Lack of a EVF makes this a non-starter for me. Feels like too much of a incremental upgrade to the original EOSM. Armed with the same sensor, this makes the deals to be had with the first EOSM look great.
midget Senior Member  511 posts Likes: 1 Joined Aug 2007 Location: NY More info | Dec 03, 2013 10:29 | #16 Lack of a EVF makes this a non-starter for me. Feels like too much of a incremental upgrade to the original EOSM. Armed with the same sensor, this makes the deals to be had with the first EOSM look great. 40d + 50mm f1.8 MK I + my feet.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
splbound Member 242 posts Likes: 1 Joined Feb 2007 Location: London, UK More info | I hope AF in low light conditions has been improved as well. It's my only real issue with the EOS M Classic. Any other improvement is just gravy.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
RallyMan Member 199 posts Joined Jul 2009 Location: SoCal More info | Dec 03, 2013 10:56 | #18 According to dpreview It appears that the EOS M2 won't be sold in either the European or US markets. canon | sigma | thinktank | sandisk | lexar | radiopopper | rrs | b+w | eneloop | creative light | westcott | upstrap
LOG IN TO REPLY |
bobbyz Cream of the Crop 20,506 posts Likes: 3479 Joined Nov 2007 Location: Bay Area, CA More info | Dec 03, 2013 10:59 | #19 splbound wrote in post #16498149  I hope AF in low light conditions has been improved as well. It's my only real issue with the EOS M Classic. Any other improvement is just gravy. Did you disable the AF assist? I did some tests at ISO12800, f2, 1/30 and camera takes approx same time to AF as my 6d with 35L. Fuji XT-1, 18-55mm
LOG IN TO REPLY |
bobbyz Cream of the Crop 20,506 posts Likes: 3479 Joined Nov 2007 Location: Bay Area, CA More info | Dec 03, 2013 11:00 | #20 Folks saying no VF need to shoot with M. I am VF guy and move to no VF was much smoother than I had expected. Fuji XT-1, 18-55mm
LOG IN TO REPLY |
gjl711 Wait.. you can't unkill your own kill.  57,730 posts Likes: 4065 Joined Aug 2006 Location: Deep in the heart of Texas More info | Dec 03, 2013 11:15 | #21 I have to say I am quite underwhelmed. Though I never bought into the M1, this upgrade is plain lame when compared to what others are doing in the marketplace. What is Canon thinking? Not sure why, but call me JJ.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DreDaze happy with myself for not saying anything stupid  More info | Dec 03, 2013 11:45 | #22 bobbyz wrote in post #16498194 Folks saying no VF need to shoot with M. I am VF guy and move to no VF was much smoother than I had expected. That may be true, but I think it was something they could have improved/added...I'm shocked there's no dual pixel...I haven't had time to look at both specs, but what has really been improved? Andre or Dre
LOG IN TO REPLY |
tgara Goldmember  2,336 posts Likes: 8 Joined Sep 2007 Location: Connecticut, USA More info | Dec 03, 2013 12:02 | #23 sega62 wrote in post #16497744 I don't get it, a flash should be a must! Even on the higher full frame. About the viewfinder, I love em, can't stand shooting looking at a screen. Then why not just get a G16 or a G1X? EOS 5D Mark III
LOG IN TO REPLY |
bobbyz Cream of the Crop 20,506 posts Likes: 3479 Joined Nov 2007 Location: Bay Area, CA More info | Dec 03, 2013 12:08 | #24 DreDaze wrote in post #16498324 That may be true, but I think it was something they could have improved/added...I'm shocked there's no dual pixel...I haven't had time to look at both specs, but what has really been improved? So no dual pixels like 70d? Sorry I missed that part. Fuji XT-1, 18-55mm
LOG IN TO REPLY |
vengence Goldmember 2,103 posts Likes: 108 Joined Mar 2013 More info | Dec 03, 2013 12:42 | #25 Lack of dual pixel AF is the killer on this. I'm surprised it doesn't have it.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dec 03, 2013 12:50 | #26  Permanent ban$650 dollars for this crap camera, wow!!
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dec 03, 2013 12:51 | #27 Permanent bangjl711 wrote in post #16498236 I have to say I am quite underwhelmed. Though I never bought into the M1, this upgrade is plain lame when compared to what others are doing in the marketplace. What is Canon thinking? they are scared where the market is heading. they are trying to protect their DSLR sales, even from themself...
LOG IN TO REPLY |
Dec 03, 2013 12:53 | #28 Permanent banbobbyz wrote in post #16498194 Folks saying no VF need to shoot with M. I am VF guy and move to no VF was much smoother than I had expected. i did, then I sold it
LOG IN TO REPLY |
DreDaze happy with myself for not saying anything stupid More info | Dec 03, 2013 12:53 | #29 nekrosoft13 wrote in post #16498497 $650 dollars for this crap camera, wow!! no wonder they won't release it in USA, EOS M sells here for $280 with a lens, no one would ever buy this. Yeah, but its discontinued- so soon it won't be available Andre or Dre
LOG IN TO REPLY |
arj Junior Member 26 posts Joined Feb 2012 Location: Slovakia More info | Dec 03, 2013 12:53 | #30 Not sure what Canon is thinking. But I am sure Sony and Fuji are laughing so hard that they wet their pants.
LOG IN TO REPLY |
 | x 1600 |
| y 1600 |
| Log in Not a member yet?
Register to forums
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!
|
| ||
| Latest registered member is ANebinger 1139 guests, 176 members online Simultaneous users record so far is 15,144, that happened on Nov 22, 2018 | |||
