Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
Thread started 10 Nov 2013 (Sunday) 02:05
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Serious photography..... with a phone.

 
Charlie
THREAD ­ STARTER
Guess What! I'm Pregnant!
16,672 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 6634
Joined Sep 2007
     
Nov 13, 2013 14:15 |  #91

fullyreclined wrote in post #16448704 (external link)
NY Times photographer Ben Lowry uses his iphone as a serious image making tool. He has some amazing photos (external link) from the conflict in Iraq.

this has a lot to do with software and accessibility. There's a reason why the iphone works in this scenario as well (bright sunny days, discreet tool).

his shots are emotionally striking because he has access to that area, where most people would not. it's kinda like the muhammad ali shot over his downed opponent. There are multiple versions, and every one just as good, but that has to do with being at the right place and time.

A ladder is a great climbing tool for a house, terrible for a mountain.


Sony A7siii/A7iv/ZV-1 - FE 24/1.4 - SY 24/2.8 - FE 35/2.8 - FE 50/1.8 - FE 85/1.8 - F 600/5.6 - CZ 100-300 - Tamron 17-28/2.8 - 28-75/2.8 - 28-200 RXD
Panasonic GH6 - Laowa 7.5/2 - PL 15/1.7 - P 42.5/1.8 - OM 75/1.8 - PL 10-25/1.7 - P 12-32 - P 14-140

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nathan
Can you repeat the question, please?
Avatar
7,900 posts
Gallery: 18 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 361
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Boston
     
Nov 13, 2013 14:16 |  #92

Charlie wrote in post #16438834 (external link)
Does photography mean this little now, where formal events can be captured via phone, or are phones just so technologically advance now that they can capture low light events ;)

Her photos don't mean any less to her. The issue here is that her photos don't mean anything to you.


Taking photos with a fancy camera does not make me a photographer.
www.nathantpham.com (external link) | Boston POTN Flickr (external link) |
5D3 x2 | 16-35L II | 50L | 85L II | 100L | 135L | 580 EX II x2

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nathan
Can you repeat the question, please?
Avatar
7,900 posts
Gallery: 18 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 361
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Boston
     
Nov 13, 2013 14:26 |  #93

cdifoto wrote in post #16447258 (external link)
Assuming the same kiss, I would say the mere passage of time and/or the exclusivity of three dimensional space occupation is what separates those images. Not creativity.

Talking about 3 dimensional space, I think that sometimes a photographer is able to approach a subject from a perspective that is altogether unique and creative.

20 unskilled and skilled photographers can take the same photo of a kiss, creating adequate to technically perfect images of a bride and groom kissing. Perhaps it's the creative photographer who thinks a bit out of the box that steps back and decides to take a photograph of the entire room, audience cheering and reacting to the kiss on one side and 20 photographers clamoring for that "perfect shot" on the other.

It takes skill and experience to see something and press the shutter button, but it takes creativity to have vision.


Taking photos with a fancy camera does not make me a photographer.
www.nathantpham.com (external link) | Boston POTN Flickr (external link) |
5D3 x2 | 16-35L II | 50L | 85L II | 100L | 135L | 580 EX II x2

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
airfrogusmc
I'm a chimper. There I said it...
37,966 posts
Gallery: 179 photos
Best ofs: 6
Likes: 13418
Joined May 2007
Location: Oak Park, Illinois
     
Nov 13, 2013 14:28 |  #94

Nathan wrote in post #16448890 (external link)
It takes skill and experience to see something and press the shutter button, but it takes creativity to have vision.

bw!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Charlie
THREAD ­ STARTER
Guess What! I'm Pregnant!
16,672 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 6634
Joined Sep 2007
     
Nov 13, 2013 14:29 |  #95

Nathan wrote in post #16448865 (external link)
Her photos don't mean any less to her. The issue here is that her photos don't mean anything to you.

There were two families at the baptism. I was only recording one, and she the other. They were ok with her photos as she was the only one taking photos for them, and including the key moments and posed shots afterwards. It's a formal event, and a sacrament, similar to a first communion or wedding.


Sony A7siii/A7iv/ZV-1 - FE 24/1.4 - SY 24/2.8 - FE 35/2.8 - FE 50/1.8 - FE 85/1.8 - F 600/5.6 - CZ 100-300 - Tamron 17-28/2.8 - 28-75/2.8 - 28-200 RXD
Panasonic GH6 - Laowa 7.5/2 - PL 15/1.7 - P 42.5/1.8 - OM 75/1.8 - PL 10-25/1.7 - P 12-32 - P 14-140

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Sibil
Cream of the Crop
10,415 posts
Likes: 54444
Joined Jan 2009
Location: SoCal
     
Nov 13, 2013 16:00 |  #96

airfrogusmc wrote in post #16448651 (external link)
I just find it hard to think that some would believe that Robert Franks work wasn't creative.
http://www.youtube.com​/watch?v=mHtRZBDOgag (external link)

Fascinating work. Such history there. Thanks for the link.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
fullyreclined
Member
Avatar
51 posts
Joined Sep 2006
Location: Toronto
     
Nov 13, 2013 16:36 |  #97

airfrogusmc wrote in post #16448790 (external link)
Ernst Haas said it so well in the quote I posted in # 85

I agree, he sums it up so well. The camera is simply a tool, a means to an end.


website (external link) | facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
pixiepearls
I do bad things in the dark
Avatar
3,061 posts
Joined Feb 2011
     
Nov 13, 2013 17:15 |  #98

I think that phones have already replaced P&S camera's. I think its also possible to replace the DSLR as some people use them because you can get lens's and other neat accessories that previously could only be gotten for a DSLR. Hopefully less people will buy DSLR's actually. The market has been so over saturated for some time IMHO.


Brandy 500px (external link)
I ♥ my 5D TF'd March '11
DARKROOM CHEMIST BLOG (external link) - My Dad's Pix (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RandyMN
Goldmember
3,131 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Aug 2005
     
Nov 13, 2013 17:45 |  #99

pixiepearls wrote in post #16449421 (external link)
I think that phones have already replaced P&S camera's. I think its also possible to replace the DSLR as some people use them because you can get lens's and other neat accessories that previously could only be gotten for a DSLR. Hopefully less people will buy DSLR's actually. The market has been so over saturated for some time IMHO.

I think cell phone cameras will most certainly put a big dent in P&S. Possibly even for those who would buy lower cost DSLR but prefer cell phone as quality improves. I doubt it will hurt the serious photographer since technology will also improve for their market.

Interesting article about liquid lenses for cell phones that use electrical current to vary the lens.

http://www.osa-opn.org …one_cameras/#.U​oQN4_moVLk (external link)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Sparky98
Goldmember
1,130 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 9
Joined Dec 2005
Location: East Texas
     
Nov 14, 2013 23:58 |  #100

Just as we have read through several posts essentially trying to define "creativity", we need the OP to define just what he means by "serious photography" so we can all be on the same page. Serious photography absolutely can be done with a cell phone camera. A skilled photographer could probably take a cell phone and produce images that would make a bride very happy if she was going to view the photographs on Facebook or the computer only. She might even be happy with some small prints. Would the quality of the photographs match the quality of the same images from a DSLR? Probably not. However, a skilled photographer might produce better work with a cell phone camera than a novice could produce with a DSLR. A cell phone camera is not the best tool for serious photography, but it can be used for serious photography, and the right photographer could produce some pretty impressive work depending on how you chose to view the images.


Joe
5DIII

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kkerry.photo
Member
Avatar
229 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 8
Joined Jan 2013
Location: Leics, UK
     
Nov 15, 2013 08:33 |  #101

kf095 wrote in post #16443314 (external link)
First what is serious photography ?
Taking snapshots at church to post then at FB isn't serious photography.
Taking macros, like real macros, taking portraits like real portraits is serious photography.
Good luck for taking it with mobile phone.

You obviously havn't seen this thread? All shot with a mobile.


The Gear: Canon 60D
Canon 'Nifty Fity' 50mm f1.8 II
Canon 10-18mm f4-5.6 IS STM
Canon 70-200mm f4L USM
Canon 35mm f2.8 IS STM Macro

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Nathan
Can you repeat the question, please?
Avatar
7,900 posts
Gallery: 18 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 361
Joined Aug 2007
Location: Boston
     
Nov 15, 2013 09:14 |  #102

Lol... all this back and forth about "creativity". I just went back and read some of the comments here. There's a lot of inherent focus on the "creation" of a photograph, i.e. an image as a thing. Creativity isn't just about the final product. Merriam-Webster online defines it as "the ability to make new things or think of new ideas." That's a broader definition than what some people have adhered to in this thread. "Vision" or the ability to see, I would argue, falls into that "idea" category.

If 10 photographers photograph a wedding moment (dance or kiss or whatever) from a similar angle... the 1 photographer who chooses to shoot from outside the banquet hall through a window could be credited with being creative. He thought outside the box, with a new fresh idea about how to capture the scene. He didn't create the actual photograph (the camera did) nor did he set up the lighting and stage the people. However, he had the creative idea to shoot differently than other people.

Does that help settle some of this debate?


Taking photos with a fancy camera does not make me a photographer.
www.nathantpham.com (external link) | Boston POTN Flickr (external link) |
5D3 x2 | 16-35L II | 50L | 85L II | 100L | 135L | 580 EX II x2

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ebusinesstutor
Member
Avatar
137 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4
Joined Apr 2011
Location: Nanaimo, BC Canada
     
Nov 15, 2013 13:26 |  #103

garbidz wrote in post #16439656 (external link)
And the main thing: It is not the camera tat makes the good shots, it is the guy behind it.
The cameras have been better than the casual photographer for more than a decade now.

I agree with this whole heartedly. If A great photographer who understands composition and light hands swaps their DSLR for the event with a photography-challenged iPhone owner (I know this makes us all cringe) and both take shots of the event, I believe the better shots would be taken by the professional photographer.

Of course, the pro could do even more with better equipment, but spending more money on equipment doesn't make you a better photographer. (I know, I've tried) :)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Wilt
Reader's Digest Condensed version of War and Peace [POTN Vol 1]
Avatar
46,454 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 4545
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Belmont, CA
     
Nov 15, 2013 15:29 |  #104

garbidz wrote in post #16439656 (external link)
About a two years ago I posted a thread here asking if iPhones are about to kill the point-and-shoots.
The answer seems to be 'yes'.

All hope is not lost, even for the P&S. One of my adult stepdaughters, who is not a hobbyist in photography, sees the limits of using her smartphone camera, said that she wanted to get herself a P&S a year and a half ago. We gave one to her for Xmas last year.

Unfortunately she dropped it in the sand while at the beach, and the zoom now doesn't. I'm not giving her one to replace the one we got her, because it was one with a Leica lens that I managed to get at a really low price. That she broke her camera before even a year had passed is now her problem to live with. I see how her generation is so brutal with their phones, etc. and have to wonder... don't they know how to care for anything?! I lent my P&S once to my youngest (adult) stepdaughter, got it back after almost 6 months, and it looked like it had been in a war zone...never again loan her something of mine! Her smartphones get broken, lost, and beat up horribly, too!


You need to give me OK to edit your image and repost! Keep POTN alive and well with member support https://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.p​hp
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Sibil
Cream of the Crop
10,415 posts
Likes: 54444
Joined Jan 2009
Location: SoCal
     
Nov 15, 2013 17:07 |  #105

Wilt wrote in post #16454439 (external link)
.. don't they know how to care for anything?!

With teenagers, they don't care and actually brake their cell phones on purpose so their parents will get them the latest model.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

12,422 views & 0 likes for this thread, 38 members have posted to it.
Serious photography..... with a phone.
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is ahmed0essam
1461 guests, 165 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.