Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
Thread started 01 Feb 2006 (Wednesday) 21:50
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

get printed or print yourself?

 
Calzinger
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,798 posts
Joined Jan 2006
Location: New York
     
Feb 02, 2006 14:25 as a reply to  @ post 1149395 |  #16

UncleDoug wrote:
Just to clarify my previouys post, what affects ink usage is what resolution the printer is set to run at. I.e. regular, super, photo, etc... which usually tanslates into an asscending scale of printing resolution.

File resolution will not affect ink usage.

I have a Lexmark X83. It's an all-in-one.
There are two settings that I use when printing photos: Print quality and paper type. I always set paper type to "glossy/photo paper" since I'm using kodak's ultima photo paper (the best they seem to offer). Then I set print quality which options are "quick", "normal", "photo", "max photo". I always use "max photo". I've never tried other settings. If the ink usage vs quality efficiency is moderate, I may just sacrifice quality since no one bothers to really look at the fine detail in my shots anyway. If I really want to go with the ridiculous quality, I can always give them my website.


"That building in the background is distracting."
"Oh OK, I'll move it out of the way next time."
internet forum fail

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
UncleDoug
Goldmember
Avatar
1,103 posts
Joined Sep 2004
Location: North lake Tahoe, CA
     
Feb 02, 2006 14:51 as a reply to  @ Calzinger's post |  #17

The printed resolution thing is an interesting topic.
To me, unless you are wanting to put a loupe to the image or your intent requires it, full resolution on the printer end is over-kill.

Hope this helped.


-Uncle Doug
Canon 5D & 7D
Nikon D200 - :p
Mac and PC environment
VTour (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Balliolman
Goldmember
Avatar
4,150 posts
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Cornwall/Kernow
     
Feb 02, 2006 15:08 |  #18

For price, convenience and guaruntee the high street print shop has got it everytime! :-)


Balliolman
Stereoshooter
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/balliolman/ (external link)

Want to know more? Q. & A. with Balliolman: 3D/Stereo Photography https://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=150661

DReb; Canon 50 f1.8; Canon 28-135 IS; Loreo LIAC(T); Flashtrax; Canon 17-40 L; Manfrotto 055 PRO B tripod; Canon 28mm 2.8; Whibal
Need: Primes; Would like: Canon 5D;

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bodog
Goldmember
Avatar
1,306 posts
Joined Feb 2004
Location: Peculiar, MO
     
Feb 02, 2006 15:24 as a reply to  @ Balliolman's post |  #19

I'm curious UncleDoug, do you find that full resolution on soft finish papers like the rag you mentioned increases dot gain?


JimE
Color? It's all relative...

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
UncleDoug
Goldmember
Avatar
1,103 posts
Joined Sep 2004
Location: North lake Tahoe, CA
     
Feb 02, 2006 16:00 as a reply to  @ Bodog's post |  #20

Bodog wrote:
I'm curious UncleDoug, do you find that full resolution on soft finish papers like the rag you mentioned increases dot gain?

This is a fun one.

Technically dot gain is more of an inherent characteristic of the media itself. So print resolution should not be a factor of dot gain, unless you have a variable-droplet inkjet printer. But even then the variation wil be rather insignificant. It's more of the issue that at higher print resolutions you are laying down more ink per square area that you have to deal with.
Which, from some angles, could be interpreted as dot gain.


-Uncle Doug
Canon 5D & 7D
Nikon D200 - :p
Mac and PC environment
VTour (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bodog
Goldmember
Avatar
1,306 posts
Joined Feb 2004
Location: Peculiar, MO
     
Feb 02, 2006 17:02 as a reply to  @ UncleDoug's post |  #21

You're right, it would not necessarily be the increased resolution, but the increased amount of ink being laid down. In some instances I would think the paper could not handle it, leading to some blending. I can see no other reason that Epson would have profiles for their papers for both 1440 and 2880 dpi.


JimE
Color? It's all relative...

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
UncleDoug
Goldmember
Avatar
1,103 posts
Joined Sep 2004
Location: North lake Tahoe, CA
     
Feb 02, 2006 19:04 as a reply to  @ Bodog's post |  #22

Bodog wrote:
You're right, it would not necessarily be the increased resolution, but the increased amount of ink being laid down. In some instances I would think the paper could not handle it, leading to some blending. I can see no other reason that Epson would have profiles for their papers for both 1440 and 2880 dpi.

You got it!:D :D :D
There are 8 resolution settings on our Roland.
Some media have profiles for all settings while others only 3 or 4.
Photo/glossy media seem to be "compatible" at more resolutions than rag/canvas.


-Uncle Doug
Canon 5D & 7D
Nikon D200 - :p
Mac and PC environment
VTour (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
SWPhotoImaging
Goldmember
Avatar
3,231 posts
Joined Nov 2003
Location: No. Calif.
     
Feb 02, 2006 21:12 as a reply to  @ post 1149314 |  #23

SYS wrote:
If I have a Costco nearby, I'll definitely use their service for anything over 8x10. Up to 8x10 I use my own Canon printer.

I use my Canon printer up to 13x19 also, just not for pictures I intend to mat and frame or sell.


SWPhoto-Imaging

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

2,330 views & 0 likes for this thread, 13 members have posted to it.
get printed or print yourself?
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member was a spammer, and banned as such!
2070 guests, 100 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.