I've done some searches and have to admit to being a little overwhelmed trying to pick up on what is the best way to go. I plan on keeping my Canon 1DM3 and 24-105 as well as 70-200 II but maybe selling the 135 (winces) for a small but capable camera like the Fuji. I want to use it on an upcoming trip to Ethiopia where it can be a real PITA to lug around the DSLR (for what I am doing there). I'll mainly be shooting people and some landscape type stuff.
First, does this sound like a good way to go for my purposes and second, (with budget in mind..proceeds from the 135 sale mainly), which camera would you buy and why? Sorry for such an open ended type question but I feel like the more I searched, the more uncertain I became about which way to go. Thanks!

I gave up the idea because the body itself isn't cheaper than a 5d mark 1. Two, too many features I don't even bother to use (filters, video, articulated LC screen, and etc). Many reviews I read that the AF system isn't great for moving subjects. And I wanted to use my Olympus OM manual lenses on it. The om to fx adapter is huge. I think you are better off getting a 5d classic and a handful of Olympus OM lenses + the OM-EOS adapter. The size isn't big.
First generation so it will have its growing pains, and Sony doesn't seem to understand fast lenses (*scratches head at 2.8 primes) but they aren't afraid to throw tech in a small body 
