Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 27 Nov 2013 (Wednesday) 10:29
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

Monitor Calibration help

 
Pumba
Member
193 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2012
Location: Nr Stonehenge
     
Nov 27, 2013 10:29 |  #1

Ok im lost, looking at all the different calibrators, Which one is recommended? I have a 2012 27" iMac running mavericks.... Budget wise, not really a set budget as such, but would rather not buy the best of the best if it has no advantage for me, I am only a hobbyist :)


6d, 70d, 70-300L, [COLOR="Black"]100L Macro, 40mm 2.8 STM, 580exii, 430ex and still NO idea

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
bpalermini
Goldmember
Avatar
1,793 posts
Gallery: 197 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 1292
Joined Mar 2011
Location: Ashland, Oregon
     
Nov 27, 2013 10:33 |  #2

I have a Datacolor Spyder3 that I calibrate my Mac laptop and PC desktop. It has worked well for me. The Spyder4 is out now and they are claiming a bunch of new features and even better performance. I have the Pro model which lets you calibrate multi-monitor systems. It costs about $120 at Amazon.


Bob
R6II, R6, EF 16-35L II 2.8, EF 24-70L II 2.8, RF 50 1.8, EF 100L Macro 2.8, RF 70-200L 2.8, EF 100-400L II, EF 200-400L 4, EF 1.4xIII, EF 2xIII, 580EXII, YN560IV, RRS TVC23 + BH55, Fuji X-E2, Fuji X30, LRCC, PSCC
My Web Site (external link) | My Sports Portfolio (external link) | Instagram @bobpal

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Titus213
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
19,403 posts
Gallery: 4 photos
Likes: 36
Joined Feb 2005
Location: Kalama, WA USA
     
Nov 27, 2013 21:08 |  #3

I use the Spyder3 also. It works well on my iMac 27 running Mavericks. The only issue is the calibration reminder interval doesn't seem to get saved and pops up off and on reminding me to recalibrate.

Get a calibrator that will also adjust the brightness of your monitor. Mine was set for somewhere north of 180 cdm2. Recommended is 80 cdm2. It took my eyes a bit to get used to the dimmer monitor but my prints are looking much brighter.


Dave
Perspiring photographer.
Visit NorwoodPhotos.comexternal link

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Lowner
"I'm the original idiot"
Avatar
12,924 posts
Likes: 18
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Salisbury, UK.
     
Nov 28, 2013 03:54 |  #4

I'm happy with my Gretamacbeth eye-One display 2 which also claims to be a "professional" calibrator, whatever that means.


Richard

http://rcb4344.zenfoli​o.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Damo77
Goldmember
Avatar
4,699 posts
Likes: 115
Joined Apr 2007
Location: Brisbane, Australia
     
Nov 30, 2013 04:20 |  #5

Calibrator buying advice (external link)


Damien
Website (external link) | Facebook (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Pumba
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
193 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2012
Location: Nr Stonehenge
     
Dec 15, 2013 13:17 |  #6

Bringing this back up, I have just calibrated my monitor with a spider 4 pro, And the brightness as suggested was 120cdm2, but after reading Damien's guide whilst setting it up and using his recommended option choices :) , I went lower than that to 90cdm2 but it still seems really bright, I have sent off some test pictures to see how they come back,

Is it worth re-calibrating again with lower brightness.


6d, 70d, 70-300L, [COLOR="Black"]100L Macro, 40mm 2.8 STM, 580exii, 430ex and still NO idea

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 569
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
Dec 15, 2013 16:09 |  #7

Pumba wrote in post #16529346 (external link)
Bringing this back up, I have just calibrated my monitor with a spider 4 pro, And the brightness as suggested was 120cdm2, but after reading Damien's guide whilst setting it up and using his recommended option choices :) , I went lower than that to 90cdm2 but it still seems really bright, I have sent off some test pictures to see how they come back,

Is it worth re-calibrating again with lower brightness.

Wait until the test prints come back, and tweak the settings as needed. As to re-calibrating, it's not as much about the brightness but especially about the color-matching.

One thing about the brightness, though: when you check those test prints be sure that you view them in "good" light. This will typically not be the light that you use to edit. Viewing prints should be done in light in which, well, they will be actually viewed, enough light to bring out the details. Now, you can buy lights that will be "neutral" and bright enough...although taking the print outside in daytime but not in direct sunlight can for "normal" uses be good!


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
navydoc
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
14,971 posts
Gallery: 236 photos
Likes: 17609
Joined Oct 2009
Location: Inland Empire, So. Cal
     
Dec 15, 2013 16:40 as a reply to  @ tonylong's post |  #8

As to re-calibrating, it's not as much about the brightness but especially about the color-matching.

And I would think it's not so much colors being off but the brightness of the image on the monitor not matching the brightness of the printed image.

I think most issues stem from LCD monitors that are too bright and the photos are edited to look good on the bright screen. Then when it comes time to print, the print comes out darker than it looks on that bright monitor.


Gene - My Photo Gallery || (external link) My USS Oriskany website (external link) || My Flickr (external link)
Take nothing but photos - leave nothing but footprints - break nothing but silence - kill nothing but time.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 569
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
Dec 15, 2013 17:24 |  #9

navydoc wrote in post #16529816 (external link)
And I would think it's not so much colors being off but the brightness of the image on the monitor not matching the brightness of the printed image.

I think most issues stem from LCD monitors that are too bright and the photos are edited to look good on the bright screen. Then when it comes time to print, the print comes out darker than it looks on that bright monitor.

Yeah, to me brightness is a key factor!

What I see, though, is that calibration won't necessarily give the right results, which is why I tone down the brightness right off the bat, then do test prints!


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tonylong
...winded
Avatar
54,657 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Likes: 569
Joined Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
     
Dec 15, 2013 17:25 |  #10

When someone does some prints and complains about the colors, then obviously good calibration comes into play!


Tony
Two Canon cameras (5DC, 30D), three Canon lenses (24-105, 100-400, 100mm macro)
Tony Long Photos on PBase (external link)
Wildlife project pics here (external link), Biking Photog shoots here (external link), "Suburbia" project here (external link)! Mount St. Helens, Mount Hood pics here (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
HYPEBEAST!
Junior Member
Avatar
25 posts
Joined Jun 2008
Location: Portland, Oregon
     
Jan 30, 2014 20:03 |  #11

Sorry to bring this up from the dead, I didn't want to start a new thread.

Anyway, I recently just got the 30'' Apple Cinema Display and calibrated my screen with the 1iDisplay Pro. Everything looks great!

My question now is when I import the picture to my iPhone or iPad (Retina) the colors are a bit off and the picture is a bit overexposed.

If most of my pictures are being viewed via online (Smartphones, tablets, laptops) how should I calibrate my monitor?

To my understanding, calibrating my monitor is essential when it comes to printing correct?


n00b in training: Canon 60D Gripped | Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS | Canon 430 EX | MacBook Air | Lightroom 4 | Photoshop CS5

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PhotosGuy
Cream of the Crop, R.I.P.
Avatar
75,941 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 2610
Joined Feb 2004
Location: Middle of Michigan
     
Jan 30, 2014 23:06 |  #12

You're best off calibrating to a standard, otherwise you'll go nuts. Some browsers are calibrated. Some are not. Most windoze viewers are not. A lot of tablets, desktops, & laptops are not. I suspect that those people without calibration won't notice the difference, anyway.

HYPEBEAST! wrote in post #16651331 (external link)
To my understanding, calibrating my monitor is essential when it comes to printing correct?

I recommend it, unless you're very lucky. ; )


FrankC - 20D, RAW, Manual everything...
Classic Carz, Racing, Air Show, Flowers.
Find the light... A few Car Lighting Tips, and MOVE YOUR FEET!
Have you thought about making your own book? // Need an exposure crutch?
New Image Size Limits: Image must not exceed 1600 pixels on any side.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tzalman
Fatal attraction.
Avatar
13,497 posts
Likes: 213
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Gesher Haziv, Israel
     
Jan 31, 2014 01:18 |  #13

My iPad is not color managed but doesn't look too horrible with sRGB images. Spyder4 has an app that you attach the iPad by USB to a computer with the Datacolor software and it calibrates the app's photo viewer.


Elie / אלי

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dave_bass5
Goldmember
Avatar
4,329 posts
Gallery: 34 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 303
Joined Apr 2005
Location: London, centre of the universe
     
Jan 31, 2014 08:42 |  #14

Timely thread (resurrection).
Having just got my first iPad with Retina (had a iPad 2 for a couple of years) im finding the same thing.
I have a Spyder 4 and have had great success with calibrating my Dell IPS monitors. I find if i output from LR to JPG i get a good consistent colour.
On my iPad 2 the colours look almost just as good, but on my iPad Air (and iPhone 5S)they seem off. A bit more yellow or green in them, and the blues look more purple.
I cant find anything wrong with the Retina display as such, its even and i cant really detect a colour cast.
Even using the Spyder IOS app makes no difference. I can see a very slight difference between having CM on and off in the app, but the overall look doesn't really change.


Dave.
Gallery@http://www.flickr.com/​photos/davebass5/ (external link)
Canon R7 | Canon EOS-M50 | Canon 24-70 f/2.8L MKII | 70-300L | 135L f/2.0 | EF-S 10-18 | 40 f/2.8 STM | 35mm f/2 IS | Canon S110 | Fuji F31FD | Canon 580EXII, 270EXII | Yongnuo YN-622C Triggers.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Clemnacious
Hatchling
8 posts
Joined Jan 2014
     
Feb 11, 2014 17:20 |  #15

dave_bass5 wrote in post #16652413 (external link)
Timely thread (resurrection).
Having just got my first iPad with Retina (had a iPad 2 for a couple of years) im finding the same thing.
I have a Spyder 4 and have had great success with calibrating my Dell IPS monitors. I find if i output from LR to JPG i get a good consistent colour.
On my iPad 2 the colours look almost just as good, but on my iPad Air (and iPhone 5S)they seem off. A bit more yellow or green in them, and the blues look more purple.
I cant find anything wrong with the Retina display as such, its even and i cant really detect a colour cast.
Even using the Spyder IOS app makes no difference. I can see a very slight difference between having CM on and off in the app, but the overall look doesn't really change.

Are you exporting images out of LR in the sRGB color space? That's about as standard and common as you can get. My iPad Air displays sRGB images just fine in all apps.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

3,716 views & 0 likes for this thread, 13 members have posted to it.
Monitor Calibration help
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is zachary24
1423 guests, 127 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.