Well after reading these threads for the last couple of months, and finding myself way short on focal length this weekend on a birding trip, I put my order in last night. Hopefully my tax refund gets here before the lens ships...
Feb 10, 2014 15:27 | #3286 Well after reading these threads for the last couple of months, and finding myself way short on focal length this weekend on a birding trip, I put my order in last night. Hopefully my tax refund gets here before the lens ships... Gripped 7D, gripped, full-spectrum modfied T1i (500D), SX50HS, A2E film body, Tamzooka (150-600), Tamron 90mm/2.8 VC (ver 2), Tamron 18-270 VC, Canon FD 100 f/4.0 macro, Canon 24-105 f/4L,Canon EF 200 f/2.8LII, Canon 85 f/1.8, Tamron Adaptall 2 90mmf/2.5 Macro, Tokina 11-16, Canon EX-430 flash, Vivitar DF-383 flash, Astro-Tech AT6RC and Celestron NexStar 102 GT telescopes, various other semi-crappy manual lenses and stuff.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Grizz Cream of the Crop More info | Feb 10, 2014 15:29 | #3287 archer1960 wrote in post #16679208 Well after reading these threads for the last couple of months, and finding myself way short on focal length this weekend on a birding trip, I put my order in last night. Hopefully my tax refund gets here before the lens ships... Congrats! Craig * Canon 7D Mark II * 60D * 10D * Tamron SP 150-600 f/5-6.3 Di VC USD * EF 400 5.6L USM * EF 17-40 4.0L USM * EF 70-210 4.0 * EF 28 2.8 * EF 50 1.8 MK1*Flickr
LOG IN TO REPLY |
lescrane Member 85 posts Likes: 1 Joined Jan 2014 More info | Feb 10, 2014 15:57 | #3288 guruofall wrote in post #16678881 I got a chance to feel this lens at my local store. Boise being not a big town we have only one camera store that I know of. The sales rep there was nice person and allowed me to take few shots with this lens. To my surprise, this lens is HEAVY. I tried my friends 100-400 L before but this felt heavier that that. I would definitely need Monopod or Tripod to hold this steady. Also, the zoom ring is long as other people have pointed out. on my other lens, I can zoom from wide to tele in one rotation of hand. If I get this it would be steep learning curve to get used to all these unfamiliar features.I personally cannot handhold the Tamron at all, whereas, while I used the 100-400 on a monopod I could get away with taking it off for more freedom of movement I do have very bad back and neck issues. So for me the Tamron might as well be the 10lb 600 4.0L(but a lot cheaper)...learn to use tripod or monopod all the time.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
JohnSheehy Goldmember 4,542 posts Likes: 1215 Joined Jan 2010 More info | Feb 10, 2014 17:09 | #3289 Kickflipkid687 wrote in post #16679016 Yeah, it's noticeably heavier than the 100-400, but I don't personally find the weight that bad at all. If you are trying to hand hold it for like 10-15 minutes straight, it might get shaky. I noticed right away that it was heavier than the 100-400, but I got used to that pretty quick (I don't find the 100-400 to be too heavy to begin with). It does feel a bit more unwieldy, however, when manually focusing, since the focus ring is so close to the body.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Illume Member 149 posts Likes: 2 Joined Oct 2012 Location: Virginia More info | Feb 10, 2014 17:47 | #3290 I had a strange thing happen with my Tamron yesterday. I was taking images of a bird on a tree branch and while firing a "burst," I noticed the images from the beginning of the burst were fine, but then subsequent shots were extremely overexposed. I thought this was odd, since I had already set my exposure/settings for this particular spot, and the lighting hadn't changed. I checked my settings (unchanged) and took a few more shots --- same thing, very overexposed. I turned the camera off, then back on and everything was normal. I'm wondering if something was up with the aperture blades...? It was fairly cold (20s) outside, and I'd been out for quite a while when this occurred. I shot with the lens for the remainder of the day without any further issues. Canon 6D | Sigma 35 1.4 | 40mm pancake | 16-35 f/4 | 24-105L | 100L 2/8 | Tamron 150-600 VC
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 10, 2014 18:02 | #3291 jaspa wrote in post #16678752 I apologize if this has been covered recently, but is there any word on Amazon availability in the future?? I spoke with a customer service rep. yesterday and she was unable to provide any information regarding the availability of the lens. Facebook
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 10, 2014 18:09 | #3292 Illume wrote in post #16679492 I had a strange thing happen with my Tamron yesterday. I was taking images of a bird on a tree branch and while firing a "burst," I noticed the images from the beginning of the burst were fine, but then subsequent shots were extremely overexposed. I thought this was odd, since I had already set my exposure/settings for this particular spot, and the lighting hadn't changed. I checked my settings (unchanged) and took a few more shots --- same thing, very overexposed. I turned the camera off, then back on and everything was normal. I'm wondering if something was up with the aperture blades...? It was fairly cold (20s) outside, and I'd been out for quite a while when this occurred. I shot with the lens for the remainder of the day without any further issues. One of the reviewers at B&H says the same.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
LVMoose Moose gets blamed for everything. More info | Feb 10, 2014 18:15 | #3293 rndman wrote in post #16679547 One of the reviewers at B&H says the same. .....I thought it performed well until it started to over expose my images for 1 1/2 to 3 stops. ..... Yeah, see posts 3237, 3238. That review (2 star) was referred to. I thought that may have been stuck blades, too. Moose
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Illume Member 149 posts Likes: 2 Joined Oct 2012 Location: Virginia More info | Feb 10, 2014 18:22 | #3294 rndman wrote in post #16679547 One of the reviewers at B&H says the same. .....I thought it performed well until it started to over expose my images for 1 1/2 to 3 stops. ..... Thanks. I'll have to monitor this issue -- hopefully it won't return. Otherwise I've been very satisfied with the performance of the lens. Canon 6D | Sigma 35 1.4 | 40mm pancake | 16-35 f/4 | 24-105L | 100L 2/8 | Tamron 150-600 VC
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 10, 2014 18:24 | #3295 LV Moose wrote in post #16679562 Yeah, see posts 3237, 3238. That review (2 star) was referred to. I thought that may have been stuck blades, too. Yup. That was me wondering how a lens could overexpose..
LOG IN TO REPLY |
LVMoose Moose gets blamed for everything. More info | Feb 10, 2014 18:25 | #3296 rndman wrote in post #16679584 Yup. That was me wondering how a lens could overexpose.. I wonder what would cause the stuck blades. Did Nikon sold their (sticky) oil stock (used in D600) to Tamron..? (And funded D610 manufacturing cost from it?)![]() Oh. Sorry. Moose
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 10, 2014 18:43 | #3297 I get stuck blades once in a blue moon with the tamron 70-300 Sony A7siii/A7iv/ZV-1 - FE 24/1.4 - SY 24/2.8 - FE 35/2.8 - FE 50/1.8 - FE 85/1.8 - F 600/5.6 - CZ 100-300 - Tamron 17-28/2.8 - 28-75/2.8 - 28-200 RXD
LOG IN TO REPLY |
palmor Senior Member More info | Feb 10, 2014 19:53 | #3298 Illume wrote in post #16679492 I had a strange thing happen with my Tamron yesterday. I was taking images of a bird on a tree branch and while firing a "burst," I noticed the images from the beginning of the burst were fine, but then subsequent shots were extremely overexposed. I thought this was odd, since I had already set my exposure/settings for this particular spot, and the lighting hadn't changed. I checked my settings (unchanged) and took a few more shots --- same thing, very overexposed. I turned the camera off, then back on and everything was normal. I'm wondering if something was up with the aperture blades...? It was fairly cold (20s) outside, and I'd been out for quite a while when this occurred. I shot with the lens for the remainder of the day without any further issues. I was out in similar temps last weekend and saw no such issues. Hopefully it was a one time event for you! John
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Feb 10, 2014 22:08 | #3299 bimhoff07 wrote in post #16679530 I spoke with a customer service rep. yesterday and she was unable to provide any information regarding the availability of the lens. Dang, thanks for the info though! - Jason -
LOG IN TO REPLY |
hoodlum Member 142 posts Likes: 8 Joined Aug 2013 Location: Markham, ON Canada More info | Feb 10, 2014 22:17 | #3300 I found this field report on the lens.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is Thunderstream 1871 guests, 105 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||