Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
Thread started 26 Nov 2013 (Tuesday) 12:23
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

What's something that people tend to overlook when taking/editing a photo?

 
deronsizemore
Senior Member
455 posts
Gallery: 11 photos
Likes: 27
Joined Dec 2010
     
Nov 26, 2013 12:23 |  #1

I was just curious to get opinions on what photographers tend to overlook when either taking or editing a shot in post? I'm far from being a professional but one thing I seem to always notice instantly when photographers post photos on facebook and sites like that is if horizontal lines in the photo are actually horizontal. Example might be the horizon or maybe if a model is sitting on some stairs and they are tilted at an angel. I know there are times when these things are done on purpose for effect, but most of the time it completely turns me off to a photo.

What others do you have? I'm sure there's going to be loads that everyone could probably learn from.


Fuji X-T1 | Fuji 18-55 f/2.8-4 | Fuji 35 f/1.4
500px (external link) | Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nathancarter
Cream of the Crop
5,474 posts
Gallery: 32 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 609
Joined Dec 2010
     
Nov 26, 2013 12:53 |  #2

I think "horizon" is a little too specific. For portraiture, I would expand that to "backgrounds" in general. If the background distracts or detracts from the subject, then the portrait is a failure.

This is especially true when there's clutter like trash cans, other people, cars, etc. That stuff drives me nuts. Take half a step to the left and the clutter would have been out of frame or hidden by the subject... ugh.


Aside from that, most of the MWAC/GWC snapshots you see on Facebook are going to have little regard for lighting, composition, pose, expression. They're just snapshots, whaddaya expect.


http://www.avidchick.c​om (external link) for business stuff
http://www.facebook.co​m/VictorVoyeur (external link) for fun stuff

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
deronsizemore
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
455 posts
Gallery: 11 photos
Likes: 27
Joined Dec 2010
     
Nov 26, 2013 13:02 |  #3

nathancarter wrote in post #16481692 (external link)
I think "horizon" is a little too specific. For portraiture, I would expand that to "backgrounds" in general. If the background distracts or detracts from the subject, then the portrait is a failure.

This is especially true when there's clutter like trash cans, other people, cars, etc. That stuff drives me nuts. Take half a step to the left and the clutter would have been out of frame or hidden by the subject... ugh.

Good points. Yeah, saw a few photos the other day where the model was in an ally way posing all nice and cute and there in the background was a big green steel trash bin. Just took away from the photo I thought.

nathancarter wrote in post #16481692 (external link)
Aside from that, most of the MWAC/GWC snapshots you see on Facebook are going to have little regard for lighting, composition, pose, expression. They're just snapshots, whaddaya expect.

As for my comment on facebook posts, I was mainly referring to other "photographers" who post session pics. I'm friends with a few people who are photographers and get paid to take photos and I see their work all the time after a session and there's distracting objects in the background, horizon is titled 30 degrees, etc. Just distracting and these people are getting paid to do this.

Granted... I've only done two sessions currently and I have a lot of things I could also fix in my own work so I'm not excluded from this, e.g., cutting off fingers, or arms. But... I don't get paid to do it and both sessions I've done have just been freebies for friends so that I could gain more experience.


Fuji X-T1 | Fuji 18-55 f/2.8-4 | Fuji 35 f/1.4
500px (external link) | Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
BrickR
Cream of the Crop
5,935 posts
Likes: 115
Joined Mar 2011
Location: Dallas TX
     
Nov 26, 2013 17:06 |  #4

For glamour stuff, I hate seeing tags or stray threads dangling from lingerie.


My junk
The grass isn't greener on the other side, it's green where you water it.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
zantop
Member
Avatar
126 posts
Likes: 24
Joined Nov 2013
Location: Florida
     
Nov 26, 2013 17:22 |  #5

Dust spots. They're so obvious (unless you happen to see a UFO, the sky obviously doesn't have random dark blobs floating in it) and easy to remove in post if you can't figure out how to clean a sensor, yet I see them in SO many images...even some by really talented photographers.


NickZantop.com - my portfolio (external link) | ItsJustLight.com - photography tips & tutorials (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
OhLook
insufferably pedantic. I can live with that.
Avatar
24,862 posts
Gallery: 105 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 16263
Joined Dec 2012
Location: California: SF Bay Area
     
Nov 26, 2013 18:41 |  #6

deronsizemore wrote in post #16481604 (external link)
I was just curious to get opinions on what photographers tend to overlook when either taking or editing a shot in post? I'm far from being a professional

I'm far from it as well. I too often overlook irrelevant objects in the background, even large ones that I really should have seen. No excuse, and I don't have software that would enable removing things in PP. I overlook inappropriate settings left over from the last time; getting better at checking first.


PRONOUN ADVISORY: OhLook is a she. | A FEW CORRECT SPELLINGS: lens, aperture, amateur, hobbyist, per se, raccoon, whoa | Comments welcome

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kfreels
Goldmember
Avatar
4,297 posts
Likes: 11
Joined Aug 2010
Location: Princeton, IN
     
Nov 26, 2013 18:45 |  #7

I have to go with backgrounds as well.


I am serious....and don't call me Shirley.
Canon 7D and a bunch of other stuff

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
deronsizemore
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
455 posts
Gallery: 11 photos
Likes: 27
Joined Dec 2010
     
Nov 26, 2013 18:58 |  #8

OhLook wrote in post #16482424 (external link)
I'm far from it as well. I too often overlook irrelevant objects in the background, even large ones that I really should have seen. No excuse, and I don't have software that would enable removing things in PP. I overlook inappropriate settings left over from the last time; getting better at checking first.

Same here. I have a hard time framing subjects and not cutting hands, arms, legs, etc off. I try to compose and frame the shot in camera so I don't have to crop in post which leaves me paying attention to the compositon and then forgetting about extremities I may be cutting off. Work in progress.


Fuji X-T1 | Fuji 18-55 f/2.8-4 | Fuji 35 f/1.4
500px (external link) | Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sirquack
Goldmember
Avatar
2,599 posts
Gallery: 66 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 937
Joined Jan 2013
Location: Des Moines, Iowa
     
Nov 26, 2013 19:25 |  #9

Stray hair. I always notice it after I have taken the shots and get home and realize most of the pictures have stray hair in the middle of the subjects face. Yes I can usually minimize or remove it, but it takes more time than it is worth in most cases.
The other is any outdoor photography. I have done a couple of family sessions and in each case the families invariably want to do the session mid day and the high sun just kills contrast and makes the lighting flat. Sometimes I just want to kill the whole session and reshoot, but the timing usually doesn't work out for me or the family.


Name is Ron.
Bodies - 6D/5D3/7D2-Gripped
Lenses - Canon 17-40 F4/24-70 F2.8 II/85 F1.8/Canon 70-200 F2.8 II/F4/Sigma 30 DC/Tamron 150-600
Website (external link)
Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kfreels
Goldmember
Avatar
4,297 posts
Likes: 11
Joined Aug 2010
Location: Princeton, IN
     
Nov 26, 2013 19:39 |  #10

sirquack wrote in post #16482514 (external link)
...
The other is any outdoor photography. I have done a couple of family sessions and in each case the families invariably want to do the session mid day and the high sun just kills contrast and makes the lighting flat. Sometimes I just want to kill the whole session and reshoot, but the timing usually doesn't work out for me or the family.

You really need to move into the shade when you shoot. If there is any bright sunlight in the background it may blow out so you have to watch it. Use an off-camera flash that can generate more light than the sunlit portion. Then the sunlight becomes fill light and you have complete control over the main light to shape how you want. It will also allow you to darken the background a bit which provides a little separation. If you want to get even fancier, you can look for "edge light" to provide some highlights on the hair and such. That can be tricky but is awesome when you get it right.

Your flash sync only goes so high but if your flash supports high speed sync you can use wider apertures and faster shutter speeds. If you don't have access to that, a good ND filter can also be used to let you shoot wider apertures and keep the shutter speed below the flash sync speed.


I am serious....and don't call me Shirley.
Canon 7D and a bunch of other stuff

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TooManyShots
Cream of the Crop
10,203 posts
Likes: 532
Joined Jan 2008
Location: NYC
     
Nov 26, 2013 19:42 |  #11
bannedPermanent ban

Vertical and horizontal lines. Makes sure they are straightened. Watch the edges of your frame. "Things" can get chopped off. Or "things" may get in and they may ruin your shots.


One Imaging Photography (external link) and my Flickr (external link)
Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
phantelope
Goldmember
Avatar
1,889 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 40
Joined Sep 2008
Location: NorCal
     
Nov 26, 2013 20:40 |  #12

I need to train myself to leave some room for cropping to avoid the missing fingertip or flip of a shirt. I tend to work very fast with models and at times having a bit more room to play would have saved an otherwise nice shot, since the model moved too fast out of frame and I didn't pay enough attention.

Of course there's always the crap in the background or the studio ceiling behind her head (I often shoot from low positions) or the background paper ending too early, LOL


40D, 5D3, a bunch of lenses and other things :cool:

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jefzor
Senior Member
788 posts
Gallery: 5 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 25
Joined Jul 2013
     
Nov 26, 2013 23:52 |  #13

I think the most overlooked thing is the photo itself. No point spending 3 hours on editing on a boring shot.

Other than that, I'd say the white balance gets overlooked quite often.


www.jefpauwels.be (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
cdifoto
Don't get pissy with me
Avatar
34,090 posts
Likes: 44
Joined Dec 2005
     
Nov 26, 2013 23:57 |  #14

My own problem is shooting too tight. I forget to back up a little, wanting to use every available pixel and it screws me when someone wants, say, an 8x10.


Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here (external link). Cursing at your worse-than-a-map reflector? Check out this vid! (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bad ­ Habit
Goldmember
Avatar
2,102 posts
Gallery: 53 photos
Likes: 164
Joined Apr 2011
Location: If I'm not here, I must be someplace else
     
Nov 27, 2013 00:11 |  #15

I agree on the shooting too tight. A little room allows you to straighten horizons or balance the overall placement of the subject. Too many times I try and fill the frame and then when you straighten, you start chopping things off


JR / flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,104 views & 0 likes for this thread, 18 members have posted to it.
What's something that people tend to overlook when taking/editing a photo?
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is ealarcon
504 guests, 139 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.