I was offered a Pentax k5ii for my 60D by a friend (body for body). Not sure if this is a worthy trade since I never shot Pentax before.
NJKEV Member 77 posts Joined Apr 2011 More info | Nov 30, 2013 13:14 | #1 I was offered a Pentax k5ii for my 60D by a friend (body for body). Not sure if this is a worthy trade since I never shot Pentax before.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 30, 2013 13:25 | #2 What are you going to use for lenses? Gerry
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 30, 2013 13:36 | #3 MakisM1 wrote in post #16490687 What are you going to use for lenses? I can get lenses for the Pentax, I'm more concerned if its a good trade. I saw on online that the Pentax has better image quality than the 60D. Now I don't want to base my choice on a online rating.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
stpix Member 222 posts Joined Mar 2013 More info | Nov 30, 2013 14:55 | #4 I used to be a Pentax film SLR guy. Had an ME Super from 1980 to 2001 when it died then got a ZX-M. Still have the ZX-M and 1980 model 28, 50 and 135 Pentax SMC lenses in the case on the shelf in my closet so I am not biased against Pentax. 7d T3i EF-S 10-22 EF-S 17-55 EF-S 18-55 EF-S 60 Macro EF-S 55-250 EF 400 mm 5.6 L EX 430
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mesakid Senior Member 364 posts Likes: 17 Joined Dec 2010 More info | Nov 30, 2013 15:03 | #5 The issue is, what do you shoot? (Sports, stills, etc.) Pentax does not make full-frame cameras, nor do they produce a line of long telephoto lenses. Furthermore, finding deals on lenses might not be as easy as Canon. https://www.youtube.com/that1cameraguy
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mwsilver Goldmember More info | Nov 30, 2013 15:25 | #6 NJKEV wrote in post #16490663 I was offered a Pentax k5ii for my 60D by a friend (body for body). Not sure if this is a worthy trade since I never shot Pentax before. What are you hoping to gain from the switch. If the Pentax is superior, why does you friend want to switch? If you don't have a plan and are not absolutely sure why you want to do it, don't do it! Mark
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 30, 2013 18:38 | #7 mwsilver wrote in post #16490898 What are you hoping to gain from the switch. If the Pentax is superior, why does you friend want to switch? If you don't have a plan and are not absolutely sure why you want to do it, don't do it! What I'm hoping to gain is better image quality. Is Pentax superior over the 60D is my question. For what I shoot, portraits, products and a concert form time to time the Pentax is tempting. As for my friend, he does video and likes the 60D.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 30, 2013 19:07 | #8 What's wrong with the 60D IQ for portraits, products and concerts? Gerry
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 30, 2013 19:08 | #9 From my limited knowledge of the Pentax, it uses a sensor made by Sony, probably the same one used by Nikon, and you will have a little better dynamic range. The Pentax does well in those DxOMark tests. Supposed to be a very good camera, so if lenses aren't an issue, it is probably a step up in image quality.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Unexpressive Member 105 posts Likes: 2 Joined Dec 2012 More info | Nov 30, 2013 19:51 | #10 NJKEV wrote in post #16491237 What I'm hoping to gain is better image quality. Is Pentax superior over the 60D is my question. For what I shoot, portraits, products and a concert form time to time the Pentax is tempting. As for my friend, he does video and likes the 60D. The practical differences in most aps-c modern dslr are almost meaningless in real life for practical shooting. I believe that if you are looking for better image quality, then you need a Full Frame (maybe the 6D). But most people believe there are not differences between FF and crop sensors. I have long and practical experience with both and personally I wouldn't go back to a crop sensor for my main system.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 30, 2013 20:18 | #11 Unexpressive wrote in post #16491386 The practical differences in most aps-c modern dslr are almost meaningless in real life for practical shooting. I believe that if you are looking for better image quality, then you need a Full Frame (maybe the 6D). But most people believe there are not differences between FF and crop sensors. I have long and practical experience with both and personally I wouldn't go back to a crop sensor for my main system. A body camera is nothing without the right lenses and flash systems. I left Pentax and bought full frames from Canon plus plenty of L/EF glass. Never been so happy in my life. Thank you. What I was looking for, someone with experience with both Canon and Pentax also crop and full frame. I am going to stick with my canon and maybe switch up to full frame down the road.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
mwsilver Goldmember More info | Nov 30, 2013 20:41 | #12 NJKEV wrote in post #16491452 Thank you. What I was looking for, someone with experience with both Canon and Pentax also crop and full frame. I am going to stick with my canon and maybe switch up to full frame down the road. If the Pentax is superior why would your friend want to trade it for a lesser camera? What's he getting out of the swap? Mark
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 30, 2013 21:43 | #13 Unexpressive wrote in post #16491386 The practical differences in most aps-c modern dslr are almost meaningless in real life for practical shooting. I believe that if you are looking for better image quality, then you need a Full Frame (maybe the 6D). But most people believe there are not differences between FF and crop sensors. I have long and practical experience with both and personally I wouldn't go back to a crop sensor for my main system. A body camera is nothing without the right lenses and flash systems. I left Pentax and bought full frames from Canon plus plenty of L/EF glass. Never been so happy in my life. I would posit that any half way decent portrait photographer can shoot better portraits with a crop than I can do with a full frame. Gerry
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Unexpressive Member 105 posts Likes: 2 Joined Dec 2012 More info | Nov 30, 2013 22:01 | #14 MakisM1 wrote in post #16491610 I would posit that any half way decent portrait photographer can shoot better portraits with a crop than I can do with a full frame. Seriously now, there are minute differences in perspective, DOF (unless by portraits you mean sharp eyelashes with all other facial features vanishing into a creamy haze...). For the controlled conditions of the studio, or the open air portraiture, ISO capability or DR is not an issue, unless you are really stuck up. I don't see IQ being an issue for the photography sectors the OP mentioned. If you can't stand the heat of the gearhead in the forum, get out of the kitchen... Let's see how much heat we can tolerate.....
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Nov 30, 2013 22:47 | #15 Unexpressive wrote in post #16491639 Let's see how much heat we can tolerate..... You are right, and good for you that you can get amazing results using crop sensors. Life is about choices and that's why we live in democracies ..... it gives each person the right to choose whatever suits his needs. For me, I just love sharp eyelashes and creamy hazes... That the main reason I do really enjoy using my full frame system.... it is my personal choice, my money and my photography..... I was addressing the OP and his(as far as I am concerned, IMHO...) reaction to peer pressure... (gearhead peer pressure). Gerry
LOG IN TO REPLY |
![]() | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is ANebinger 1115 guests, 173 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||