Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
Thread started 07 Nov 2013 (Thursday) 09:38
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Tamron developing 150-600mm VC USD lens

 
archer1960
Goldmember
Avatar
4,932 posts
Gallery: 6 photos
Likes: 82
Joined Jul 2010
     
Jan 05, 2014 08:44 |  #1216

fivedmarkone wrote in post #16579087 (external link)
This lens may become very good choice for not-rich people but want to take birding and wildlife photographs?

I'm sure that's what Tamron is hoping. The Sigma 50-500 is the current king of that market, but the Tamron is less expensive and longer, so if the IQ is the same, I'm sure it will kill Sigma's market.


Gripped 7D, gripped, full-spectrum modfied T1i (500D), SX50HS, A2E film body, Tamzooka (150-600), Tamron 90mm/2.8 VC (ver 2), Tamron 18-270 VC, Canon FD 100 f/4.0 macro, Canon 24-105 f/4L,Canon EF 200 f/2.8LII, Canon 85 f/1.8, Tamron Adaptall 2 90mmf/2.5 Macro, Tokina 11-16, Canon EX-430 flash, Vivitar DF-383 flash, Astro-Tech AT6RC and Celestron NexStar 102 GT telescopes, various other semi-crappy manual lenses and stuff.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
John ­ Sheehy
Goldmember
4,542 posts
Likes: 1215
Joined Jan 2010
     
Jan 05, 2014 09:07 |  #1217

hksfrank wrote in post #16576005 (external link)
sure it does do AF , and body will show correct EXIF as 6.3 ( not sure how they fake the body to made body think the max aperture may be a 5.6 )

Does it show as f/6.3 in both the EXIF in the files, and the LCD also?

using with 600D no problem and i even can put a kenko 1.4 on it. although this time it cannot report correct exif (still F6.3 at tele) , but af are working.

Which Kenko 1.4? There are a few different Kenko 1.4 TC, with 3 different modes of operation: non-reporting, reporting (Pro 300 DG), and reporting with tricking (Pro 300 DGX).




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
John ­ Sheehy
Goldmember
4,542 posts
Likes: 1215
Joined Jan 2010
     
Jan 05, 2014 09:12 |  #1218

Draco3D wrote in post #16576921 (external link)
Af test on 7D
http://www.youtube.com​/watch?v=I6BXbjSywY4 (external link)
It's struggling on 600mm,probably because 6.3 is not enough for the side AF point.Im sure i will use only center on 550D :).Maybe MF first,then AF.

There are other AF points besides the one in the center? ;)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DAA
Senior Member
Avatar
315 posts
Likes: 23
Joined May 2011
Location: Utah
     
Jan 05, 2014 09:28 |  #1219

kdrk888 wrote in post #16578833 (external link)
The center at 600mm is sharper than the Sigma 50-500 at 500mm.

That is all the IQ I'm hoping for, at this price and length. Especially since I'll actually be comparing to the 150-500, which seems generally to be considered a bit inferior to the 50-500.

Can't wait to get one in my hands!

- DAA




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Grizz
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,500 posts
Gallery: 321 photos
Best ofs: 3
Likes: 3401
Joined Mar 2006
Location: Waldwick, NJ USA
     
Jan 05, 2014 09:29 |  #1220

I pre-ordered one from B&H. The proof will be in the pudding as they say. Looking forward to trying it out just for the fun of it. :)


Craig * Canon 7D Mark II * 60D * 10D * Tamron SP 150-600 f/5-6.3 Di VC USD * EF 400 5.6L USM * EF 17-40 4.0L USM * EF 70-210 4.0 * EF 28 2.8 * EF 50 1.8 MK1*Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
fivedmarkone
Member
75 posts
Joined Jan 2014
     
Jan 05, 2014 09:35 |  #1221
bannedPermanent ban

archer1960 wrote in post #16579112 (external link)
I'm sure that's what Tamron is hoping. The Sigma 50-500 is the current king of that market, but the Tamron is less expensive and longer, so if the IQ is the same, I'm sure it will kill Sigma's market.

Same? The-digital-picture.com's test of Sigma 150-500mm looks terrible http://www.the-digital-picture.com …omp=0&FLIComp=0​&APIComp=0 (external link)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
John ­ Sheehy
Goldmember
4,542 posts
Likes: 1215
Joined Jan 2010
     
Jan 05, 2014 09:45 |  #1222

fivedmarkone wrote in post #16579087 (external link)
This lens may become very good choice for not-rich people but want to take birding and wildlife photographs?

A good choice for people who can afford the big whites but don't want to carry them around, as well, or don't think that they are worth what they cost, even if they are the best, optically (not an issue if you resell them, but an issue if you keep them).




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
archer1960
Goldmember
Avatar
4,932 posts
Gallery: 6 photos
Likes: 82
Joined Jul 2010
     
Jan 05, 2014 09:52 |  #1223

fivedmarkone wrote in post #16579209 (external link)
Same? The-digital-picture.com's test of Sigma 150-500mm looks terrible http://www.the-digital-picture.com …omp=0&FLIComp=0​&APIComp=0 (external link)

I said 50-500, not 150-500. The 50-500 is better.


Gripped 7D, gripped, full-spectrum modfied T1i (500D), SX50HS, A2E film body, Tamzooka (150-600), Tamron 90mm/2.8 VC (ver 2), Tamron 18-270 VC, Canon FD 100 f/4.0 macro, Canon 24-105 f/4L,Canon EF 200 f/2.8LII, Canon 85 f/1.8, Tamron Adaptall 2 90mmf/2.5 Macro, Tokina 11-16, Canon EX-430 flash, Vivitar DF-383 flash, Astro-Tech AT6RC and Celestron NexStar 102 GT telescopes, various other semi-crappy manual lenses and stuff.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gabebalazs
Bird Whisperer
Avatar
7,643 posts
Gallery: 52 photos
Likes: 1070
Joined Nov 2008
Location: Toledo, OH
     
Jan 05, 2014 09:52 |  #1224

Yeah, I'm also interested in this lens as a lighter backup for my Sigma 120-300 2.8 OS + TC. Little over half the weight.


SONY A7RIII | SONY A7III | SONY RX10 IV | SONY RX100 | 24-70 2.8 GM | 70-200 2.8 GM | 16-35 F/4 | PZ 18-105 F/4 | FE 85 1.8 | FE 28-70 | SIGMA 35 1.4 ART | SIGMA 150-600 C | ROKINON 14 2.8
Gabe Balazs Photo (external link)
Nature Shots Portfolio (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DreDaze
THREAD ­ STARTER
happy with myself for not saying anything stupid
Avatar
18,407 posts
Gallery: 49 photos
Likes: 3433
Joined Mar 2006
Location: S.F. Bay Area
     
Jan 05, 2014 10:12 |  #1225

archer1960 wrote in post #16579112 (external link)
I'm sure that's what Tamron is hoping. The Sigma 50-500 is the current king of that market, but the Tamron is less expensive and longer, so if the IQ is the same, I'm sure it will kill Sigma's market.

except it's not really cheap...it's pretty much the same price as the 100-400L...so i'd say the 150-500OS is actually the current king of cheap long telephotos...

fivedmarkone wrote in post #16579209 (external link)
Same? The-digital-picture.com's test of Sigma 150-500mm looks terrible http://www.the-digital-picture.com …omp=0&FLIComp=0​&APIComp=0 (external link)

the center doesn't look too bad...and honestly where that last crop is in the frame doesn't matter to me at all...i've got some shots at 500mm f8 that end up being pretty good...i'm not sure if i'd want a 5D classic with this lens for wildlife though...i think i'd rather have a crop body


Andre or Dre
gear list
Instagram (external link)
flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kdrk888
Senior Member
Avatar
404 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Mar 2010
Location: Maryland, USA
     
Jan 05, 2014 10:20 |  #1226

kdrk888 wrote in post #16578833 (external link)
Basically they were saying the VC and motor are quiet. The center at 600mm is sharper than the Sigma 50-500 at 500mm.

My apology, they said the Tammy's center at 600mm is better the the Sigma's 150-500mm at 500mm, NOT the Sigma 50-500mm as I posted earlier. My bad.


Douglas
Canon, Nikon, Sony. Too many gears, too little time.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kdrk888
Senior Member
Avatar
404 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Mar 2010
Location: Maryland, USA
     
Jan 05, 2014 10:27 |  #1227

Check out https://www.facebook.c​om/TamronPhotoClub (external link).

They posted the newer 100% cropped pictures in the last couple hours. You don't really need to understand what was written. The pictures speak for themselves. The Tamron Club in Hong Kong organized an outing for testing the lens.


Douglas
Canon, Nikon, Sony. Too many gears, too little time.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Talley
Talley Whacker
Avatar
11,091 posts
Gallery: 46 photos
Likes: 2795
Joined Dec 2011
Location: Houston
     
Jan 05, 2014 10:33 |  #1228

kdrk888 wrote in post #16579359 (external link)
Check out https://www.facebook.c​om/TamronPhotoClub (external link).

They posted the newer 100% cropped pictures in the last couple hours. You don't really need to understand what was written. The pictures speak for themselves. The Tamron Club in Hong Kong organized an outing for testing the lens.

Not bad at all. Sure it's not pixel sharp SOOC but with some PP will turn out to be a real winner. Nice budget 600mm zoom.

I believe it's a winner for it's intended market!


A7rIII | A7III | 12-24 F4 | 16-35 GM | 28-75 2.8 | 100-400 GM | 12mm 2.8 Fisheye | 35mm 2.8 | 85mm 1.8 | 35A | 85A | 200mm L F2 IS | MC-11
My Gear Archive

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Talley
Talley Whacker
Avatar
11,091 posts
Gallery: 46 photos
Likes: 2795
Joined Dec 2011
Location: Houston
     
Jan 05, 2014 10:33 |  #1229

gabebalazs wrote in post #16579261 (external link)
Yeah, I'm also interested in this lens as a lighter backup for my Sigma 120-300 2.8 OS + TC. Little over half the weight.

We hit up the zoo about 20 times a year. This will be the perfect lens for my trips.


A7rIII | A7III | 12-24 F4 | 16-35 GM | 28-75 2.8 | 100-400 GM | 12mm 2.8 Fisheye | 35mm 2.8 | 85mm 1.8 | 35A | 85A | 200mm L F2 IS | MC-11
My Gear Archive

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DAA
Senior Member
Avatar
315 posts
Likes: 23
Joined May 2011
Location: Utah
     
Jan 05, 2014 11:22 |  #1230

DreDaze wrote in post #16579326 (external link)
except it's not really cheap...it's pretty much the same price as the 100-400L...so i'd say the 150-500OS is actually the current king of cheap long telephotos...


Agreed. Depends on a persons budget, obviously, but the 50-500 was what I really wanted, but could not afford. So I've been using the 150-500, because that was within my budget. The price of the new Tamron is exactly what I paid for my 150-500 new a couple of years ago.

I've been pretty happy with the 150-500 too, I might add. Might be terrible IQ to some, but I've captured plenty of images with it that have made me happy.

Hopefully, it won't be more than a few more weeks before I have the Tamron to compare with.

- DAA




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

790,095 views & 5 likes for this thread, 303 members have posted to it and it is followed by 8 members.
Tamron developing 150-600mm VC USD lens
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Thunderstream
1737 guests, 110 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.