Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
Thread started 09 Nov 2013 (Saturday) 00:54
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

Pecpads or Quikstrips for Copper Hill System?

 
Intheswamp
Goldmember
1,061 posts
Gallery: 33 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 291
Joined Sep 2013
Location: South Alabama
     
Nov 09, 2013 00:54 |  #1

I'm trying to figure out what type of lens and sensor cleaning kit to put together. I'm thinking of the basic kit from Copper Hill for the sensor. Does anyone have a preference when it comes down to choosing between Quikstrips and Pecpads? Seems the Quikstrips would be easier to use....no folding and supposedly doesn't block your vision as much as the Pecpads do. I would think that the Pecpads, since they're folded over, would be more cushioned. Thoughts, anyone?

Thanks!
Ed


www.beeweather.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
koala ­ yummies
Senior Member
735 posts
Gallery: 33 photos
Likes: 200
Joined Oct 2008
Location: Los Angeles
     
Nov 09, 2013 11:07 |  #2

I have used both and to be totally honest, I prefer the original pec pads. I also prefer the original two-swipe method (there and back) vs the full-sensor-height one-swipe swabs.

The original pec pads are just easier for me to consistently wrap them around the swab. With the quick strips the edges of the strips are close to the edges of the swab and I didn't feel as comfortable using them, nor could I get them on the swabs as consistently. This is just one opinion though. One other reason I prefer the pec pads is they are more universally available, I can get them from Copper Hill, B&H, or local stores like Samys and Calumet, the quick strips I've only seen from Copper Hill.


flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Intheswamp
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
1,061 posts
Gallery: 33 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 291
Joined Sep 2013
Location: South Alabama
     
Nov 09, 2013 17:57 as a reply to  @ koala yummies's post |  #3

Thanks for the reply. What you've said makes sense. I was a bit concerned about the corners/edges of the wand nudging out from within the quikstrips. I haven't ruled out the CH route, but I'm leaning more to swabs. I think I'm beginning to get OCD about this... ;)

Ed


www.beeweather.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tdragone
Goldmember
Avatar
2,188 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Sep 2004
Location: San Diego, California
     
Nov 21, 2013 00:59 |  #4

I still have my original sensor swipe that I bought when I learned about sensor dust on my 300D. 7 or 8 cameras later and I JUST finished my first package of Pec Pads and bought a second package. I too prefer the pec pads over quikstrips. I can cover the sensor on my Mk iv in 2 passes.


-Tom Dragonetti
Spyder Holster + 1Dmk IV, 50D, G11
10-22, 16-35 2.8Lii, , 24-70 2.8Lii, 50mm 1.4,
70-200 2.8Lii IS, 100-400L IS
1.4x TC, 580EX ii, ST-E2

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

1,070 views & 0 likes for this thread
Pecpads or Quikstrips for Copper Hill System?
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is peterohara
587 guests, 397 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.