Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and our Privacy Policy.
OK
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Guest
Forums  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
Thread started 01 Dec 2013 (Sunday) 11:45
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

In camera correction: yay or nay

 
eddieb1
Senior Member
Avatar
986 posts
Likes: 227
Joined Apr 2013
Location: Oregon
     
Dec 01, 2013 11:45 |  #1

I have been reading numerous opinions as to the use of in camera correction, specifically, lens aberration correction. Some say having it enabled reduced IQ, some say no change. What is the current opinion here on the subject?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mike_d
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,689 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 1073
Joined Aug 2009
     
Dec 01, 2013 11:48 |  #2

If you shoot raw, it won't affect the file. I do my corrections in Lightroom. I'd rather start with the image exactly as captured, then decide how much correction to apply once I'm at my PC.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Left ­ Handed ­ Brisket
Combating camera shame since 1977...
Avatar
9,925 posts
Gallery: 15 photos
Likes: 2398
Joined Jun 2011
Location: The Uwharrie Mts, NC
     
Dec 01, 2013 11:52 as a reply to  @ mike_d's post |  #3

what he said ^

not every image exhibits those symptoms, so correcting for it would certainly give lower image quality.


PSA: The above post may contain sarcasm, reply at your own risk | Not in gear database: Auto Sears 50mm 2.0 / 3x CL-360, Nikon SB-28, SunPak auto 322 D, Minolta 20

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JeffreyG
"my bits and pieces are all hard"
Avatar
15,540 posts
Gallery: 42 photos
Likes: 619
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Detroit, MI
     
Dec 01, 2013 11:58 |  #4

Much better in post.

Here are some reasons you might wish to adjust in post:

1) Fixing distortion will reduce the field of view a little bit. If your image has no telltale straight lines to show distortion, you might not need the correction. Wouldn't you rather judge the look of the distortion vs. losing some of the images around the edge?

2) Fixing vignette applies an ISO boost to the edges. If you are talking about a lens like the 24/1.4L II, this boost can be as much as 4 stops. So an ISO 1600 shot will wind up with corners at ISO 25800 if you apply an auto correction. I have applied a blind auto-correct in post and watched the corners of some images turn purple with all kinds of banding and noise. Sometimes vignette is better than the fix.


My personal stuff:http://www.flickr.com/​photos/jngirbach/sets/ (external link)
I use a Canon 5DIII and a Sony A7rIII

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mike_d
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
5,689 posts
Gallery: 8 photos
Likes: 1073
Joined Aug 2009
     
Dec 01, 2013 12:04 |  #5

JeffreyG wrote in post #16492786 (external link)
1) Fixing distortion will reduce the field of view a little bit. If your image has no telltale straight lines to show distortion, you might not need the correction. Wouldn't you rather judge the look of the distortion vs. losing some of the images around the edge?

This happens to me a lot with wide angle lenses. Some times a little barrel distortion yields more realistic proportions than the stretching toward the corners that happens when you correct for it. Also, Lightroom lets you correct these things as much or as little as you want instead of a simple on/off switch.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
paddler4
Goldmember
Avatar
1,435 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 69
Joined Aug 2009
     
Dec 01, 2013 12:06 |  #6

Much better in post.

If you are shooting raw, you HAVE TO correct in post, because as Mike said, in-camera corrections won't affect the raw file (although some software may read the correction and apply it when rendering the image.)

I use mostly zooms, which are prone to barrel and pincushion distortion at the extremes and vignetting at the wide end, so correction is often worth it. however, it is trivial to check it out in LR, if you have a recognized lens. Just check the box and see what it looks like. If you get problems such as the ones Jeffrey noted, just uncheck the box. Very simple.


Check out my photos at http://dkoretz.smugmug​.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links (only for non-logged)

872 views & 0 likes for this thread, 5 members have posted to it.
In camera correction: yay or nay
FORUMS Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Forums   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset   •  Home

Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.58forum software
version 2.58 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is griggt
662 guests, 121 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.