Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
Thread started 26 Nov 2013 (Tuesday) 12:23
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

What's something that people tend to overlook when taking/editing a photo?

 
sirquack
Goldmember
Avatar
2,599 posts
Gallery: 66 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 937
Joined Jan 2013
Location: Des Moines, Iowa
     
Nov 27, 2013 07:41 |  #16

I am definitely learning the suggestions you mentioned here. I tried for shady spots, but as you mentioned, a lot of the backgrounds then get blown out since they might be in full sun.
I did use my flash for fill and to overpower some of the shadows, but I did not gel so the light was was off balance between ambient and flash.
I try to learn something from every shoot. I appreciate your input, I will have to try to apply some of it in application and see if I can get better at it.

Ron
Here is an example of one where the ambient and flash were too apparent.

IMAGE: http://farm4.staticflickr.com/3724/10662940895_3955e5d755_c.jpg
IMAGE LINK: http://www.flickr.com/​photos/sirquack/106629​40895/  (external link)
Mortensen-Family-44 (external link) by R Dean Photography (external link), on Flickr

kfreels wrote in post #16482537 (external link)
You really need to move into the shade when you shoot. If there is any bright sunlight in the background it may blow out so you have to watch it. Use an off-camera flash that can generate more light than the sunlit portion. Then the sunlight becomes fill light and you have complete control over the main light to shape how you want. It will also allow you to darken the background a bit which provides a little separation. If you want to get even fancier, you can look for "edge light" to provide some highlights on the hair and such. That can be tricky but is awesome when you get it right.

Your flash sync only goes so high but if your flash supports high speed sync you can use wider apertures and faster shutter speeds. If you don't have access to that, a good ND filter can also be used to let you shoot wider apertures and keep the shutter speed below the flash sync speed.


Name is Ron.
Bodies - 6D/5D3/7D2-Gripped
Lenses - Canon 17-40 F4/24-70 F2.8 II/85 F1.8/Canon 70-200 F2.8 II/F4/Sigma 30 DC/Tamron 150-600
Website (external link)
Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
deronsizemore
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
455 posts
Gallery: 11 photos
Likes: 27
Joined Dec 2010
     
Nov 27, 2013 08:58 |  #17

jefzor wrote in post #16482998 (external link)
Other than that, I'd say the white balance gets overlooked quite often.

Yeah that's one I see quite often. It's probably one I spend way too much time on myself in post as I don't always get it right in camera.


Fuji X-T1 | Fuji 18-55 f/2.8-4 | Fuji 35 f/1.4
500px (external link) | Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Aki78
Senior Member
Avatar
963 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 34
Joined Jun 2006
Location: New Hampshire USA
     
Nov 27, 2013 09:17 |  #18

TooManyShots wrote in post #16482546 (external link)
Vertical and horizontal lines. Makes sure they are straightened. Watch the edges of your frame. "Things" can get chopped off. Or "things" may get in and they may ruin your shots.

Definitely. Depending on the mood being created uneven lines can create a feel of uncertainty and movement, etc.

Another thing is editing with non-calibrated monitor and the output may seem okay on their monitor but to others it could be completely off in color & lighting.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
shanehawley
Member
89 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Nov 2013
     
Nov 27, 2013 09:51 |  #19

I always edit the picture to where I like it, then after I print it or post it online, ill realize there were a couple things I should have cloned out or covered up. Happens all the time! Cloning isnt usually on my to do list so it gets forgotten about a lot!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DocFrankenstein
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
12,324 posts
Likes: 13
Joined Apr 2004
Location: where the buffalo roam
     
Nov 29, 2013 12:06 |  #20

It's too general a question...

More often than not, the biggest mistake is ignoring the little voice in their head telling them not to press the shutter. Or to sell their camera gear and take up another hobby.


National Sarcasm Society. Like we need your support.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
deronsizemore
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
455 posts
Gallery: 11 photos
Likes: 27
Joined Dec 2010
     
Nov 29, 2013 12:43 |  #21

DocFrankenstein wrote in post #16488364 (external link)
It's too general a question...

More often than not, the biggest mistake is ignoring the little voice in their head telling them not to press the shutter. Or to sell their camera gear and take up another hobby.

So you're saying you think too many times people will take a picture even though they know that there's really nothing interesting about it?


Fuji X-T1 | Fuji 18-55 f/2.8-4 | Fuji 35 f/1.4
500px (external link) | Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MDiCola
Member
Avatar
39 posts
Joined Jul 2011
Location: Northeast US
     
Nov 29, 2013 12:57 |  #22

over doing the contrast in post processing. i dont know how many people do it, but take a look in your info pallette in photoshop in your shadows and highlights and see if there's information, if not you probably over did the contrast.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DocFrankenstein
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
12,324 posts
Likes: 13
Joined Apr 2004
Location: where the buffalo roam
     
Nov 29, 2013 13:04 |  #23

deronsizemore wrote in post #16488432 (external link)
So you're saying you think too many times people will take a picture even though they know that there's really nothing interesting about it?

Yes. Too little attention paid as to why you're taking a shot of it, when, how it's lit, how it's composed...

Or stuff like who's going to view the photograph... is it going to be a print or web use... etc.

It all influences composition decisions. If you want to make an avatar for facebook, you'll frame to crop out top of the head and chin. If you want to make a huge print, you can get away by making the person a small part of the environment and still get the message across. But not vice versa...


National Sarcasm Society. Like we need your support.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
kfreels
Goldmember
Avatar
4,297 posts
Likes: 11
Joined Aug 2010
Location: Princeton, IN
     
Nov 29, 2013 17:26 |  #24

deronsizemore wrote in post #16488432 (external link)
So you're saying you think too many times people will take a picture even though they know that there's really nothing interesting about it?

All the time. Then they resolve to putting a bunch of filters on the image to try to give it some kind of feeling that couldn't be achieved with composition and lighting.


I am serious....and don't call me Shirley.
Canon 7D and a bunch of other stuff

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
KirkS518
Goldmember
Avatar
3,983 posts
Likes: 24
Joined Apr 2012
Location: Central Gulf Coast, Flori-duh
     
Nov 30, 2013 06:49 |  #25

What I can't stand in photos are halos from processing. So unnatural, and just unattractive. Do it right, or not at all.


If steroids are illegal for athletes, should PS be illegal for models?
Digital - 50D, 20D IR Conv, 9 Lenses from 8mm to 300mm
Analog - Mamiya RB67 Pro-SD, Canon A-1, Nikon F4S, YashicaMat 124G, Rollei 35S, QL17 GIII, Zeiss Ikon Ikoflex 1st Version, and and entire room full of lenses and other stuff

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
drvnbysound
Goldmember
3,316 posts
Likes: 12
Joined Aug 2009
     
Nov 30, 2013 08:55 |  #26

deronsizemore wrote in post #16481604 (external link)
I was just curious to get opinions on what photographers tend to overlook when either taking or editing a shot in post? I'm far from being a professional but one thing I seem to always notice instantly when photographers post photos on facebook and sites like that is if horizontal lines in the photo are actually horizontal. Example might be the horizon or maybe if a model is sitting on some stairs and they are tilted at an angel. I know there are times when these things are done on purpose for effect, but most of the time it completely turns me off to a photo.

What others do you have? I'm sure there's going to be loads that everyone could probably learn from.

I don't mind if things lead me to a angel, but I don't like pictures that are tilted at an angle ;)
---------------

cdifoto wrote in post #16483004 (external link)
My own problem is shooting too tight. I forget to back up a little, wanting to use every available pixel and it screws me when someone wants, say, an 8x10.

Bad Habit wrote in post #16483021 (external link)
I agree on the shooting too tight. A little room allows you to straighten horizons or balance the overall placement of the subject. Too many times I try and fill the frame and then when you straighten, you start chopping things off

+1 for this. What's interesting to me is that when I started shooting people, I would always be too far away. I figured I could always crop closer, but there were so few pixels on the subject that I was losing sharpness because there wasn't enough resolution for the details. Today, I often find that I shoot too tight and don't have room to crop.
---------------

To answer the question myself, I'd say backgrounds and hands. As others have mentioned, I find myself noticing a lot of distracting elements in backgrounds all the time. Beyond that, I also tend to look at hand placement a lot as well, and oddly placed/posed hands distract me. Unfortunately, I never notice it in my own shooting until I've downloaded them; something I want to get better at.


I use manual exposure settings on the copy machine
..::Gear Listing::.. --==Feedback==--
...A few umbrella brackets I own...

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
OhLook
insufferably pedantic. I can live with that.
Avatar
24,862 posts
Gallery: 105 photos
Best ofs: 2
Likes: 16263
Joined Dec 2012
Location: California: SF Bay Area
     
Nov 30, 2013 10:14 |  #27

drvnbysound wrote in post #16490135 (external link)
I don't mind if things lead me to a angel, but I don't like pictures that are tilted at an angle ;)

What's interesting to me is that when I started shooing people, I would always be too far away.

There's no need to shoo people unless they're too close. ;)


PRONOUN ADVISORY: OhLook is a she. | A FEW CORRECT SPELLINGS: lens, aperture, amateur, hobbyist, per se, raccoon, whoa | Comments welcome

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
drvnbysound
Goldmember
3,316 posts
Likes: 12
Joined Aug 2009
     
Nov 30, 2013 11:05 |  #28

OhLook wrote in post #16490281 (external link)
There's no need to shoo people unless they're too close. ;)

Nicely done. :p


I use manual exposure settings on the copy machine
..::Gear Listing::.. --==Feedback==--
...A few umbrella brackets I own...

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

4,103 views & 0 likes for this thread, 18 members have posted to it.
What's something that people tend to overlook when taking/editing a photo?
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Stuff General Photography Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is ealarcon
504 guests, 139 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.