg, PA
     
Dec 09, 2013 09:42 |  #8

I don't think having everyone looking up at the camera while you're elevated works for a team photo.


Hiep Bui Photography | Harrisburg Wedding Photographer (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
HiepBuiPhotography
Goldmember
1,612 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Mar 2012
Location: Harrisburg, PA
     
Dec 09, 2013 09:46 |  #9

I think your third photo is fine. I wouldn't cut the coach's arm on the left off. I would go back in there and increase the exposure locally on the individual faces. Besides that, it is what it is. It seems acceptable as in with the conditions and gear you had.


Hiep Bui Photography | Harrisburg Wedding Photographer (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
hairy_moth
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
3,739 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 19
Joined Apr 2009
Location: NJ
     
Dec 09, 2013 09:49 |  #10

HiepBuiPhotography wrote in post #16513193 (external link)
I don't think having everyone looking up at the camera while you're elevated works for a team photo.

I agree.. but what I did also didn't work. Considering the situation, I believe that would have been my best option, but I posted this, originally, because I was wondering what others would have done to get a better shot.

Considering the situation, there was not 'good' show, show I was wondering what better options there might have been. There was usable shade within distance that this group would have been willing to move to. They would have walked 20' toward the stands while I got up about 10 rows.


7D | 300D | G1X | Tokina 11-16mm f/2.8 | EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 | EF-S 60mm f/2.8 Macro | EF 85mm f/1.8 | 70-200 f/2.8L MkII -- flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
Avatar
51,010 posts
Likes: 375
Joined Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
     
Dec 09, 2013 20:47 |  #11

You need some studio strobes with powerable power packs. I don't remember what I used for my shot, but I suspect it was on camera flash and photoshop. Ideally I'd have had 1-2 big strobes with me, but that shot is from a roof.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
agl99
Member
156 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Apr 2013
     
Dec 12, 2013 02:14 as a reply to  @ tim's post |  #12

I think given the limitations you did the right thing in shot 2 by realizing you had an issue and you corrected it with your hand. ...but, the main issue is not expressing enough confidence to direct the team and coaches to move to a slightly better location. I had a very similar experience this summer and I could see the light was not right and had to instruct the team to reposition itself after they were mostly ready...you get groans, but laugh and joke about it a bit and it can work out better as everyone relaxes a bit...you have to be really quick though and you only have one chance to fix it. It is not easy, but people will understand if its not going to work one way...they still want to look good.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,673 views & 0 likes for this thread, 8 members have posted to it.
On the fly Team Photo
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Discussion Critique Corner 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is semonsters
910 guests, 122 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.