kin2son Goldmember 4,546 posts Likes: 3 Joined May 2011 Location: Sydney, Australia More info | Dec 05, 2013 18:12 | #466  Permanent banunistudent1962 wrote in post #16504634  My point being there's a lot of condescending wankers on forums such as this. That's your comeback? That's it?!?!?! 5D3 Gripped / 17-40L / Σ35 / 40 Pancake / Zeiss 50 MP / Σ85 / 100L Macro / 70-200 f2.8L II IS / 430 EX II / 580 EX II / Canon 2xIII TC / Kenko Ext. Tubes
LOG IN TO REPLY |
1Tanker Goldmember  4,470 posts Likes: 8 Joined Jan 2011 Location: Swaying to the Symphony of Destruction More info | Dec 05, 2013 18:14 | #467 trewyn15 wrote in post #16504691 Taken with my rebel t3. Shoulda went MKIII, would have looked so much better.  IMG_3661-2 by MitchTrewynPhotography, on FlickrI see no other body in your sig, so if you'd had a "MK III" as well, you wouldn't have used it? Kel
LOG IN TO REPLY |
trewyn15 Senior Member  731 posts Likes: 26 Joined Dec 2012 Location: Janesville/Milwaukee WI More info | Dec 05, 2013 18:17 | #468 1Tanker wrote in post #16504704 I see no other body in your sig, so if you'd had a "MK III" as well, you wouldn't have used it?  That's not at all what I said, but I can understand the misunderstanding Mitch
LOG IN TO REPLY |
unistudent1962 Member 166 posts Likes: 1 Joined Sep 2010 Location: Brisbane QLD Australia More info | Dec 05, 2013 18:29 | #469 kin2son wrote in post #16504697 That's your comeback? That's it?!?!?! It was never about need but want. Most Rebel owners put up the weight and size of a DSLR hoping to get better IQ than their p&s or mobile. FF owners basically have the same thoughts. Subject matter has nothing to do with the argument whatsoever. Not a comeback, an observation related to the number of "experts" who make 1000s of one-line posts on every imaginable topic. Canon 70D w/Grip l Canon 60D w/Grip l EF 100-400 F4.5-5.6L IS l EF 70-200 f4L IS l EF-S 15-85 f3.5-5.6 IS USM l EF 100mm f2.8 USM Macro l EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS STM l EF 50 f1.8 II l EF-S 10-22 f3.5-4.5 USM l 430 EX II Flash l Manfrotto 055XPROB + 498RC2 Tripod l Benro MP-96 M8 Monopod l Lowepro Vertex 200 AW Backpack l Lowepro Pro Runner 300 AW Backpack l PS CS5 Extended l Lightroom 4.3
LOG IN TO REPLY |
ScubaDude Goldmember  1,104 posts Likes: 7 Joined Sep 2011 Location: Waveland, MS More info | Dec 05, 2013 23:01 | #470 Permanent banI have a T1i and a 7D. While the 7D has many features that the T1i is lacking, the picture quality is identical. If you need the features, upgrade. If you need better picture quality, look at upgrading to full-frame. Canon [7D & BG-E7 grip] [T1i & BG-E5 grip] [400mm f/5.6L] [50mm f/1.8 II] [18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS]
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Azathoth " ...whose name no lips dare speak aloud"  More info | Dec 06, 2013 06:49 | #471 trewyn15 wrote in post #16504691 Taken with my rebel t3. Shoulda went MKIII, would have looked so much better. IMG_3661-2 by MitchTrewynPhotography, on FlickrFinding a better subject and much nicer light helps:  Fall by RicardoPestana2012, on FlickrTaken with the same camera. If you would take that same photo with a 5dmk3 it would look like crap again. 500px
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dec 06, 2013 07:26 | #472 No point in creating a new thread is the 600d fast enough for youth sports? Talking about 5 and 6 year olds. I already have the 85mm 1.8. Personal Trainer with random hobbies.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
auto-clicker Senior Member 819 posts Likes: 37 Joined Dec 2009 More info | Dec 06, 2013 07:38 | #473 This is one of those threads about penis envy .
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dec 06, 2013 07:39 | #474 OneDeep wrote in post #16505849 No point in creating a new thread is the 600d fast enough for youth sports? Talking about 5 and 6 year olds. I already have the 85mm 1.8. For youth sports I would expect the limitations to be low light conditions. The T3i has an identical sensor to my 60D and I can shoot with credible results to ISO6400 even to ISO12800. Gerry
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dec 06, 2013 07:56 | #475 trewyn15 wrote in post #16504691 Taken with my rebel t3. Shoulda went MKIII, would have looked so much better. IMG_3661-2 by MitchTrewynPhotography, on FlickrTrue fact. Diffraction limit is higher, and you were shooting at f/22. Would have been sharper full frame. Good point. 1D MkIV | 1D MkIII | 550D w/grip & ML| EF 70-200mm f2.8L| EF 24-105mm f4L IS | Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS | Samyang 14mm f/2.8 IF ED UMC | 430EXii | EF 50mm f1.8
LOG IN TO REPLY |
trewyn15 Senior Member 731 posts Likes: 26 Joined Dec 2012 Location: Janesville/Milwaukee WI More info | Dec 06, 2013 08:06 | #476 Azathoth wrote in post #16505802 Finding a better subject and much nicer light helps: Taken with the same camera. If you would take that same photo with a 5dmk3 it would look like crap again. waterrockets wrote in post #16505922 True fact. Diffraction limit is higher, and you were shooting at f/22. Would have been sharper full frame. Good point. This is starting to make sense. Mitch
LOG IN TO REPLY |
trewyn15 Senior Member 731 posts Likes: 26 Joined Dec 2012 Location: Janesville/Milwaukee WI More info | Dec 06, 2013 08:10 | #477 Azathoth wrote in post #16505802 Finding a better subject and much nicer light helps: Taken with the same camera. If you would take that same photo with a 5dmk3 it would look like crap again. Same for you, is there a reason you limit the viewing size to 1024? Mitch
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dec 06, 2013 08:15 | #478 trewyn15 wrote in post #16505940 This is starting to make sense. The Full frame guys here are like the Ferrari owners. The stuck up ones. lmao, no full frame here. I shoot with my rebel as much as my 1D these days. 1D MkIV | 1D MkIII | 550D w/grip & ML| EF 70-200mm f2.8L| EF 24-105mm f4L IS | Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS | Samyang 14mm f/2.8 IF ED UMC | 430EXii | EF 50mm f1.8
LOG IN TO REPLY |
trewyn15 Senior Member 731 posts Likes: 26 Joined Dec 2012 Location: Janesville/Milwaukee WI More info | Dec 06, 2013 08:21 | #479 waterrockets wrote in post #16505962 lmao, no full frame here. I shoot with my rebel as much as my 1D these days. So you can dish the sarcasm, but can't take it back at you? Who's stuck up? Oh I was taking it back just fine. Just stating what I have noticed around here (in some people, not all). Mitch
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Blaster6 Member  238 posts Likes: 1 Joined Feb 2013 Location: Central PA More info | Dec 06, 2013 08:22 | #480 trewyn15 wrote in post #16505940 This is starting to make sense. The Full frame guys here are like the Ferrari owners. The stuck up ones. Anyone spouting off about how a full frame is always better probably has a very narrow range of photography experience. I have both crop and full frame. They serve different purposes. Some people don't understand a Rebel is a tool for a certain kind of job and even has some advantages. If they can't understand this then the joke is on them. No, I never claimed to be outstanding in the field of photography. I said I was out standing in the field taking photos.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is IoDaLi Photography 1181 guests, 130 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
