-=Straight From Camera (RAW/JPEG) Image Thread=- Share your work!

Here it is guys--the thread we've *all* been waiting for.

Three rules.

Rule #1. All pictures must come straight from camera. No editing, touchups, photoshop, lightroom--which also means no white balance correction, noise reduction, sharpening, watermarking, or any post-processing or cropping whatsoever. Bottom line: Do not touch the photo. The only thing that may be done is image resize.

Rule #2. One photo per post (just to keep things neat)

Rule #3. Do not (not not not) forget rule #1.

Go!

Heya,

I'm game, I generally do very little post processing anyways (mostly because I'm terrible with the software and colorblind to red/green). My workflow usually involves crop, levels, saturation if necessary, save. But for this thread, none of that! These are straight out of camera JPEG as I do not shoot in RAW for casual walk around.

IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com/​photos/mwise1023/11065​772495/

IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com/​photos/mwise1023/11065​880833/

IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com/​photos/mwise1023/11065​729895/

IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com/​photos/mwise1023/11065​738195/

IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com/​photos/mwise1023/11065​840766/

IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com/​photos/mwise1023/11065​847006/

uh, it is not possible to post RAW images right from the camera.

Gregg.Siam wrote in post #16480909
uh, it is not possible to post RAW images right from the camera.

Shhhhh.

:P

I meant a picture that was originally taken in RAW or JPEG format. I'm tired. I don't know why I put that in the title.

7D
EF 28-105
.

IR 1D MK II, convert from raw, resize & post:

Gregg.Siam wrote in post #16480909
uh, it is not possible to post RAW images right from the camera.

Sure it is possible. Here's one as displayed in Raw Digger, a program for Raw file analysis. The only problem is that Raw images aren't very pretty. They are black and white because Raw is direct from the sensor and the sensor can't see colors, only differing intensities of light. The color is computer generated (or camera CPU generated) later. And they are kind of dark and flat, because the brightening and contrast adding also comes later as part of the processing. No sharpening either, but the OP did say no processing, so this is what you get. However, just to demonstrate the point, I'll also post the embedded jpg that I extracted from the Raw file.

I've posted this in the 6D thread and the high ISO thread, but this is straight from camera with no editing whatsoever.

Canon 6D, EF50mm F1.8 @ 12800 ISO @ F2.8 1/40 sec

IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com/​photos/gaabnz/11023222​484/

Here are a few. JPEG, SOC....

IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com …96522230@N03/11​076194015/

IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com …96522230@N03/11​076038743/

IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com …96522230@N03/11​076046013/

IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com …96522230@N03/11​076023894/

Converted from RAW with no Adjustments in DPP or LR...............

IMAGE LINK: http://s985.photobucke​t.com …s/media/Phasete​k.jpg.html

IMAGE LINK: http://s985.photobucke​t.com …Beers/media/Bar​n.jpg.html

Chief_10Beers wrote in post #16482463
Converted from RAW with no Adjustments in DPP or LR...............

IMAGE LINK: http://s985.photobucke​t.com …s/media/Phasete​k.jpg.html

IMAGE LINK: http://s985.photobucke​t.com …Beers/media/Bar​n.jpg.html

May or may not have paid more attention to your signature. Troop on, brother!

There should be rule 3 - one picture!

quadwing wrote in post #16482488
May or may not have paid more attention to your signature. Troop on, brother!

Roger That!...............

Resized only and converted to jpg, no crop.